Judgments about risk and need factors form the basis for important decisions about youths within juvenile justice systems. The judgments are particularly relevant to preadjudicatory diversion and detention actions as well as postadjudication disposition decisions. Research has shown, however, that these judgments are frequently made through informal and unsystematic procedures, and this in turn often results in inconsistency and bias in the decision process. An argument is developed in this article that these processes would be improved with the use of standardized risk and need assessment instruments. Three representative measures are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
2.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
4.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
5.
Baird, S. C. (1984). Classification of juveniles in corrections: A model systems approach. Washington, DC: Arthur D. Little.
6.
Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (1998). Delinquency and justice: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Brandt, J. R., Kennedy, W. A., Patrick, C. J., & Curtin, J. J. (1997). Assessment of psychopathy in population of incarcerated adolescent offenders. Psychological Assessment, 9, 429-435.
8.
Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149-197). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Champion, D. J. (1994). Measuring offender risk: A criminal justice sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
10.
Champion, D. J. (1998). The juvenile justice system: Delinquency, processing, and the law. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Corrado, R. R., & Turnbull, S. D. (1992). A comparative examination of the Modified Justice Model in the United Kingdom and the United States. In R. R. Corrado, N. Bala, R. Linden, & M. Le Blanc (Eds.), Juvenile justice in Canada: A theoretical and analytical assessment(pp. 75-136). Toronto, Canada: Buttersworth.
12.
Costigan, S. M., & Rawana, E. P. (1999, June). Critical evaluation of the long-term validity of the risk/need assessment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
13.
Farrington, D. P. (1997). Early prediction of violent and nonviolent youthful offending. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 5, 51-66.
14.
Forth, A. E. (1995). Psychopathy and young offenders: Prevalence, family background and violence (Program Branch Users Report). Ottawa: Minister of the Solicitor General Canada.
15.
Forth, A. E., & Burke, H. C. (1998). Psychopathy in adolescence: Assessment, violence and developmental precursors. In D. J. Cooke, A. E. Forth, & R. D. Hare (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 205-229). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
16.
Garb, H. N. (1989). Clinical judgment, clinical training, and professional experience. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 387-396.
17.
Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward a rational exercise of discretion. New York: Plenum.
19.
Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarastota, FL: Personal Resource Press.
20.
Grisso, T., Tomkins, A., & Casey, P. (1988). Procedural issues in the juvenile justice system. In N. Reppucci, L. Weithorn, E. Mulvey, & J. Monohan (Eds.), Children, mental health, and the law (pp. 171-193). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical vs. mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
22.
Hare, R. D. (1991). The Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
23.
Hare, R. D., Forth, A., & Kosson, D. S. (1994). The Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version.Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia, Department of Psychology.
24.
Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., & Harachi, T. W. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Henggeler, S. W. (1991). Multidimensional causal models of delinquent behavior and their implications for treatment. In R. Cohen & A. Siegel (Eds.), Context and development(pp. 161-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Hodges, K. (1994). Manual for the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Ypsilanti: Eastern Michigan University, Department of Psychology.
27.
Hodges, K. (1999). Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (2nd ed., pp. 631-660). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Hodges, K., & Gust, J. (1995). Measures of impairment for children and adolescents. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 403-413.
29.
Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 445-467.
30.
Hodges, K., Wong, M. M., & Latessa, M. (1998). Use of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) as an outcome measure in clinical settings. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 25, 326-337.
31.
Hoge, R. D. (1999a). An expanded role for psychological assessments in juvenile justice systems. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 251-266.
32.
Hoge, R. D. (1999b). Assessing adolescents in educational, counseling, and other settings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Hoge, R. D. (2001). The juvenile offender: Theory, research, and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
34.
Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1996a). Assessing the youthful offender: Issues and techniques. New York: Plenum.
35.
Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (1996b, August). Assessing risk and need factors in the youthful offender. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
36.
Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2002). The Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory manual and scoring key. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
37.
Hoge, R. D., Andrews, D. A., & Leschied, A. (1996). An investigation of risk and protective factors in a sample of youthful offenders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 419-424.
38.
Johnson, J. B., & Secret, P. E. (1995). The effects of court structure on juvenile court decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 63-82.
39.
Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (1999). Risk-need assessment of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 69-89.
40.
Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (2000, June). The interrater reliability of the Ministry Risk/Need Assessment Form for juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Ottawa.
41.
Krisberg, B., & Howell, J. C. (1998). The impact of the juvenile justice system and prospects for graduated sanctions in a comprehensive strategy. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.),Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 346-366). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
Krisberg, B., Onek, D., Jones, M., & Schwartz, I. (1993). Juveniles in state custody: Prospects for community-based care of troubled adolescents. San Fransicso: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
43.
Le Blanc, M. (1998). Screening of serious and violent juvenile offenders: Identification, classification, and prediction. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 167-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. J. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
47.
Loeber, R., & Hay, D. F. (1994). Developmental approaches to aggression and conduct problems. In M. Rutter & D. F. Hay (Eds.), Development through life: A handbook for clinicians(pp. 488-515). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48.
Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
49.
Minor, K. I., Hartmann, D. J., & Terry, S. (1997). Predictors of juvenile court actions and recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 328-344.
50.
Mulvey, E. P., & Saunders, J. T. (1982). Juvenile detention criteria: State of the art and guidelines for change. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 14, 261-289.
51.
Palmer, T. (1996). Programmatic and nonprogrammatic aspects of successful intervention. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 131-182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Poluchowicz, S., Jung, S., & Rawana, E. P. (2000, June). The interrater reliability of the Ministry Risk/Need Assessment form for juvenile offenders. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal, Quebec.
53.
Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., & Cormier, C. (1998). Violent offenders: Assessing and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54.
Reitsma-Street, M., & Leschied, A. (1988). The Conceptual-Level Matching Model in corrections. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 92-108.
55.
Sanborn, J. B. (1996). Factors perceived to affect delinquent dispositions in juvenile court: Putting the sentencing decision into context. Crime & Delinquency, 42,99-113.
56.
Schissel, B. (1993). Social dimensions of Canadian youth justice. Toronto, Canada: Oxford.
57.
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Zhang, Q., van Kammen, W., & Maguin, E. (1993). The double edge of protective and risk factors for delinquency: Interrelations and developmental patterns. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 683-701.
58.
Towberman, D. B. (1992). National survey of juvenile needs assessment. Crime & Delinquency,38, 230-238.
59.
Wiebush, R. G., Baird, C., Krisberg, B., & Onek, D. (1995). Risk assessment and classification for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. In J. C. Howell, B. F. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, & J. J. Wilson (Eds.), A sourcebook: Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. (pp. 171-212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
