Much research has focused on the ways in which various community and criminal justice agencies attempt to intervene to break the cycle of domestic violence. Ultimately, this is the victim’s decision, yet few researchers have attempted to identify the factors involved in the decision to end an abusive relationship. In particular, researchers have tended to ignore the role offender characteristics may play in this decision. This study, based on interview data collected from domestic violence victims by members of an innovative community-based victim assistance program, suggests that these factors are important. Logistic regression analyses demonstrate that the most important predictors of women attempting to end abusive relationships were (a) when offenders kept weapons in the home and (b) when there had been a formal criminal justice response (i.e., arrest, prosecution) to the violence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, J., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit and probit models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effects of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 8, 698-708.
3.
Berk, R. A., & Newton, P. J. (1985). Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis spouse abuse experiment. American Sociological Review, 50, 253-262.
4.
Berrios, D. C., & Grady, D. (1991). Domestic violence: Risk factors and outcomes. Western Journal of Medicine, 155, 133-135.
5.
Bourg, S., & Stock, H. V. (1994). A review of domestic violence arrest statistics in a police department using a pro-arrest policy: Are pro-arrest policies enough? Journal of Family Violence, 9, 177-189.
6.
Bowker, L., Arbitell, M., & McFarron, J. R. (1988). On the relationship between wife beating and wife abuse. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Brookoff, D. (1997). Drugs, alcohol, and domestic violence in Memphis. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
8.
Brown, J. (1997). Working toward freedom from violence: The process of change in battered women. Violence Against Women, 3, 5-26.
9.
Browne, A., & Williams, K. R. (1993). Gender, intimacy, and lethal violence: Trends from 1976 to 1987. Gender and Society, 7, 78-98.
10.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 743-762.
12.
Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women. (1993). Changing the landscape: Ending violence achieving equity: Final report of the Canadian panel on violence against women. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Service.
13.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
14.
Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., & Cavanaugh, K. (1985). The contact between battered women and social and medical agencies. In J. Pahl (Ed.), Private violence and public policy: The needs of battered women and the response of public services. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
15.
Fagan, J. (1989). Cessation of family violence: Deterrence and discussion. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.), Family violence: Crime and justice, an annual review of research (Vol. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Fagan, R. W., Barnett, O. W., & Patton, J. B. (1988). Reasons for alcohol use in maritally violent men. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 14, 371-392.
17.
Fagan, J., Friedman, E., Wexler, S., & Lewis, V. (1984). The national family violence evaluation: Final report: Vol. 1. Analytic findings. San Francisco: URSA Institute.
18.
Feld, S. L., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Escalation and desistance of wife assault in marriage. Criminology, 27, 141-161.
19.
Ferraro, K. J., & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325-339.
20.
Follingstad, D., Rutledge, L., Berg, B., Hause, E., & Polek, D. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 107-120.
21.
Gelles, R. J. (1976). Abused wives: Why do they stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 659-668.
22.
Giles-Sims, J. (1983). Wife-battering: A systems theory approach. New York: Guilford.
23.
Gondolf, E. W., & Fisher, E. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors: An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
24.
Greenfeld, L. A., Rand, M. R., Craven, D., Flaws, P. A., Perkins, C. A., & Ringel, C., et al. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
25.
Henderson, A. (1990). Children of abused wives: Their influence on their mother’s decisions. Canada’s Mental Health, 38, 10-13.
26.
Hilberman, E., & Munson, K. (1978). Sixty battered women. Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 460-470.
27.
Hirschel, J. D., Hutchinson, I. W., Dean, C. W., & Mills, A. M. (1992). Review essay on the law enforcement response to spouse abuse: Past, present, and future. Justice Quarterly, 9, 247-283.
28.
Hotaling, G., & Sugarman, D. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims, 1, 101-124.
29.
Kantor, G. K., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
30.
Kurz, D. (1996). Separation, divorce, and wife abuse. Violence Against Women, 2, 63-81.
31.
Langan, P. A., & Innes, C. A. (1986). Preventing domestic violence against women. Crime and Justice Facts, 1985. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
32.
Mahoney, M. R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1-94.
33.
McKibben, L., DeVos, E., & Newberger, E. (1989). Victimization of mothers of abused children: A controlled study. Pediatrics, 84, 531-535.
34.
Okun, L. E. (1986). Woman abuse: Facts replacing myths. Albany: SUNY Press.
35.
Pagelow, M. D. (1977). Secondary battering: Breaking the cycle of violence. Domestic Violence, 1978: Hearings before the Subcommittee of Child and Human Development, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
Pagelow, M. D. (1981). Woman-battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.
38.
Pate, A. M., & Hamilton, E. E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review, 57, 691-697.
39.
Ptacek, J. (1998). Why do men batter their wives? R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Roberts, A. (1988). Substance abuse among men who batter their mates: The dangerous mix. Substance Abuse Treatment, 5, 83-87.
41.
Robinson, A. L., & Chandek, M. S. (2000). The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 18-37.
42.
Roy, M. (1977). A research project probing a cross-section of battered women. In M. Roy (Ed.), Battered women: A psychosociological study of domestic violence. New York: Van Nostrand Rienhold.
43.
Schulman, M. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
44.
Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
45.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrests for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
46.
Sherman, L. W., Smith, D. A., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1991). Ghetto poverty, crime, and punishment: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.
47.
Stark, E. (1983). Mandatory arrest: A reply to its critics. American Behavioral Scientists, 36, 620-681.
48.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
49.
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 465-479.
50.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind closed doors: Violence in the American family. New York: Anchor.
51.
Sullivan, C. M. (1991). The provision of advocacy services to women leaving abusive partners: An exploratory study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 45-54.
52.
Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 43-53.
53.
Ulrich, Y. C. (1991). Women’s reasons for leaving abusive spouses. Health Care for Women International, 12, 465-473.
54.
Walker, L. (1978). Battered women and learned helplessness. Victimology: An International Journal, 2, 525-534.
55.
Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.
56.
Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
57.
Wauchope, B. A. (1988). Help-seeking decisions of battered women: A test of learned helplessness and two stress theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society, Durham, New Hampshire.
58.
Willson, P., McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., & Watson, K. (2000). Severity of violence against women by intimate partners and associated use of alcohol and/or illicit drugs by the perpetrator. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 996-1008.
