Violence is a serious social problem that is often encountered in the youth justice system. Identifying those adolescents who are at the highest risk for future violence is an important step toward effective rehabilitation. The current study examined the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), a structured professional judgment risk tool, in a sample of 121 juvenile offenders. The SAVRY was found to have strong predictive validity, a finding that was robust across gender and ethnicity. The SAVRY obtained ROC values of .75 and .66 for general and violent recidivism, respectively, for 1 year, and values of .76 and .77 for general and violent recidivism, respectively, for 3-year follow-up. For nonviolent recidivism, the ROC values were .80 for 1-year and .68 during 3 years. Use of the SAVRY in the youth justice system, and limitations of the study, are discussed.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of Service Inventory—Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
2.
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
3.
Bartel, P., Forth, A., & Borum, R. (2003). Development and concurrent validation of the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Manuscript under review.
4.
Borum, R. (2000). Assessing violence risk among youth. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(10), 1263-1288.
5.
Borum, R. (2003). Managing at-risk juvenile offenders in the community: Putting evidence-based principles into practice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 19, 114-137.
6.
Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Consultation version. Tampa: Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
7.
Borum, R., & Verhaagen, D. (2006). Assessing and managing violence risk in juveniles . New York: Guilford.
8.
Campbell, M.A., Porter, S., & Santor, D. (2004). Psychopathic traits in adolescent offenders: An evaluation of criminal history, clinical, and psychosocial correlates. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22(1), 23-47.
9.
Catchpole, E.H., & Gretton, H.M. (2003). The predictive validity of risk assessment with violent young offenders: A one-year examination of criminal outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(6), 688-708.
10.
Cohen, M.A. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high risk youth . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 5-33.
11.
Cook, P.J., & Laub, J.H. (2002). After the epidemic: Recent trends in youth violence in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 29, pp. 1-37). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Costigan, S., & Rawana, E. (1999, June). Critical evaluation of the long-term validity of the risk/need assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal, Quebec.
13.
Cottle, C., Lee, R.L., & Heilbrun, K. (2001). The prediction of criminal recidivism in juveniles: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 367-394.
14.
Douglas K.S., & Webster, C.D. (1999). Predicting violence in mentally and personality disordered individuals. In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Law and psychology: The state of the discipline (pp. 176-239). New York: Plenum .
15.
Forth, A.E., & Burke, H.C. (1998). Psychopathy in adolescence: Assessment, violence, and developmental precursors. In D. J. Cooke, A. E. Forth, & R. D. Hare (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research, and implications for society (pp. 205-229). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Gray, N.S., Hill, C., McGleish, A., Timmons, D., MacCulloch, M.J., & Snowden, R.J. (2003). Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: A prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20 and PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 443-451.
18.
Gretton, H.M., Hare, R.D., & Catchpole, R.E.H. (2004). Psychopathy and offending from adolescence to adulthood: A 10-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(4), 636-645.
19.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
20.
Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
21.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., & Cormier, C.A. (1991). Psychopathy and violent recidivism. Law and Human Behaviour, 15, 625-637.
22.
Hemphill, J.F., Hare, R.D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139-170.
23.
Hoge, R.D. (1999). An expanded role for psychological assessments in juvenile justice systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 26, 251-266.
24.
Hoge, R.D., & Andrews, D.A. (1996). Assessing the youthful offender: Issues and techniques . New York: Plenum.
25.
Jack, L.A., & Ogloff, J.R.P. (1997). Factors affecting the referral of young offenders for medical and psychological assessment under the Young Offender Act. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 39, 247-273.
26.
Jung, S., & Rawana, E. (1999). Risk and need assessment of juvenile offenders . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 69-89.
27.
Koop, C.E., & Lundberg, G.D. (1992). Violence in America: A public health emergency. Journal of the American Medical Association , 267, 3075-3076.
28.
Kropp, P., Hart, S., Webster, C., & Eaves, D. (1999). Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide user's manual . Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems and B.C. Institute Against Family Violence.
29.
McEachran, A. (2001). The predictive validity of the PCL:YV and the SAVRY in a population of young offenders. Unpublished master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia , Canada.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 737-748.
32.
Salekin, R.T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K.W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist—Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.
33.
Schmidt, F., Hoge, R.D., & Gomes, L. (2005). Reliability and Validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 32(3), 329-344.
34.
Snyder, H.N., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report (NCJ 178257). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
35.
Statistics Canada. (1999). Change in rates of youth violent crime from 1977-1998. Retrieved August 20, 2003, from http://www.statcan.ca/english/indepth/85-002/feature/jurl1999012021sda.htm
36.
Statistics Canada. (2001). Rates of youth and adult criminal behaviour by type. Retrieved August 20, 2003, from http://www.statcan.ca/english/Pgdb/State/Justice/legal14.htm
37.
Thompson, A.P., & Putnins, A.L. (2003). Risk-need assessment inventories for juvenile offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 10(2), 324-333.
38.
Webster, C.D., Douglas, K.S., Eaves, S.D., & Hart, S.D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2) . Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
