The declaration that the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) is the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk prediction is challenged. It is argued that such an assertion reflects an ethnocentric view of research in the area and has led to unsubstantiated claims based on incomplete attempts at knowledge cumulation. In fact, another more comprehensive risk measure, the Level of Service Inventory–Revised, notably surpasses the PCL-R in predicting general (φ = .37 vs. .23) and violent recidivism, albeit only modestly so in the case of the latter (φ = .26 vs. .21). In addition, other problematic issues regarding the PCL-R are outlined. Finally, it is suggested that a more useful role for psychopathy in offender risk assessment may be in terms of the responsivity dimension in case management. Finally, the authors suggest further research directions that will aid in knowledge cumulation regarding the general utility of offender risk measures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association . (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Andrews, D. , & Bonta. J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
Andrews, D. , & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
4.
Baird, C. S. (1981). Probation and parole classification: The Wisconsin model. Corrections Today, 43, 36-41.
5.
Blackburn, R. (1993). The psychology of criminal conduct. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
6.
Bonta, J. (2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 355-379.
7.
Bonta, J. , Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
8.
Bonta, J. , Zinger, I., Harris, A., & Carrière, D. (1998). The dangerous offender provisions: Are they targeting the right offenders?Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40, 377-400.
9.
Boothby, J. L. , & Clements, C. B. (2000). A national survey of correctional psychologists. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 715-731.
10.
Brown, S. L. , Zamble, E., Gendreau, P., & Koltlarz, J. (2000, September). Assessment and case planning of male offenders in community corrections. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Conference of the International Community Corrections Association, Ottawa, Canada.
11.
Burke, H. (1997). [LSI-R data]. Unpublished raw data.
12.
Cohen, M. A. (1998). The monetary value of saving a high-risk youth. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 5-32.
13.
Cooke, D. J. , & Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Psychological Assessment, 9, 3-14.
14.
Cullen, F. T. , & Gendreau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. Prison Journal, 81, 312-337.
15.
Cullen, F. T. , Gendreau, P., Jarjoura, G. R., & Wright, J. P. (1997). Crime and the bell curve: Lessons from intelligent criminology. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 387-411.
16.
Edens, J. F. (2001). Misuses of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in court: Two case examples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1082-1093.
17.
Edens, J. F. , Skeem, J. L., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of “juvenile psychopathy” and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 53-80.
18.
Forth, A. E. , & Burke, H. C. (1998). Psychopathy in adolescence: assessment, violence, and developmental precursors. In D. J. Cooke, A. E. Forth, & R. D. Hare (Eds.), Psychopathy: Theory, research and implications for society (pp. 205-229). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
19.
Gallagher, R. W. , Somaru, D. P., & Ben-Purath, Y. S. (1999). Current usage of psychological tests in state correctional settings. Corrections Compendium, 24, 1-3, 20.
20.
Gendreau, P. (1975). Psychological test usage in corrections in English-speaking Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 17, 215-220.
21.
Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144-161.
22.
Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. (1998). Enhancing community supervision practices: A proposal. Unpublished manuscript, Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of New Brunswick at Saint John.
23.
Gendreau, P. , Goggin, C., Cullen, F. T., & Paparozzi, M. (in press). The common sense revolution and correctional policy. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programs and policies to reduce re-offending. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
24.
Gendreau, P. , Goggin, C., & Paparozzi, M. (1996). Principles of effective assessment for community corrections. Federal Probation, 60, 64-70.
25.
Gendreau, P. , Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). Predicting recidivism: LSI-R vs. PCL-R. Canadian Psychology Abstracts, 40,2a-2a.
26.
Gendreau, P. , Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2000). Cumulating knowledge: How meta-analysis can serve the needs of correctional clinicians and policy-makers. Compendium of Effective Correctional Programs (Vol. 3). Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada.
27.
Gendreau, P., Gupta, R., Smith, P., & Goggin, C. (2001). Catching up is hard to do: Fail safe statistics to overturn conclusions regarding the utility of prediction and treatment research. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Brunswick at Saint John.
28.
Gendreau, P. , Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works?Criminology, 34, 575-607.
29.
Goggin, C. , Gendreau, P., & Gray, G. (1998). Case need domain: Associates and social interaction. Forum on Corrections Research, 10, 24-27.
30.
Gough, H. (1957). Manual for the California psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31.
Hanson, R. K. , Gordon, A., Harris, A. J. R., Marques, J. K., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V. L., & Seto, M. C. (2000). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders. San Diego, CA: ATSA Collaborative Data Research Committee Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.
32.
Hare, R. D. (1980). A research scale for the assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111-119.
33.
Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25-54.
34.
Hare, R. D. (1998). The Hare PCL-R: Some issues concerning its use and misuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 99-119.
35.
Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
36.
Harris, G. T. , Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315-335.
37.
Harris, G. T. , Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). Psychopathy as a taxon: Evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 387-397.
38.
Heer, J. (2001, January 13). My Canada includes better book reviews. National Post, pp. B7, B9.
39.
Hedges, L. V. , & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
Hemphill, J. F. , Hare, R. D., & Wong, S. (1998). Psychopathy and recidivism: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 139-170.
41.
Hercz, R. (2001, September 8). Psychopaths among us. Saturday Night, 116, 22-29.
42.
Hoffman, P. B. , & Beck, J. L. (1974). Parole decision-making: A salient factor score. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 539-547.
43.
Kosson, D. S. , Steuerwald, B. L., Forth, A. E., & Kirkhart, K. S. (1997). A new method for assessing the interpersonal behavior of psychopathic individuals: Preliminary validation studies. Psychological Assessment, 9, 89-101.
44.
Ley, P. (1972). Quantitative aspects of psychological assessment: An introduction. London: Duckworth.
45.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
Loza, W. , & Simourd, D. J. (1994). Psychometric evaluation of the Level of Service Inventory (LSI) among male Canadian federal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 468-480.
47.
Lynam, D. R. (1997). Pursuing the psychopath: Capturing the fledgling psychopaths in the nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 425-438.
48.
McGraw, K. O. , & Wong, S. P. (1992). A common language effect size. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 361-365.
49.
Rigelhof, T. F. (2000). This is our writing. Erin, Canada: The Porcupine's Quill.
50.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Salekin, R. T. , Rogers, R., & Sewell, K. W. (1996). A review and meta-analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: Predictive validity of dangerousness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 203-215.
52.
Schmidt, F. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
53.
Schmidt, F. L. , & Hunter, J. F. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
54.
Serin, R. C. (1995). Treatment responsivity in criminal psychopaths. Forum on Corrections Research, 7, 23-26.
55.
Serin, R. C. , & Brown, S. L. (2000). The clinical use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in contemporary risk assessment. In C. Gacono (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner's guide (pp. 251-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Serin, R. C. , Malcolm, P. B., Khanna, A., & Barbaree, H. E. (1994). Psychopathy and deviant sexual arousal in incarcerated sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 3-11.
57.
Simourd, D. J., Bonta, J., Andrews, D. A., & Hoge, R. D. (1991). Criterion validity of assessments of psychopathy: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
58.
Simourd, D. J. , & Hoge, R. D. (2000). Criminal psychopathy: A risk-and-need perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 256-272.
59.
Skilling, T. , Quinsey, V. L., & Craig, W. A. (2001). Evidence of a taxon underlying serious anti-social behavior in boys. Criminal Justice and Behavior,28, 450-470.
60.
Webster, C. (1999). Risk assessment and risk management with women offenders. Ottawa, Canada:National Parole Board.
61.
Yeaton, W. H. , & Wortman, P. M. (1993). On the reliability of meta-analytic reviews: The role of intercoder agreement. Evaluation Review, 17, 292-309.
62.
Zinger, I. , & Forth, A. E. (1998). Psychopathy and Canadian criminal proceedings: The potential for human rights abuses. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 40, 237-276.
