This study compared the predictive validity of multiple indices of violence risk among 188 general population criminal offenders: Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) Violence Risk Assessment Scheme, Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG), Violent Offender Risk Assessment Scale (VORAS), Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), and Screening Version (PCL:SV). Several indices were related to violent recidivism with large statistical effect sizes: HCR-20 (Total, Clinical and Risk Management scales, structured risk judgments), VRAG, and behavioral scales of psychopathy measures. Multivariate analyses showed that HCR-20 indices were consistently related to violence and that the VRAG entered some analyses. Findings are inconsistent with a position of strict actuarial superiority, as HCR-20 structured risk judgments—an index of structured professional or clinical judgment—were as strongly related to violence.
Arbisi, P. A. (2003). Review of the HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence. In B. S. Plake, J. C. Impara, & R. A. Spies (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook [Electronic version]. Retrieved May 7, 2003, from http://www.unl.edu/buros
2.
Augimeri, L. K., Koegl, C. J., Webster, C. D., & Levene, K. S. (2001). Early Assessment Risk List for Boys (EARL-20B): Version 2. Toronto, ON: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre.
3.
Belfrage, H., & Douglas, K. S. (2002). Treatment effects on forensic psychiatric patients measured with the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 25-36.
4.
Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Strand, S. (2000). Prediction of violence using the HCR-20: A prospective study in two maximum-security correctional institutions. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 167-175.
5.
Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
6.
Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): Version 2. Tampa: Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.
7.
Buchanan, A. (2001). Review of the book, HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence, Version 2. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11, S77-S89.
8.
Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. A. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
11.
Cooke, D., & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171-188.
12.
Cooper, C. (2003). Review of the HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence. In B. S. Plake, J. C. Impara, & R. A. Spies (Eds.), The fifteenth mental measurements yearbook [Electronic version]. Retrieved May 7, 2003, from http://www.unl.edu/buros
13.
Cornell, D., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., & Pine, D. (1996). Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 783-790.
14.
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.
15.
Dempster, R. J. (1998). Prediction of sexually violent recidivism: A comparison of risk assessment instruments. Unpublished master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
16.
Dernevik, M., Grann, M., & Johansson, S. (2002). Violent behaviour in forensic psychiatric patients: Risk assessment and different risk management levels using the HCR-20. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 8, 93-111.
17.
de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Hildebrand, M., Bos, B., & van de Ven, P. (2003, April). Different ways of discharge and (risk of) recidivism measured by the HCR-20 and the PCL-R in a sample of treated forensic psychiatric patients. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.
18.
Dolan, M., & Doyle, M. (2000). Violence risk prediction: Clinical and actuarial measures and the role of the Psychopathy Checklist. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 303-311.
19.
Douglas, K. S., & Kropp, P. R. (2002). A prevention-based paradigm for violence risk assessment: Clinical and research applications. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 617-658.
20.
Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Hart, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1372-1379.
21.
Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 917-930.
22.
Douglas, K. S., & Webster, C. D. (1999). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 3-19.
23.
Douglas, K. S., & Weir, J. (2003). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/psychology/groups/faculty/hartviolink.htm
24.
Doyle, M., Dolan, M., & McGovern, J. (2002). The validity of North American risk assessment tools in predicting inpatient violent behaviour in England. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 7, 141-154.
25.
Dunlap, W. P. (1999). A program to compute McGraw and Wong’s common language effect size indicator. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 706-709.
26.
Edens, J. F., & Otto, R. K. (2001). Release decision making and planning. In J. B. Ashford, B. D. Sales, & W. H. Reid (Eds.), Treating adult and juvenile offenders with special needs (pp.335-371). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
Ennis, B. J., & Litwack, T. R. (1974). Psychiatry and the presumption of expertise: Flipping coins in the courtroom. California Law Review, 62, 693-752.
28.
Fleiss, J. L., Williams, J. B., & Dubro, A. F. (1986). The logistic regression analysis of psychiatric data. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 20, 195-209.
29.
Fulero, S. M. (1995). Review of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. In J. C. Conoley & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 453-454). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
30.
Grann, M., Belfrage, H., & Tengström, A. (2000). Actuarial assessment of risk for violence: Predictive validity of the VRAG and the historical part of the HCR-20. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 97-114.
31.
Gray, N. S., Hill, C., McGleish, A., Timmons, D., MacCulloch, M. J., & Snowden, R. J. (2003). Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: A prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 443-451.
32.
Gretton, H., & Abramowitz, C. (2002, March). The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): Comparing contributions of SAVRY items to clinical risk estimates and criminal outcomes. In P. Bartel (Chair), The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): The validity and application of risk assessment in violent youth. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society (Div. 41, APA), Austin, Texas.
33.
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293-323.
34.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
35.
Hanson, R. K. (1998). What do we know about sex offender risk assessment?Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4, 50-72.
36.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
37.
Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
38.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2002). Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 377-394.
39.
Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
40.
Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 121-137.
41.
Hart, S. D., Cox, D. N., & Hare, R. D. (1995). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
42.
Hemphill, J. F., Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139-170.
43.
Howells, K., Watt, B., Hall, G., & Baldwin, S. (1997). Developing programmes for violent offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2, 117-128.
44.
Kozol, H., Boucher, R., & Garofalo, R. (1972). The diagnosis and treatment of dangerousness. Crime and Delinquency, 18, 371-392.
45.
Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
46.
Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101-118.
47.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (3rd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
48.
Landis, J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
49.
Laws, R. (2000, November). Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): A new guide for assessment and management. Symposium presented at the founding conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vancouver, Canada.
50.
Loza, W., Villeneuve, D. B., & Loza-Fanous, A. (2002). Predictive validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide: A tool for assessing violent offenders’ recidivism. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 25, 85-92.
51.
McNiel, D., Gregory, A., Lam, J., Binder, R., & Sullivan, G. (in press). Utility of decision support tools for assessing acute risk of violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
52.
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
54.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Roth, L. H., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 783-792.
56.
Mossman, D. (2000). Evaluating violence risk “by the book”: A review of HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence, Version 2 and the manual for the sexual violence risk-20. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 781-789.
57.
Mossman, D., & Somoza, E. (1991). ROC curves, test accuracy, and the description of diagnostic tests. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 3, 330-333.
58.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, G. T., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
59.
Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 595-605.
60.
Salekin, R. T., Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.
61.
Sjöstedt, G., & Långström, N. (2002). Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A comparison of four different measures. Psychology, Crime & Law, 8, 25-40.
62.
Skeem, J., & Mulvey, E. P. (2001). Psychopathy and community violence among civil psychiatric patients: Results from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 358-374.
63.
Steadman, H. J., & Cocozza, J. (1974). Careers of the criminally insane. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
64.
Strand, S., Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Levander, S. (1999). Clinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders: More important that actuarial data?Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 67-76.
65.
Ward, A., & Dockerill, J. (1999). The predictive accuracy of the Violent Offender Treatment Program Risk Assessment Scale. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 125-140.
66.
Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2). Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
67.
Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Vancouver, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
68.
Witt, P. H. (2000). A practitioner’s view of risk assessment: The HCR-20 and SVR-20. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 791-798.
