This article examines the heightened risk of prisoner abuse that is created in supermax prison settings. It suggests that a combination of powerful contextual forces to which correctional officers are exposed can influence and affect them in ways that may engender a culture of mistreatment or harm. Those forces include a problematic set of ideological beliefs, a surrounding environment or ecology that is structured in such a way as to encourage cruelty, and a particularly intense—even desperate—set of interpersonal dynamics created between prisoners and guards. The importance of taking this heightened potential for abuse into account when discussing the negative effects of supermax and proposals for its reform is discussed.
Arax, M. (1996, August 21). Brutality behind bars. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
2.
Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American society. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Bragg, R. (1995, March 26). Chain gangs to return to roads of Alabama . New York Times, p. 9.
5.
Briggs, C., Sundt, J., & Castellano, T. (2003). The effect of supermaximum security prisons on aggregate levels of institutional violence. Criminology, 41, 1341-1376.
6.
Bruton, J. (2004). The big house: Life inside a supermax security prison. Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press.
7.
Butterfield, F. (1997, May 12). States toughen up juvenile-crime laws . San Jose Mercury News, p. 1A.
8.
Christie, N. (1982). Limits to pain. Oxford, UK: Robertson.
9.
Christie, N. (1993). Crime control as industry: Towards gulags, Western style?London: Routledge.
10.
Cloyes, K., Lovell, D., Allen, D., & Rhodes, L. (2006). Assessment of psychosocial impairement in a supermaximum security unit sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 760-781.
11.
Cohen, F. (2006). Isolation in penal settings: The isolation-restraint paradigm. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy , 22, 295-324.
12.
Correctional Association of New York. (2004 ). Mental health in the house of corrections: A study of mental health care in New York State prisons. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://www.correctionalassociation.org/PVP/publications/Mental-Health.pdf
13.
Cullen, F. (1995). Assessing the penal harm movement. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 338, 340. DiIulio, J. (1995, November 27). The coming of the super-predators . Weekly Standard, p. 23.
14.
Duxbury, J. (2002). An evaluation of staff and patient views of and strategies employed to manage inpatient aggression and violence on one mental health unit: A pluralistic design. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 9, 325-337.
15.
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449-474.
16.
Fernandez, E. (1997, December 14). Video of guards killing inmates at state prison. San Francisco Examiner, p. D-1.
17.
Forer, L. (1994). A rage to punish: The unintended consequences of mandatory sentencing. New York: Norton.
18.
Gibbons, J., & Katzenbach, N. (2006). Confronting confinement: A report of the Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
19.
Haney, C. (1993). Infamous punishment: The psychological effects of isolation. National Prison Project Journal, 8, 3-21.
20.
Haney, C. (1998). Riding the punishment wave: On the origins of our devolving standards of decency. Hastings Women's Law Journal , 9, 27-78.
21.
Haney, C. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and "supermax" confinement. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 124-156.
22.
Haney, C. (2006). Reforming punishment: Psychological limits to the pains of imprisonment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
Haney, C., Banks, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.
24.
Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Regulating prisons of the future: A psychological analysis of supermax and solitary confinement. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 23, 477-570.
25.
Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1977). The socialization into criminality: On becoming a prisoner and a guard. In J. Tapp & F. Levine (Eds.), Law, justice, and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues (pp. 198-223). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Hodgins, S., & Cote, G. (1991). The mental health of penitentiary inmates in isolation . Canadian Journal of Criminology, 33, 177-182.
28.
Holding, R. (1996a, October 28). Accusations of prison coverup, agency hid staged fights at Corcoran, guards say. San Francisco Chronicle , p. A1.
29.
Holding, R. (1996b, December 18). Exercise yards to reopen at Corcoran prison. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A17.
30.
Human Rights Watch. (2000). Out of sight: Super maximum security confinement in the United States. New York: Author. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from, http://www.hrw.org/reports/2000/supermax/index.htm#TopOfPage
31.
Ilkiw-Lavalle, O., & Grenyer, B. (2003). Differences between patient and staff perceptions of aggression in mental health units. Psychiatric Services , 54, 389-393.
32.
International Psychological Trauma Symposium. ( 2007, December 9). Istanbul statement on the use and effects of solitary confinement, Istanbul, Turkey.
33.
Jones 'El v. Berge, 164 F. Supp. 1096 (W.D. Wis. 2001).
34.
Klein, O., & Snyder, M. (2003). Stereotypes and behavioral confirmation: From interpersonal to intergroup perspectives. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 153-234). New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
35.
Lee, J. (1996, July 14). Inmates claim brutality at top-security prison. San Jose Mercury News, p. 3B.
36.
Lovell, D. (2008) Patterns of Disturbed Behavior in a Supermax Population . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 985-1004.
37.
Lovell, D., Cloyes, K., Allen, D., & Rhodes, L. (2000). Who lives in super-maximum custody? A Washington State study. Federal Probation, 64, 33-38.
38.
Lovell, D., Johnson, L., & Cain, K. (2007). Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington State. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 633-656.
39.
Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1995).
40.
Morris, N. (2000). Prisons in the USA: Supermax-The bad and the mad . In L. Fairweather & S. McConville (Eds.), Prison architecture: Policy, design, and experience (pp. 98-108). London: Architectural Press.
41.
Mydans, S. (1995, March 7). Hard time: What we have here is a failure to tolerate. San Jose Mercury News, p. A9.
42.
Navarro, M. (1995, November 21). Florida prisons to revive using chain gangs-But with limits. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A7.
43.
Opotow, S. (1990). Moral exclusion and injustice: An introduction . Journal of Social Issues, 46, 1-20.
44.
Pasternak, J. (1997, August 7). Prisons are becoming landlords, inmates in some states are being charged monthly rent, though few can pay. San Jose Mercury News, p. A8.
45.
Rhodes, L. (2002). Psychopathy and the face of control in supermax . Ethnography, 3, 442-466.
46.
Riveland, C. (1999). Supermax prisons: Overview and general considerations . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
47.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48.
Ruiz v. Johnson, 37 F. Supp. 2d 855 (S.D. Tex. 1999), rev'd, 178 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1999).
49.
Smith, P. (2006). The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (Vol. 34, pp. 441-528). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Snyder, M., & Klein, O. (2005). Construing and constructing others: On the reality and the generality of the behavioral confirmation scenario. Interaction Studies, 6, 53-67.
51.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656-666.
52.
Tachiki, S. (1995). Indeterminate sentences in supermax prisons based upon alleged gang affiliations: A reexamination of procedural protection and a proposal for greater procedural requirements. California Law Review, 83, 1117-1149.
53.
Toch, H. (2001). The future of supermax confinement. The Prison Journal, 81, 376-388.
54.
Valdes v. Crosby, 450 F. 3d 1231 (11 Cir. 2006).
55.
Walt, K. (1999, March 29). High-control unit may be next battleground for inmate rights. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://www.chron.com./content/story.html/page1/222960
56.
"We stand with you" [Advertisement]. (1997, January 1). Fresno Bee.
57.
Whittington, R., & Richter, D. (2005). Interactional aspects of violent behaviour on acute psychiatric wards. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 377-388.
58.
Wilson, J. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York : Basic Books.
59.
Word, R. (2007, January 18). Deal reached in Florida prison death case. South Florida Sun-Sentinel. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from, http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-prisoner-abuse,0,5284843.story
60.
Zimring, F., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you're out in California. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
