The Bay Area Services Network (BASN) provides case management, drug abuse treatment, and links to other health/social services for drug-involved parolees in the San Francisco Bay Area. In a quasi-experimental evaluation, the authors found no difference between BASN and comparison parolees in treatment duration, access to health/social services, drug use days, or criminal recidivism. However, mean scores for dose of case management (number of contacts with case manager) and treatment duration were low among BASN parolees overall. In analyses using BASN parolees only, the authors found those with a stronger case management dose reported fewer drug use days and property offenses. These findings persisted when self-reported abstinence motivation was controlled for as a proxy for self-selection. The effect of case management dose on drug use days was mediated by treatment duration. BASN case management may have had favorable effects on recidivism and drug use when delivered in a sufficient dose.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hodge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F .T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
2.
Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 393-460). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1999). Treatment alternatives to street crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 168-195.
4.
Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. R. (1982). Varieties of criminal behavior (R-2814-NIJ). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
5.
Collins, J. J., Hubbard, R. L., & Rachal, J. V. (1985). Expensive drug use and illegal income. Criminology, 23, 743-764.
6.
Collins, J. J., Hubbard, R. L., Rachal, J. V., Cavanaugh, E. R., & Craddock, S. G. (1982). Criminal justice clients in drug treatment. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
7.
Dowling-Guyer, S., Johnson, M. E., Fisher, D. G., Needle, R., Watters, J., Andersen, M., et al. (1994). Reliability of drug users’ self-reported HIV risk behaviors and validity of self-reported recent drug use. Assessment, 1, 383-392.
8.
Hanlon, T., Nurco, D., Bateman, R., & O’Grady, K. (1999). The relative effects of three approaches to the parole supervision of narcotic addicts and cocaine abusers. The Prison Journal, 79, 163-181.
9.
Inciardi, J. A., Lockwood, D., & Quinlan, J. A. (1993). Drug use in prison: Patterns, processes, and implications for treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 119-129.
10.
Lipton, D. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11.
Marquis, K. H. (1981). Quality of prisoner self-reports: Arrest and conviction response errors. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
12.
Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (1993). A case management treatment program for drug-involved prison releases. The Prison Journal, 73, 319-331.
13.
Martin, S. S., & Inciardi, J. A. (1997). Case management outcomes for drug-involved offenders. The Prison Journal, 77, 168-183.
14.
Martin, S. S., Inciardi, J. A., Scarpitti, F. R., & Nielsen, A. L. (1997). Case management for drug involved parolees: It proved to be a hard ACT to follow. In F. M. Tims, J. A. Inciardi, B. W. Fletcher, & A. M. Horton, Jr. (Eds.), The effectiveness of innovative approaches in the treatment of drug abuse (pp. 115-133). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
15.
Martin, S. S., & Scarpitti, F. R. (1993). An intensive case management approach for paroled IV drug users. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 43-56.
16.
Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Rhodes, W., & Gross, M. (1995). Case management reduces drug use and criminality among drug-involved arrestees: An experimental study of an HIV prevention intervention. (Available from Abt Associates, Inc., 55 Wheeler Street, Cambridge MA 02138)
18.
Simpson, D. D., & Joe, G. W. (1993). Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy, 30, 357-368.
19.
Toborg, M. A., Levin, D. R., Milkman, R. H., & Couter, L. J. (1976). Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) projects: National evaluation program, phase I summary report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
20.
Toch, H. (1995). Case managing multiproblem offenders. Federal Probation, 59, 41-47.
21.
Tyon, L. P. (1988). Final report: Baseline Management and Assessment Data Project. (Available from National Consortium of TASC Programs, 2204 Mt. Vernon Avenue, Suite 200, Alexandria VA 22301)
22.
Weatherby, N., Needle, R., Cesari, H., Booth, R., McCoy, C., Watters, J., et al. (1994). Validity of self-reported drug use among injection drug users and crack cocaine users recruited through street outreach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17, 347-355.
23.
Wexler, H. K., Lipton, D. S., & Johnson, B. D. (1988). A criminal justice system strategy for treating cocaine-heroin abuse offenders in custody. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
