Relying on statements from Tittle's control balance theory regarding both control deficits and surpluses, the authors developed a framework for understanding how control balance theory could account for victimization. Then, using data collected for the dual purpose of measuring control ratios and victimization experiences, the authors tested the hypothesis that control imbalances predicted victimization. Segmented, nonlinear regression results indicated that even after controlling for routine lifestyle activity and demographic variables, control surpluses and control deficits were positively associated with the probability of both general and predative victimization. Future theoretical and research directions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A. (1998). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2.
Baskin, D. R., & Sommers, I. B. (1998). Casualties of community disorder: Women's careers in violent crime. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
Belknap, J., & Erez, E. (1995). The victimization of women on college campuses: Courtship violence, date rape and sexual harassment. In B. S. Fisher & J. J. Sloan (Eds.), Campus crime: Legal, social, and policy perspectives (pp. 156-178). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
4.
Braithwaite, J. (1997). Charles Tittle's control balance and criminological theory. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 77-97.
5.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
6.
Curry, G. D. (1998). [Review of the book Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance]. Social Forces, 76, 1147-1149.
7.
Fisher, B. S., Sloan, J. J., Cullen, F. T., & Lu, C. (1998). Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology, 36, 671-710.
8.
Gottfredson, M. R. (1981). On the etiology of criminal victimization. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 714-726.
9.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Hickman, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2001). Exploring the relationships between gender, control balance, and deviance. Deviant Behavior, 22, 323-352.
11.
Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12.
Jensen, G. (1999). A critique of control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 339-343.
13.
Jensen, G., & Westphal, L. (1998). Gender and conformity: Submission vs. reasonable choices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Albuquerque, New Mexico.
14.
Jensen, G., & Brownfield, D. (1986). Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity theory. Violence and Victims, 1, 85-99.
15.
Kennedy, L., & Forde, D. (1990). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28, 137-152.
16.
Lauritsen, J. L., & Davis Quinet, K. F. (1995). Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 143-166.
17.
Meier, R. F., & Miethe, T. D. (1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 459-499). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Miethe, T. D., Stafford, M. C., & Stone, D. (1990). Lifestyle changes and risks of criminal victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 6, 357-376.
19.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1985). Applied linear statistical models (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
20.
Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (1999). An empirical test of Tittle's control balance theory. Criminology, 37, 319-341.
21.
Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (2002). The rational choice implications of control balance theory. In A. R. Piquero & S. G. Tibbetts (Eds.), Rational choice and criminal behavior: Current research and future challenges (pp. 131-158). New York: Routledge.
22.
Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2001). Applying Rasch modeling to the validity of a control balance scale. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 493-506.
23.
Reiss, Jr., A. J. (1980). Victim proneness in repeat victimization by type of crime. In S. Fienberg & A. J. Reiss Jr. (Eds.), Indicators of crime and criminal justice: Quantitative studies (pp. 41-53). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
24.
Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A. R., & Jones, P. R. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. Criminology, 37, 427-445.
25.
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.
26.
Savelsberg, J. J. (1996). [Review of the book Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance]. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 620-622.
27.
Savelsberg, J. J. (1999). Human nature and social control in complex society: A critique of Charles Tittle's control balance. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 331-338.
28.
Schreck, C. J. (1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 16, 633-654.
29.
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K., & Coie, J. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Development, 64, 1755-1772.
30.
Schwartz, M. D., & Pitts, V. L. (1995). Exploring a feminist routine activities approach to explaining sexual assault. Justice Quarterly, 12, 9-31.
31.
Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
Simpson, S. S., & Elis, L. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the corporate victimization of women. In E. Szockyj & J. G. Fox (Eds.), Corporate victimization of women (pp. 33-58). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
33.
Singer, S. I. (1997). [Review of the book Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance]. Contemporary Sociology, 26, 492-493.
34.
Sloan, J. J. (1994). The correlates of campus crime: An analysis of reported crimes on college and university campuses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 51-61.
35.
Sparks, R. (1981). Multiple victimization: Evidence, theory, and future research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 762-778.
36.
Tittle, C. R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
37.
Tittle, C. R. (1997). Thoughts stimulated by Braithwaite's analysis of control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 99-110.
