This study used a large recidivism data set to develop and validate a multiple models tool for predicting recidivism risk. Consistent with prior research, the authors found that the multiple models tool was more accurate than tools built using the traditional single-model approach. In addition, they demonstrated that the predicted recidivism rates produced by the multiple models tool could be summarized in a usable format consisting of four to five statistically distinct risk classes offering an impressive degree of base-rate dispersion. Given that public protection ranks as a primary focal concern of judges, the authors believe that their results justify renewed attention to the potential uses of actuarial tools within the context of judicial decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appelbaum, P. S. (1997). Almost a revolution: An international perspective on the law of involuntary commitment. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25, 135-147.
2.
Auerhahn, K. (1999). Selective incapacitation and the problem of prediction. Criminology, 37, 703-734.
3.
Banks, S., Robbins, P. C., Silver, E., Vesselinov, R., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., et al. (in press). Criminal Justice and Behavior.
4.
Blackmore, J., & Welsh, J. (1983). Selective incapacitation: Sentencing according to risk. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 504-529.
5.
Brennan, T. (1987). Classification: An overview of selected methodological issues. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making (pp. 201-248). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Chaiken, J., & Chaiken, M. (1984). Offender types and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 30, 195-226.
7.
Chaiken, J., Chaiken, M., & Rhodes, W. (1993). Predicting violent behavior and classifying violent offenders. In A. Reiss and J. Roth (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence (Vol. 4, pp. 217-295). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Cohen, J. (1983). Incapacitation as a strategy for crime control: Possibilities and pitfalls. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Skokie, IL: Rand McNally.
10.
Farrington, D. P., & Tarling, R. (1985). Prediction in criminology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
First, M., Spitzer, R., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. (1999). Computer-Assisted SCID—Clinical Version. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
12.
First, M., Williams, J., & Spitzer, R. (1998). DTREE: The DSM-IV expert. North Tonowanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
13.
Gottfredson, D. M., & Tonry, M. (1987). Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1987). Decision making in criminal justice: Toward the rational exercise of discretion. New York: Plenum.
15.
Gottfredson, S. D., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1985). Selective incapacitation?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 478, 135-149.
16.
Gottfredson, S. D., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1994). Behavioral prediction and the problem of incapacitation. Criminology, 32, 441-474.
17.
Greenwood, P. W., & Abrahamse, A. (1982). Selective incapacitation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
18.
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1992). Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence?Law and Human Behavior, 16, 621-633.
19.
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 293-323.
20.
Hoffman, P. B. (1983). Screening for risk: A revised Salient Factor Score (SFS 81). Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 539-547.
21.
Janus, M. (1985). Selective incapacitation: Have we tried it? Does it work?Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 117-129.
22.
Menzies, R., Webster, C. D., McMain, S., Staley, S., & Scaglione, R. (1994). The dimensions of dangerousness revisited: Assessing forensic predictions about future violence. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 1-28.
23.
Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Silver, E., et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312-319.
25.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur Study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1998). Social Science in the Law (4th ed.). Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
27.
National Institute of Justice. (1992). Data resources of the National Institute of Justice (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Ohlin, L. (1951). Selection for parole. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1987). Guideline-based justice: Prediction and racial minorities. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making (pp. 151-181). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
Silver, E. (2000). Extending social disorganization theory: A multilevel approach to the study of violence among persons with mental illnesses. Criminology, 38, 1043-1074.
32.
Silver, E., & Miller, L. L. (2002). A cautionary note on the use of actuarial tools for social control. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 138-161.
33.
Silver, E., Mulvey, E. P., & Monahan, J. (1999). Assessing violence risk among discharged psychiatric patients: Toward an ecological approach. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 237-255.
34.
Silver, E., Smith, W. R., & Banks, S. (2000). Constructing actuarial devices for predicting recidivism: A comparison of methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 733-764.
35.
Smith, W. R. (1996). The effects of base rate and cutoff point choice on commonly used measures of association and accuracy in recidivism research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 83-111.
36.
Smith, W. R., & Smith, D. R. (1998). The consequences of error: Recidivism prediction and civil-libertarian ratios. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 481-502.
37.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows CHAID. (1993). SPSS, Inc.
38.
Steadman, H., Mulvey, E., Monahan, J., Robbins, P., Appelbaum, P., Grisso, T., et al. (1998). Violence by people discharged from acute psychiatric inpatient facilities and by others in the same neighborhoods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 393-401.
39.
Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2000). A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 83-100.
40.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
41.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
42.
Swets, J., Dawes, R., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1-26.
43.
Tonry, M. (1987). Prediction and classification: Legal and ethical issues. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making (pp. 367-413). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383-408.
45.
Underwood, B. D. (1979). Law and the crystal ball: Predicting behavior with statistical inference and individualized judgment. Yale Law Journal, 88, 1408-1428.
46.
von Hirsch, A., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1984). Selective incapacitation: Some queries on research design and equity. Review of Law and Social Change, 12, 11-51.
47.
Walker, S. (1998). Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A policy guide. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
48.
Wilkins, L. T. (1985). The politics of prediction. In D. P. Farrington & R. Tarling (Eds.), Prediction in criminology (pp. 34-51). Albany: State University of New York Press.
