Community registration laws requiring sex offenders to register with local law enforcement have become increasingly popular and increasingly restrictive in recent years. Although these laws were passed under the auspices of protecting communities from dangerous and violent sexual predators, little research has addressed their efficacy or their consequences. Building on a social capital framework that emphasizes the resources provided by local ties to family, friends, and the community, data from semistructured interviews with 23 sex offenders were analyzed to explore their experiences with local social capital while being registered and on and off of parole. Sex offenders discuss problems accessing and participating in networks of local social capital, incidents of community residential mobilization against them, and their experiences with formal barriers to social capital, including parole restrictions.
Alba, R.D., Denton, N.A., Leung, S.J., & Logan, J.R. (1995). Neighborhood change under conditions of mass immigration: The New York City region, 1970-1990. International Migration Review, 29, 625-656.
2.
Bursik, R.J., & Grasmick, H.G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York : Lexington Books.
3.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
4.
Clear, T.R., Rose, D.R., & Ryder, J.A. (2001). Incarceration and the community: The problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime & Delinquency , 47, 335-351.
5.
Edwards, W., & Hensley, C. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 83-101.
6.
Elbogen, E.B., Patry, M., & Scalora, M. (2003). The impact of community notification laws on sex offender treatment attitudes. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 207-219.
7.
Freeman-Longo, R.E. (1996). Prevention or problem?Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 8, 91-100.
8.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity . New York: Touchstone Books.
9.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
10.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services.
11.
Hepburn, J.R., & Griffin, M.L. (2004). The effect of social bonds on successful adjustment to probation: An event history analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 29, 46-75.
12.
Hudson, K. (2005). Offending identities: Sex offenders' perspectives on their treatment and management. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
13.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61-88.
14.
Kubrin, C.E., & Weitzer, R. (2003). New directions in social disorganization theory . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 374-402.
15.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005a). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
16.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005b). The effect of Megan's Law on sex offender reintegration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 49-66.
17.
Marshall, W.L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sexual offenders . New York: John Wiley.
18.
Meloy, M.L. (2005). The sex offender next door: An analysis of recidivism, risk factors and deterrence of sex offenders on probation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 211-236.
19.
Meloy, M.L. (2006). Sex offenses and the men who commit them: An assessment of sex offenders on probation. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
20.
Morenoff, J.D., Sampson, R.J., & Raudenbush, S.W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517-559.
21.
Mustaine, E.E., & Tewksbury, R. (in press). Registered sex offenders, residence, and the influence of race. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice.
22.
Mustaine, E.E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K.M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27, 329-350.
23.
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937-975.
24.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
25.
Putnam, R. (2001). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26.
Rose, D.R., & Clear, T.R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: Implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36, 441-480.
27.
Rose, D.R., & Clear, T.R. (2003). Incarceration, reentry and social capital: Social networks in the balance. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed (pp. 314-342). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
28.
Rose, D.R., Clear, T.R., & Ryder, J.A. (2000). Drugs, incarceration, and neighborhood life: The impact of reintegrating offenders into the community. Final Report to theNational Institute of Justice. New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
29.
Rosenbaum, E., & Friedman, S. (2001). Mobility incidence and turnover as components of neighborhood racial and ethnic change in New York City, 1991 to 1996. Journal of Housing Research, 12, 27-53.
30.
Rosenfeld, R., Messner, S.F., & Baumer, E.P. (2001). Social capital and homicide. Social Forces, 80, 283-310.
31.
Sampson, R.J., & Groves, W.B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774-802.
32.
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
33.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 67-81.
35.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum , 26, 309-334.
36.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (in press). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime and Delinquency.
37.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E.E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 61-75.
38.
Tewksbury, R., Mustaine, E.E., & Stengel, K.M. (in press). Residential concentrations of rural registered sex offenders . American Journal of Criminal Justice.
39.
Travis, J., & Waul, M. (2003). Prisoners once removed: The children and families of prisoners. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed (pp. 1-29). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
40.
Vandiver, D.M., & Walker, J.T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27, 284-300.
41.
Visher, C., La Vigne, N.G., & Travis, J. (2004). Returning home: Understanding the challenges of prisoner reentry (Maryland Pilot Study: Findings from Baltimore). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
42.
Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Wilson, W.J., & Taub, R.P. (2006). There goes the neighborhood: Racial, ethnic, and class tensions in four Chicago neighborhoods and their meaning for America . New York: Knopf.
44.
Zevitz, R.G., & Farkas, M.A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375-391.
