The benchmark model for count data is the Poisson distribution, and the standard statistical procedure for analyzing count data is Poisson regression. However, highly restrictive assumptions lead to frequent misspecification of the Poisson model. Alternate approaches, such as negative binomial regression, zero modified procedures, and truncated and censored models are consequently required to handle count data in many social science contexts. Empirical examples from correctional and forensic psychology are provided to illustrate the importance of replacing ordinary least squares regression with Poisson class procedures in situations when count data are analyzed.
Cameron, A.C., & Trivedi, P.K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29-53.
2.
Cameron, A.C., & Trivedi, P.K. (1990). Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal ofEconometrics, 46, 347-364.
3.
Cameron, A.C., & Trivedi, P.K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Chakravart, I.M., Laha, R.G., & Roy, J. (1967). Handbook of methods of applied statistics (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley.
5.
Davutyan, N. (1989). Bank failures as Poisson variates. Economic Letters, 29, 333-338.
6.
DeLisi, M. (2003). Criminal careers behind bars. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 653-669.
7.
Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (3rd ed.). New York : John Wiley.
8.
Gardner, W., Mulvey, E.P., & Shaw, E.C. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin,118, 392-404.
9.
Glynn, R.J., & Buring, J.E. (1996). Ways of measuring rates of recurrent events. British Medical Journal, 312, 364-367.
10.
Greene, W.H. (1994). Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in Poisson and negative binomial regression models (Working Paper No. 94-10) . New York: Stern School of Business, New York University.
Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-298.
15.
Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1-14.
16.
Lindsey, J.K. (1995). Modelling frequency and count data. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Long, J.S. (1990). The origins of sex differences in science. Social Forces, 68, 1297-1315.
18.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Morey, L.C. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
20.
Osgood, D.W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 16, 21-43.
21.
SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS/STAT user's guide (Version 8). Cary, NC: Author.
22.
Schumacker, R. E., & Marcoulides, G. A. (Eds.). (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
StataCorp. (2005). STATA Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX: Author.
24.
Sturman, M.C. (1999). Multiple approaches to analyzing count data in studies of individual differences: The propensity for Type I errors, illustrated with the case of absenteeism prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 414-430.
25.
Von Bortkiewicz, L. (1898). Das Gesetz de Kleinen Zahlen [The law of small numbers]. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner .
26.
Vuong, Q.H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307-333.
27.
Walters, G.D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307-325.
28.
Walters, G.D. (2005). Predicting institutional adjustment with the Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form and Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4, 63-70.
29.
Walters, G.D. (2006). Measuring the utility of journals in the crime-psychology field: Beyond the impact factor. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 57, 1804-1813
30.
Walters, G.D., & Duncan, S.A. (2005). Use of the PCL-R and PAI to predict release outcome in inmates undergoing forensic evaluation. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry andPsychology, 16, 459-476.
31.
Walters, G.D., White, T.W., & Denney, D. (1991). The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form: Preliminary data. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 18, 406-418.
32.
Winkelmann, R. (2003). Econometric analysis of count data (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
