A Multiple-Models Approach to Violence Risk Assessment Among People with Mental Disorder

Abstract

Actuarial models for violencerisk assessment have proliferatedin recent years. In this article, we describe an approach that integrates the predictions of many actuarial risk-assessment models, each of which may capture a different but important facet of the interactive relationship between the measured risk factors and violence. Using this multiple-models approach, we ultimately combined the results of five prediction models generated by the iterative classification tree (ICT) methodology developed in the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study. This combination of models produced results not only superior to those of any of its constituent models, but superior to any other actuarial violence risk-assessment procedure reported in the literature to date.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burgess, E. (1928). Factors determining success or failure on parole. In A. A. Bruce (Ed.), The workings on the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois (pp. 205-248). Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Parole .

Douglas, K., Ogloff, J., Nicholls, T., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 917-930 .

First, M., Spitzer, R., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. (1999). Computer-Assisted SCID-Clinician Version. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems .

First, M., Williams, J., & Spitzer, R. (1998). DTREE: The DSM-IV expert. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems .

Harris, G., Rice, M., & Quinsey, V. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315 .

McNiel, D., Lam, J., & Binder, R. (2000). Relevance of inter-rater agreement to violence risk assessment . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1111-1115 .

Monahan, J., & Steadman, H. (Eds.). (1994). Violence and mental disorder: Developments in risk assessment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .

Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., Silver, E., et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk . British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312-319 .

Monahan, J., Steadman, H., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. New York: Oxford University Press .

10.

Nelson, L. (1977). Tables for testing ordered alternatives in an analysis of variance . Biometrika, 64, 333-336 .

11.

Ohlin, L. (1951). Selection for parole. New York: Russell Sage .

12.

Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .

13.

SPSS. (1993). SPSS for Windows CHAID (Release 6.0). Chicago: SPSS .

14.

Steadman, H., Mulvey, E., Monahan, J., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Grisso, T., et al. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods . Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 393-401 .

15.

Steadman, H., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P., Robbins, P., Mulvey, E., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools . Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83-100 .

16.

Swets, J. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems . Science, 240, 1285-1293 .

17.

Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. (1995). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto, Centre of Criminology .