This study examined the associations between young offenders' justifications for delinquent behavior, their perceptions of being labeled “delinquent,” and criminal history. Young offenders (N = 153) serving community orders completed a questionnaire that assessed their use of justifications for offending (neutralizations) and their perceptions of being delinquent. More than half did not believe that others labeled them as delinquent. Those who did believe so self-reported more delinquency and other problem behaviors but did not a have more serious official criminal history than “unlabeled” offenders. Factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure (minimization and rationalization) for the neutralization items. Neutralization factors were weak predictors of official criminal history but were stronger predictors of self-reported delinquency and other problem behaviors. Findings are discussed with reference to the implications for risk and responsivity principles in the treatment of young offenders.
Al-Talib, N.I., & Griffin, C. (1994). Labeling effect on adolescents' self-concept. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38, 47-56.
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
4.
Ashkar, P., & Kenny, D.T. (2007). Moral reasoning of adolescent male offenders: Comparison of sexual and nonsexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 108-118.
5.
Austin, R.L. (1977). Commitment, neutralization, and delinquency. In T. N. Ferdinand (Ed.), Juvenile delinquency: Little brother grows up (pp. 121-137). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Barriga, A.Q., & Gibbs, J.C. (1996). Measuring cognitive distortion in antisocial youth: Development and preliminary validation of the “How I Think” questionnaire . Aggressive Behavior, 22, 333-343.
7.
Barriga, A.Q., Landau, J.R., Stinson, B.L., II, Liau, A.K., & Gibbs, J.C. (2000). Cognitive distortion and problem behaviors in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 36-56.
8.
Bartusch, D.J., & Matsueda, R.L. (1996). Gender, reflected-appraisals, and labeling: A cross-group test of interactionist theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 75, 145-177.
9.
Becker, H.S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance . New York: Free Press.
10.
Blackburn, R. (1993). The psychology of criminal conduct. New York: Wiley.
11.
Browne, M.W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111-150.
12.
Burke, R.H. (2001). An introduction to criminological theory. Devon, UK: Willam Publishing.
13.
Burke, P.J., & Tully, J.C. (1977). The measurement of role identity. Social Forces, 55, 881-897.
14.
Burns, B.R. (1979). The self-concept in theory, measurement, development and behavior. London: Longman.
15.
Byrd, K.R., O'Connor, K., Thackrey, M., & Sacks, J.M. (1993). The utility of self-concept as a predictor of recidivism among juvenile offenders. Journal of Psychology , 127, 195-202.
16.
Chassin, L., Eason, B.J., & Young, R.D. (1981). Identifying with a deviant label: The validation of a methodology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 31-36.
17.
Chassin, L., Presson, C.C., Young, R.D., & Light, R. (1981). Self-concepts of institutionalized adolescents: A framework for conceptualizing labeling effects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 143-151.
18.
Chassin, L., & Stager, S.F. (1984). Determinants of self-esteem among incarcerated delinquents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 382-390.
19.
Chassin, L., & Young, R.D. (1981). Salient self-conceptions in normal and deviant adolescents. Adolescence, 16, 613-620.
20.
Cooley, C.H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
21.
Department of Juvenile Justice. (2005, October). Internal report. Retrieved October 7, 2005 , from the Department of Juvenile Justice Client Information Management System.
22.
Emler, N., & Reicher, S. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency: The collective management of reputation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23.
Erickson, P.G. (n.d.). The social effects of punishment on drug users. Retrieved January 16, 2005, from http://www.drugtext.org/library/books/erickson
24.
Ericson, R.V. (1975). Criminal reactions: The labeling perspective. Westmead, UK: Saxon House Lexington Books.
25.
Evans, R.C., Levy, L., Sullenberger, T., & Vyas, A. (1991). Self-concept and delinquency: The on-going debate . Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16, 59-74.
26.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. London: Tavistock.
Geiger, B., & Fischer, M. (2005). Naming oneself criminal: Gender difference in offenders' identity negotiation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 194-209.
29.
Gibbs, J.C. (1993). Moral-cognitive interventions. In A. P. Goldstein & H. C. Ronald (Eds.), The gang intervention handbook (pp. 159-185). Champaign, IL: Research Press.
30.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Heimer, K., & Matsueda, R.L. (1994). Role-taking, role commitment, and delinquency: A theory of differential social control. American Sociological Review, 59, 365-390.
32.
Hine, J., & France, A. (2005, September). Pathways in and out of crime: Young people's perspectives. Paper presented at a joint seminar of the School of Humanities and Social Justice and Social Change Research Centre, University of Western Sydney, Australia.
33.
Jensen, G.F. (1980). Labeling and identity: Toward a reconciliation of divergent findings. Criminology, 18, 121-129.
34.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime: Moral and sensual attractions in doing evil. New York: Basic Books .
35.
Kenny, D.T., Nelson, P., Butler, T., Lennings, C., Allerton, M., & Champion, U. (2006). Young People on Community Orders Health Survey (YPoCOHS): Key findings report. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
36.
Kenny, D.T., & Press, A.L. (2006). Violence classifications and their impact on observed relationships with key factors in young offenders. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 12, 86-105.
37.
Khoo, A.C.E., & Oakes, P.J. (2000). The variability of the delinquent self: Anti-authority attitudes and endorsement of neutralization techniques among incarcerated delinquents in Singapore. Asian Journal of Social Psychology , 3, 125-132.
38.
Kolstad, A., Gabrielsen, A., & Veisetaune, A.K. (1995). Social psychological consequences of punishment: A comparison of imprisonment and community work. Psychiatry , Psychology and Law, 2, 179-198.
39.
Lemert, E.M. (1967). Human deviance, social problems, and social control . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
Liau, A.K., Barriga, A.Q., & Gibbs, J.C. (1998). Relations between self-serving cognitive distortions and overt vs. covert antisocial behavior in adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 335-346.
Loehlin, J. (1992). Latent variable models. London : Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Marsh, H.W., & Hattie, J. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the structure of self-concept . In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 38-90). New York: John Wiley.
44.
Matsueda, R.L. (1992). Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577-1611.
45.
McCarthy, J.G., & Stewart, A.L. (1998). Neutralization as a process of graduated desensitisation: Moral values of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 278-290.
46.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
47.
Minor, W.W. (1980). The neutralization of criminal offence. Criminology, 18, 103-120.
48.
Minor, W.W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 295-317.
49.
Minor, W.W. (1984). Neutralization as a hardening process: Considerations in the modelling of change. Social Forces, 62, 995-1019.
50.
Mitchell, J., Dodder, R.A., & Norris, T.D. (1990). Neutralization and delinquency: A comparison by sex and ethnicity. Adolescence, 25, 487-497.
51.
Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-710.
52.
Oyserman, D., & Markus, H.R. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 112-125.
53.
Perneger, T.V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236-1238.
54.
Purdie, N., & McCrindle, A. (2004). Measurement of self-concept among indigenous and non-indigenous Australian students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 50-62.
55.
Quinney, R. (1970). The social reality of crime. Boston: Little, Brown.
56.
Ray, M.C., & Downs, W.R. (1986). An empirical test of labeling theory using longitudinal data. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 169-194.
Simourd, D.J., & Olver, M.E. (2002). The future of criminal attitudes research and practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 427-446.
60.
Slaby, R.G., & Guerra, N.G. (1988). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 1. Assessment. Developmental Psychology, 24, 580-588.
61.
Sykes, G.M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency . American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.
62.
Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. New York: Columbia University Press.
63.
Turner, J.C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
Vold, G.B., Bernard, T.J., & Snipes, J.B. (2002). Theoretical criminology (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
Walters, G.D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced inmates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 399-421.
66.
Wells, L.E. (1978). Theories of deviance and the self-concept. Social Psychology, 41, 189-204.
67.
Welzenis, I. van. (1997). The self-concept of societally vulnerable and delinquent boys within the context of school and leisure activities. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 695-705.
68.
Wortley, R. (1986). Neutralizing moral constraint. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 19, 251-258.
