Organizational downsizing places many strains on surviving employees. Despite the implicit relationship between changes to communication networks and employee responses, few studies examine downsizing-induced network changes or the impact of these changes on employees. This longitudinal investigation examined fluctuations in structural holes within a hospitality company's corporate headquarters resulting from the loss and gain of communication contacts. Building on Burt's treatise on structural holes, we tested a measurement of structural holes and its relationship to layoff survivors' perceptions of organizational chaos and their willingness to participate in planned, postdownsizing changes. Although the downsizing had a modest impact on surviving employees' structural hole experiences overall, the structural hole index was a significant predictor in longitudinal and within time period comparisons of employees' perceptions of chaos and openness to change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowerman, B. L.
, & O'Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent.
2.
Brass, D. J.
, & Burkhardt, M. E. (1992). Centrality and power in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations, structure, form and action (pp. 191-215). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
3.
Brass, D. J.
, & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential power and use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 441-470.
4.
Brockner, J.
(1988). The effects of work layoffs on survivors: Research, theory, and practice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 213-255.
5.
Bruton, G. D.
, Keels, J. K., & Shook, C. L. (1996). Downsizing the firm: Answering the strategic questions. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 38-45.
6.
Burt, R. S.
(1991). Structure reference manual version 4.2. New York: Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University.
7.
Burt, R. S.
(1992a). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations, structure, form and action (pp. 57-91). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
Burt, R. S.
(1992b). Structural holes, the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Burt, R. S.
, & Schott, T. (1985). Relation contents in multiple networks. Social Science Research, 14, 287-308.
10.
Cameron, K. S. (in press). Strategic organizational downsizing: An extreme case—Pt. 1. Research in Organizational Behavior.
11.
Cameron, K. S.
, Freeman, S. J., & Mishra, A. K. (1991). Best practices in white collar downsizing: Managing contradictions. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 57-73.
12.
Cascio, W. F.
(1993). Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned?Academy of Management Executive, 7, 95-104.
13.
Cronbach, L.
(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
14.
Cronbach, L.
, & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity of psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
15.
Freeman, L. C.
(1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 2, 215-239.
16.
Freeman, S. J.
, & Cameron, K. S. (1993). Organizational downsizing: A convergence and reorientation framework. Organization Science, 4, 10-29.
17.
Friedkin, N. E.
(1993). Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: A longitudinal study. American Sociological Review, 58, 861-872.
18.
Gottlieb, M. R.
, & Conkling, L. (1995). Managing the workplace survivors: Organizational downsizing and the commitment gap. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
19.
Granovetter, M. S.
(1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
20.
Granovetter, M. S.
(1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 105-130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Gutknecht, J. E.
, & Keys, J. B. (1993). Mergers, acquisitions and takeovers: Maintaining morale of survivors and protecting employees. Academy of Management Executive, 7(2), 26-36.
22.
Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis: A program in basic. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
23.
Hartman, R. L.
, & Johnson, J. D. (1989). Social contagion and multiplexity: Communication networks as predictors of commitment and role ambiguity. Human Communication Research, 15, 523-548.
24.
Hartman, R. L.
, & Johnson, J. D. (1990). Formal and informal group communication structures: An examination of their relationship to role ambiguity. Social Networks, 12, 1-24.
25.
Hubert, L.
, & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignment procedure as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29, 190-241.
26.
Hunter, J. E.
, & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267-320.
27.
Ibarra, H.
(1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471-501.
28.
Ibarra, H.
(1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
29.
Indik, B. P.
(1965). Organization size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations, 18, 339-350.
30.
Jablin, F. M.
(1987). Formal organization structure. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 389-419). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Johnson, J. D.
(1985, May). Effects of communicative response satisfaction and work dependency on communication frequency over time. Paper presented to the Organizational Communication Division at the International Communication Association Annual Convention, Honolulu, HI.
32.
Johnson, J. D.
(1993). Organizational communication structure. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
Johnson, J. D.
, Meyer, M. E., Berkowitz, J. M., Ethington, C. T., & Miller, V. D. (1997). Testing two contrasting structural models of innovativeness in a contractual network. Human Communication Research, 24, 320-348.
34.
Keidel, R. W.
(1994). Rethinking organizational design. Academy of Management Executive, 8, 12-28.
35.
Knoke, D.
, & Burt, R. S. (1983). Prominence. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 195-222). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Koretz, G.
(1997, April 28). The downside of downsizing. Business Week, p. 26.
37.
Kozlowski, S. W.J.
, Chao, G. T., Smith, E., & Hedlund, J. (1993). Organizational downsizing: Strategies, interventions, and research implications. In C. L. Copper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 264-322). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
38.
Krackhardt, D.
(1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations, structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
Krackhardt, D. (1995). Groups, roles and Simmelian ties in organizations. Working paper, Heinz School of Public Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
40.
Krackhardt, D.
, & Porter, L. W. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242-261.
41.
Krackhardt, D.
, & Porter, L. W. (1986). The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 50-55.
42.
Levy, A.
, & Merry, U. (1986). Organizational transformation: Approaches, strategies, theories. New York: Praeger.
43.
Marsden, P. V.
(1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Psychology, 16, 435-463.
44.
McGuire, W. J.
(1983). A contextualist theory of knowledge: Its implications for innovation and reform in psychological research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.
45.
Miller, V. D.
, Johnson, J. R., & Grau, J. (1994). Antecedents of willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 59-80.
46.
Monge, P. R.
, & Contractor, N. S. (1987). Communication networks: Measurement techniques. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication (pp. 107-138). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47.
Monge, P. R.
, & Eisenberg, E. M. (1987). Emergent communication networks. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 304-342). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Rousseau, D. M.
(1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1-38.
49.
Salancik, G. R.
, & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253.
50.
Schwab, D. P.
(1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3-43.
51.
Sparrowe, R. T.
, & Liden, C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-552.
52.
Staw, B. M.
, & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Macro organizational psychology. In K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations (pp. 350-384). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53.
Tushman, M. L.
, & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171-222.
54.
Uchitelle, L.
, & Klienfield, N. R. (1996, March 3). On the battlefields of business, millions of casualties. The New York Times, pp. 1, 26-28.
55.
Whetten, D. A.
, & Cameron, K. S. (1994). Organizational-level productivity initiatives: The case of downsizing. In D. H. Harris (Ed.), Organizational linkages: Understanding the productivity paradox (pp. 262-290). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56.
Williams, L. J.
, & Podsakoff, P. M. (1989). Longitudinal field methods for studying reciprocal relationships in organizational behavior research: Toward improved causal analysis. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 247-292.
