Public perception of a biased news media, particularly media biased in a liberal direction, has increased over the past 3 presidential elections. To examine what might be influencing this public opinion, the authors look at shifts in public perception of media bias, press coverage of the topic of media bias, and the balance in valence coverage of presidential candidates—all during the 1988, 1992, and 1996 presidential elections. Their results suggest that the rise in public perception that news media are liberally biased is not the result of bias in valence news coverage of the candidates, but, rather, due to increasing news self-coverage that focuses on the general topic of bias in news content. Furthermore, the increased claims of media bias come primarily from conservative elites who have proclaimed a liberal bias that is viewed as including the entire media industry.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alter, J.
(1993, February 8). The manic-depressive media. Newsweek, 29.
2.
Altheide, D.
, & Snow, R. (1991). Media worlds in the post-journalism era. New York: deGruyter.
3.
Bagdikian, B. H.
(1997). The media monopoly (5th ed.). Boston: Beacon.
4.
Beck, P. A.
(1991). Voters' intermediation environments in the 1988 presidential contest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 371-394.
5.
Becker, L. B.
, & Kosicki, G. M. (1995). Understanding the message-producer/message-receiver transaction. In P. Blackburn (Ed.), Research in Political Sociology (pp. 33-62). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6.
Becker, L. B.
, Whitney, D. C., & Collins, E. L. (1980). Public understanding of how the news media operate. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 571-578, 605.
7.
Bennett, W. L.
(1992). The governing crisis. New York: St. Martin's.
8.
Bozell, L. B., III.
(1995, June 12). The official media versus the GOP. National Review, 47(11), 46-48.
9.
Broder, D.
(1987). Behind the front page: A candid look at how news is made. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
Buchanan, B.
(1991). Electing a president: The Markle Commission report on campaign `88. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11.
Cappella, J. N.
, & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). The spiral of cynicism. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Cheney, L.
(1996). Press bias in the `92 election. American Enterprise, 7(2), 36-37.
13.
Converse, P. E.
(1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
14.
Cook, T. E.
(1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Dalton, R. J.
, Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 111-126.
16.
Dennis, E. E.
(1997). How “liberal” are the media anyway? The continual conflict of professionalism and partisanship. Journal of Press / Politics, 2(4), 115-119.
17.
Dickson, S. H.
(1994). Understanding media bias: The press and the U.S. invasion of Panama. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 809-819.
18.
Dionne, E. J.
(1991). Why Americans hate politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19.
Domke, D.
, Fan, D. P., Fibison, M., Shah, D. V., Smith, S. S., & Watts, M. D. (1997) News media, candidates and issues, and public opinion in the 1996 presidential campaign. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 718-737.
20.
Dowd, M.
(1988, August 19). For the Republicans, a final day of boos and hisses and hugs and kisses. New York Times, p. A15.
21.
Duck, J. M.
, Terry, J. T., & Hogg, M. A. (1997). Perceptions of a media campaign: The role of social group identity and the changing intergroup context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(1), 3-24.
22.
Efron, E.
(1971). News twisters. Los Angeles: Nash.
23.
Entman, R. M.
(1996). Reporting environmental policy debate: The real media bias. Journal of Press / Politics, 1(3), 77-92.
24.
Epstein, E. J.
(1973). News from nowhere: Television and the news. New York: Random House.
25.
Falk, W. B.
(1998). Louder and louder: A look at how talk radio has elbowed its way into media prominence. In C. Harper (Ed.), What's next in mass communication: Readings on media and culture (pp. 37-39). New York: St. Martin's Press.
26.
Fallows, J
. (1996). Breaking the news: How the media undermine American democracy. New York: Pantheon.
27.
Fan, D. P.
(1988). Predictions of public opinion from the mass media. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
28.
Fan, D. P.
(1966). Predictions of the Bush-Clinton-Perot presidential race from the press. Political Analysis, 6(1), 67-105.
29.
Fan, D. P.
, & Tims, A. R. (1989). The impact of the news media on public opinion: American presidential elections 1987-1988. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 1(2), 151-163.
30.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Fredin, E. S.
, & Kosicki, G. M. (1989). Cognitions and attitudes about community: Compensating for media images. Journalism Quarterly, 66(3), 571-578.
32.
Fredin, E. S.
, Kosicki, G. M., & Becker, L. B. (1996). Cognitive strategies for media use during a presidential campaign. Political Communication, 13(1), 23-42.
33.
Gans, H. J.
(1985). Are U.S. journalists dangerously liberal?Columbia Journalism Review, 24(6), 29-33.
34.
Gaziano, C.
(1988). How credible is the credibility crisis?Journalism Quarterly, 65, 267-278.
35.
Gaziano, C.
, & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451-462.
36.
Gitlin, T.
(1991). Blips, bytes and savvy talk: Television's impact on American politics. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Communication and citizenship (pp. 119-136). London: Routledge.
37.
Graber, D. A.
(1988). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
38.
Graber, D. A.
(1996). Mass media and American politics (5th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
39.
Gunther, A. C.
(1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 279-287.
40.
Gunther, A. C.
(1992). Biased press or biased public?: Attitudes towards media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167.
41.
Hallin, D. C.
(1989). The uncensored war: The media and Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Hart, R. P.
(1994). Seducing America: How television charms the modern voter. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Hetherington, M. J.
(1996). The media's role in forming voters' national economic evaluations in 1992. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 372-395.
44.
Hofstetter, C. R.
(1976). Bias in the news: Network television news coverage of the 1972 election campaign. Columbus: Ohio State University.
45.
How the public uses the media
(1996, October/November). The Public Perspective, 7, 11-14.
46.
Hume, B.
(1993, January). The Bush crack-up. The American Spectator, 26, 22-27.
47.
Izard, R. S.
(1985). Public confidence in the news media. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 247-255.
48.
Jamieson, K. H.
(1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Jasperson, A. E.
, Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Faber, R. J., & Fan, D. P. (1998). Framing and the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15, 205-224.
50.
Johnson, T. J.
, Boudreau, T., with Glowaki, C. (1996). Turning the spotlight inward: How leading news organizations covered the media in the 1992 presidential election. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 657-671.
51.
Just, M. R.
, Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. J., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
Kenney, K.
, & Simpson, C. (1993). Was coverage of the 1988 presidential race by Washington's two major dailies biased?Journalism Quarterly, 70, 345-355.
53.
Kerbel, M. R.
(1995). Remote and controlled: Media politics in a cynical age. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
54.
Kosicki, G. M.
, Becker, L. B., & Fredin, E. S. (1994). Buses and ballots: The role of media images in a local election. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 76-89.
55.
Kosicki, G. M.
, & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass communication and political information processing (pp. 69-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Kuklinski, J. H.
, & Hurley, N. L. (1994). On hearing and interpreting political messages: A cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking. Journal of Politics, 56, 729-751.
57.
Kuklinski, J. H.
, & Sigelman, L. (1992). When objectivity is not objective: Network television news coverage of U.S. senators and the “paradox of objectivity.”Journal of Politics, 54, 810-833.
58.
Kurtz, H.
(1996, October 28). Media notes: Taking on the Times. Washington Post, p. D1.
59.
Lemert, J. B.
(1989). Criticizing the media: Empirical approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Lichter, S. R.
(1996, March/April). Will Americans turn off a crusading press?American Enterprise, 37-38.
61.
Lichter, S. R.
, Amundson, D., & Noyes, R. (1988). The video campaign: Network coverage of the 1988 primaries. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
62.
Lichter, S. R.
, & Noyes, R. E. (1996) Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
63.
Lipset, S. M.
, & Schneider W. (1987). The confidence gap (Rev. ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
64.
Lowry, D. T.
, & Shidler, J. A. (1995). The sound bites, the biters, and the bitten: An analysis of network TV news bias in campaign `92. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 33-44.
65.
McLeod, J. M.
, Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, D. M. (1994). The expanding boundaries of political communication effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 123-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
McLeod, J. M.
, Kosicki, G. M., & Pan, Z. (1991). On understanding and misunderstanding media effects. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 235-266). London: Edward Arnold.
67.
Mindich, D.T.Z.
(1998). Just the facts: How “objectivity” came to define American journalism. New York: New York University Press.
68.
Mondak, J.
(1993). Source cues and policy approval: The cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 186-212.
69.
Patterson, T. E.
(1993). Out of order. New York: Knopf.
70.
Patterson, T. E.
, & Donsbach, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13, 455-468.
71.
Reeves, R.
(1997). The question of media bias. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.), Do the media govern? Politicians, voters, and reporters in America (pp. 40-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
Rhee, J. W.
(1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26-48.
73.
Rimmer, T.
, & Weaver, D. (1987). Different questions, different answers. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 28-44.
74.
Robinson, M. J.
(1975). American political legitimacy in an era of electronic journalism. In D. Cater & R. Adler (Eds.), Television as a social force: New approaches to TV criticism (pp. 97-141). New York: Praeger.
75.
Robinson, M. J.
, & Sheehan, M. (1983). Over the wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in campaign `80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
76.
Rothman, S.
, & Lichter, S. R. (1987). Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy. American Political Science Review, 81, 383-404.
77.
Schudson, M.
(1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
78.
Scott, W. A.
(1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
79.
Shah, D. V.
, Watts, M. D., Domke, D., Fan, D. P., & Fibison, M. (in press). News coverage, economic cues, and the public's presidential preferences: 1984-1996. Journal of Politics.
80.
Sniderman, P. M.
, Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
81.
Stovall, J.
(1988). Coverage of the 1984 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 443-449.
82.
Tolchin, S. J.
(1996). The angry American: How voter rage is changing the nation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
83.
Tuchman, G.
(1972). Objectivity as a strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen's notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77, 660-670.
84.
Vallone, R. P.
, Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perceptions and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577-585.
85.
Watts, M. D. (1997). Framing Congress: Media coverage of the U.S. Congress and its impact on public opinion (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 1901.
86.
Zaller, J. R.
(1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
