This study investigates whether sex offenders' age at release from custody affects their likelihood of reoffending. The participants were 468 men with a mean follow-up (time at risk) of just more than 5 years after release. Items from the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide, the Rapid Risk Assessment of Sexual Offense Recidivism, the Static-99, and the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Test—Revised were coded. Results show that the predictive ability of items tapping antisocial behavior is inflated by their association with age at release, whereas the predictive ability of items tapping sexual deviance is diminished by that association. An assessment instrument comprising an age-corrected antisocial behavior scale, an age-corrected sexual deviance scale, and an age at release scale predicted recidivism as well as the best existing actuarial instruments. Cox regression analysis shows that age at release provided unique and significant predictive ability over and above age-corrected antisocial behavior and age-corrected sexual deviance combined.
Barbaree, H.E., & Blanchard, R. (2008). Sexual deviance over the lifespan: Reductions in deviant sexual behavior in the aging sex offender. In D. R. Laws & W. O'Donohue (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 37-60). New York: Guilford.
2.
Barbaree, H.E., Blanchard, R., & Langton, C.M. (2003). The development of sexual aggression through the life span: The effect of age on sexual arousal and recidivism among sex offenders . In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 59-71). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
3.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., & Blanchard, R. (2007). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the VRAG and SORAG: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 6, 29-46.
4.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., Blanchard, R., & Boer, D. (2008). Predicting recidivism in sex offenders using the SVR-20: The contribution of age-at-release. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(1), 47-64.
5.
Barbaree, H.E., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. (2006). The factor structure of actuarial items: Its relation to prediction. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment , 18, 207-226.
6.
Boer, D.P., Hart, S.D., Kropp, P.R., & Webster, C.D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
7.
Borum, R., Otto, R., & Golding, S. (1993). Improving clinical judgment and decision making in forensic evaluation. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 21, 35-76.
8.
Craig, L.A. (2008). How should we understand the effect of age on sexual recidivism. Sexual Aggression, 14, 185-198.
9.
Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
10.
Dickey, R., Nussbaum, D., Chevolleau, K., & Davidson, H. (2002). Age as a differential characteristic of rapists, pedophiles, and sexual sadists. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 211-218.
11.
Doren, D.M. (2004). Toward a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 835-856.
12.
Doren, D.M. (2006). What do we know about the effect of aging on recidivism risk for sexual offenders? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 137-157.
13.
Epperson, D.L., Kaul, J.D., Huot, S.J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (1998). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R). St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
14.
Fazel, S., Sjöstedt, G., Långström, N., & Grann, M. (2006). Risk factors for criminal recidivism in older sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 159-167.
15.
Freund, K. (1976). Diagnosis and treatment of forensically significant anomalous erotic preferences. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 18, 181-189.
16.
Hanley, J.A., & McNeil, B.J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.
17.
Hanley, J.A., & McNeil, B.J. (1983). A method of comparing the area under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148, 839-843.
18.
Hanson, R.K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism (User Report 1997-04). Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada .
19.
Hanson, R.K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data on 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046-1062.
20.
Hanson, R.K. (2006). Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 343-355.
21.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
22.
Hanson, R.K., Morton, K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2003). Sex offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 154-166). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
23.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Gatineau, Quebec : Public Works and Government Services Canada.
24.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
25.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 1999-02). Ottawa, Ontario : Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
26.
Hare, R.D. (1991). Manual for the revised Psychopathy Checklist. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. (2003). Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders . In R. A. Prentky, E. S. Janus, & M. C. Seto (Eds.), Sexually coercive behavior: Understanding and management (Vol. 989, pp. 198-210). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
29.
Harris, G.T., & Rice, M.E. (2007). Adjusting actuarial violence risk assessments based on aging or the passage of time. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 297-313.
30.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Quinsey, V.L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
31.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552-584.
32.
Langevin, R. (1983). Sexual strands: Understanding and treating sexual anomalies in men. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Langton, C.M., Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Peacock, E.J., Harkins, L., & Hansen, K.T. (2007). Actuarial assessment of risk for re-offence among adult sex offenders: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the Static-2002 and five other instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 34, 37-59.
34.
Laws, D. R., & O'Donohue, W. (Eds.). (1997). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford.
35.
Laws, D. R., & O'Donohue, W. (Eds.). (2008). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment and treatment (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
36.
Lussier, P., & Healey, J. (in press). Rediscovering Quetelet, again: The "aging" offender and the prediction of reoffending in a sample of adult sex offenders. Justice Quarterly.
37.
Lynam, D.R., Hoyle, R.H., & Newman, J.P. (2006). The perils of partialling: Cautionary tales from aggression and psychopathy. Assessment, 13, 328-341.
38.
Marchese, M.C. (1992). Clinical versus actuarial prediction: A review of the literature. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 583-594.
39.
McGraw, K.O., & Wong, S.P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46. (Correction, 1, 390).
40.
Meehl, P. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
41.
Metz, C.E. (2006). ROCKIT 1.1B2 Beta version for Windows Operating System. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL_ROC/software_index6.htm
42.
Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
43.
Prentky, R.A., Janus, E., Barbaree, H.E., Schwartz, B.K., & Kafka, M.P. (2006). Sexually violent predators in the court-room: Science on trial. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 12, 357-393.
44.
Prentky, R.A., & Lee, A.F.S. (2007). Effect of age-at-release on long term sexual re-offense rates in civilly committed sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 43-59.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
48.
Roberts, C.F., Doren, D.M., & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569-589.
49.
Rowland, J.M., Greenleaf, L.J., Dorfman, W.J., & Davidson, D.L. (1993). Aging and sexual function in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 545-557.
50.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (2003). Life course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555-592.
51.
Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical . Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178-200.
52.
Skelton, A., & Vess, J. (2008). Risk of sexual recidivism as a function of age and actuarial risk. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 199-209.
53.
Swets, J.A. (1986). Forms of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: Implications for theory and measurement performance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 181-198.
54.
Swets, J.A., Dawes, R.M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions . Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 1, 1-26.
55.
Thornton, D. (2006). Age and sexual recidivism: A variable connection . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 123-135.
56.
Thornton, D., & Hanson, R.K. (2003, October). Models of real re-offence rates: Clinical implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, St. Louis, MO.
57.
Wollert, R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes's theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56-85.
