Although the obstacle hypothesis has proven useful in understanding communication choices during request sequences, its utility is limited by the lack of explication of the obstacle construct. This article examines the types of obstacles that may be perceived and dimensions that differentiate them. Results suggest that six types of obstacles—possession, imposition, inappropriateness, postpone, no incentive, and recalcitrance—are perceived by individuals in request interactions. These obstacles appear to be distinguishable in the degree to which they reflect unwillingness to comply, inability to comply, and personal characteristics of the requester. The discussion section explores the implications of this conceptualization on understanding request interactions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldenderfer, M. S.
, & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-044). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Berg, J. H.
, Piner, K. E., & Frank, S. M. (1993). Resource theory and close relationships. In U. G. Foa, J. Converse Jr., K. Y. Tornblom, & E. B. Foa (Eds.), Resource theory: Explanations and applications (pp. 169-196). San Diego: Academic Press.
3.
Clark, R. A.
, & Delia, J. G. (1979). Topoi and rhetorical competence. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 187-206.
4.
Cody, M. J.
, McLaughlin, M. L., & Jordan, W. J. (1980). A multidimensional scaling of three sets of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Quarterly, 28, 34-46.
5.
deTurck, M. A.
(1985). A transactional analysis of compliance-gaining behavior: Effects of noncompliance, relational contexts, and actors' gender. Human Communication Research, 12, 54-78.
6.
Dillard, J. P.
(1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
7.
Dillard, J. P.
, & Burgoon, M. (1985). Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52, 289-304.
8.
Falbo, T.
(1977). Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 537-547.
9.
Falbo, T.
, & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618-628.
10.
Foa, U. G.
, & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
11.
Folkes, V. S.
(1982). Communicating the reasons for social rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 235-252.
12.
Francik, E. P.
, & Clark, H. H. (1985). How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 560-568.
13.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(1981). Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 431-444.
14.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
(1986). What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 181-196.
15.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
, & Mueller, R.A.G. (1988). Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts. Discourse Processes, 11, 101-116.
16.
Ifert, D. E.
, & Roloff, M. E. (1994). Anticipated obstacles to compliance: Predictors of their presence and expression. Communication Studies, 45, 120-130.
17.
Ifert, D. E.
, & Roloff, M. E. (1996). Responding to rejected requests: Persistence and response types as functions of obstacles to compliance. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 40-58.
18.
Jacobs, S.
, & Jackson, S. (1981). Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 118-132.
19.
Kellermann, K.
, Reynolds, R., & Chen, J. B. (1991). Strategies of conversational retreat: When parting is not sweet sorrow. Communication Monographs, 58, 362-383.
20.
Kemper, S.
, & Thissen, D. (1981). Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 552-563.
21.
Kruskal, J. B.
, & Wish, M. (1977). Multidimensional scaling (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-011). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
McLaughlin, M. L.
, Cody, M. J., Dickson, R., & Manusov, V. (1992). Accounting for failure to follow advice: Real reasons versus good explanations. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one's self to others: Reason-giving in a social context (pp. 281-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
McLaughlin, M. L.
, Cody, M. J., & Robey, C. S. (1980). Situational influences on the selection of strategies to resist compliance-gaining attempts. Human Communication Research, 7, 14-36.
24.
Miller, G. R.
, Boster, F. J., Roloff, M. E., & Seibold, D. R. (1977). Compliancegaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
25.
Mojena, R.
(1977). Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules—an evaluation. Computer Journal, 20, 359-363.
26.
Roloff, M. E.
, & Janiszewski, C. A. (1989). Overcoming obstacles to interpersonal compliance: A principle of message construction. Human Communication Research, 16, 33-61.
27.
Searle, J. R.
(1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Weiner, B.
(1972). Theories of motivation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
29.
Weiner, B.
(1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
30.
Wilson, S. R.
, Cruz, M. G., Marshall, L. J., & Rao, N. (1993). An attributional analysis of compliance-gaining interactions. Communication Monographs, 60, 352-372.
31.
Wiseman, R. L.
, & Schenck-Hamlin, W. J. (1981). A multidimensional scaling of an inductively-derived set of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Monographs, 48, 251-270.
