A sample of 543 male inmates undergoing sex offender treatment completed the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). As predicted, the PICTS General Criminal Thinking (GCT), Proactive (P), and Reactive (R) scores correlated with sexual risk as measured by the total score on the Static-99. However, only the GCT and P scores correlated with sentence length, and none of the PICTS scores successfully discriminated between a current offense of child molestation and a current offense of adult rape/sexual assault. A confirmatory factor analysis verified previous factor analyses of the PICTS conducted on nonsex offenders whereby the PICTS thinking style scales displayed significantly better fit with a two-factor (proactive, reactive) than with a one-factor (general criminal thinking) model. These results lend preliminary support to the notion that criminal thinking in general and proactive/instrumental criminal thinking in particular have something to offer sex offender assessment.
Abel, G.G., Becker, J.V., & Cunningham-Rathner, J. (1984). Complications, consent and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89-103.
2.
Akaike, H. ( 1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika , 52, 317-332.
3.
Bard, L.A., Carter, D.L., Cerce, D.D., Knight, R.A., Rosenberg, R., & Schneider, B. ( 1987). A descriptive study of rapists and child molesters: Developmental, clinical, and criminal characteristics. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 203-220.
4.
Beckett, R. C. (1987). The children and sex questionnaire. (Available from Richard Beckett, Room FF39, The Oxford Clinic, Littlemore Health Centre, Sandford Road, Littlemore, Oxford, OX44XN, England)
5.
Bentler, P.M. ( 1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. ( 1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bumby, K.M. ( 1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37-54.
8.
Cooper, S. ( 2005). Understanding, treating, and managing sex offenders who deny their offence. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 85-94.
9.
Fabian, J.M. ( 2006). A literature review of the utility of selected violence and sexual violence risk assessment instruments. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 34, 307-350.
10.
Felson, R.B. ( 2003). Motives for sexual coercion. In M. Silberman (Ed.), Violence and society: A reader (pp. 194-206). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/ Pearson Education.
11.
Grubin, D. ( 1998). Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk (Police Research Series Paper 99). London: Home Office.
12.
Hanson, R.K. ( 1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario : Department of the Solicitor General of Canada . Retrieved from http://www.sgc.gc.ca/epub/corr/e199704/e199704.htm
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2007). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessment for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis (Cat. No. PS4-36/2007E) . Ottawa, Ontario: Public Works and Government Services. Retrieved from http://www.nicic.org/library/022196
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 119-136.
16.
Hatch-Maillette, M.A., Scalora, M.J., Huss, M.T., & Baumgartner, J.V. (2001). Criminal thinking patterns: Are child molesters unique? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 102-117.
17.
Horley, J., & Quinsey, V.L. ( 1994). Assessing the cognitions of child molesters: Use of the semantic differential with incarcerated offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 171-178.
18.
Klein, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York : Guilford.
19.
Knight, R.A. ( 1999, September). Unified theory of sexual coercion. Paper presented at the 18th annual Research and Treatment Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Lake Buena Vista, FL.
20.
Knight, R.A., & Thornton, D. ( 2007). Evaluating and improving risk assessment schemes for sexual recidivism: A long-term follow-up of convicted sexual offenders (Final Report, NCJ 217618). Available from http://nij.ncjrs.gov/publications
21.
Lanyon, R.I. ( 2001). Psychological assessment procedures in sex offending . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 253-260.
22.
Lussier, P. ( 2005). The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: Revisiting the specialization debate. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 269-292.
23.
Nichols, H.R., & Molinder, I. ( 1996). Multiphasic Sex Inventory II. Tacoma, WA: Nichols and Molinder Assessments.
24.
Roberts, C.F., Doren, D.M., & Thornton, D. ( 2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.
25.
Steiger, J.H. ( 1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix . Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
26.
Van Ness, S.R. ( 1984). Rape as instrumental violence: A study of youth offenders. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation , 9, 161-170.
27.
Walters, G.D. ( 1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307-325.
28.
Walters, G.D. ( 2002). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS): A review and meta-analysis. Assessment, 9, 278-291.
29.
Walters, G.D. ( 2005). Incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles as a predictor of continuous and dichotomous measures of recidivism. Assessment, 12, 19-27.
30.
Walters, G.D. ( 2006). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) professional manual. Allentown, PA: Center for Lifestyle Studies.
31.
Walters, G.D. ( 2008). Self-report measures of psychopathy, antisocial personality, and criminal lifestyle: Testing and validating a two-dimensional model. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1459-1483.
32.
Walters, G.D. (in press). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles and Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version as incrementally valid predictors of recidivism. Law and Human Behavior.
33.
Walters, G.D., & Elliott, W.N. ( 1999). Predicting release and disciplinary outcome with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Female data. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 15-21.
34.
Walters, G.D., Felix, C., & Reinoehl, R. ( 2009). Cross-gender invariance and replicability of a two-dimensional model of antisociality in male and female college students . Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 704-708.
35.
Ward, T., Hudson, S.M., Johnston, L., & Marshall, W.L. (1997). Cognitive distortion in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479-507.
