This study investigated the effects of cognitive capacity and suspicion on veracity judgments. It was hypothesized that under low suspicion conditions, truth bias would be more pronounced when participants had low cognitive capacity than when participants had high cognitive capacity. One hundred and seven participants viewed presentations of people either truthfully or deceptively describing a series of pictures. Prior to the presentations, a short description designed to increase suspicion was read to half the participants. Participants viewed half of the presentations while working on arithmetic problems (low capacity) and the other half while not working on arithmetic problems (high capacity). Following each presentation, the participants were required to evaluate the communicator's performance on a number of scales and indicate whether the communicator was actually describing the picture. The results partially supported the hypothesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brandt, D. R.
, Hocking, J., & Miller, G. (1980). The truth-deception attribution: Effects of familiarity on the ability of observers to detect deception. Human Communication Research, 6, 99-110.
2.
Brandt, D. R.
, Miller, G., & Hocking, J. (1982). Familiarity and lie detection: A replication and extension. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 276-290.
3.
Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (in press). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory.
4.
Buller, D. B.
, Strzyzewski, K. D., & Comstock, J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Communication Monographs, 58, 1-24.
5.
Buller, D. B.
, Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. (1991). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58, 25-40.
6.
Burgoon, J.
, Buller, D., Ebesu, A., & Rockwell, P. (1994). Interpersonal deception: V. Accuracy in deception detection. Communication Monographs, 61, 303-325.
7.
Chaiken, S.
, Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
8.
Clark, H.
, & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
9.
DePaulo, B. M.
, Kirkendol, S., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.
10.
DePaulo, B. M.
, Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 323-370). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
DePaulo, P. J.
(1988). Research on deception in marketing communications: Its relevance to the study of nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 253-273.
12.
DePaulo, P. J.
, & DePaulo, B. M. (1989). Can deception by salespersons and customers be detected through nonverbal behavioral cues?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1552-1577.
13.
deTurck, M. A.
, & Harszlak, J., Bodhorn, D., & Texter, L. (1990). Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. Human Communication Research, 12, 181-201.
14.
Ekman, P.
(1985). Telling lies: Cues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
15.
Ekman, P.
, & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 46, 913-920.
16.
Festinger, L.
, & Maccoby, N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366.
17.
Fiedler, K.
, & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20, 199-223.
18.
Gilbert, D.
(1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Baught (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189-210). New York: Guilford.
19.
Gilbert, D.
(1993). The assent of man: Mental representation and control of belief. In D. Wegner & J. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 57-87). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Gilbert, D.
, Krull, D. S., & Malone, P. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 601-613.
21.
Gilbert, D.
, McNulty, S. E., Giuliano, T., & Benson, J. (1992). Blurry words and fuzzy deeds: The attribution of outcome behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 18-25.
22.
Greenwald, A. G.
(1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitude (pp. 148-170). New York: Academic Press.
23.
Grice, H. P.
(1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Seminar Press.
24.
Hilton, J.
, Fein, S., & Miller, D. (1993). Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 501-512.
25.
Kalbfleisch, P.
(1992). Deceit, distrust, and the social milieu: Application of deception research in a troubled world. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 308-334.
26.
Kirk, R. E.
(1986). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
27.
Kraut, R.
(1980). Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts. Journal of Communication, 30, 129-139.
28.
Kraut, R.
, & Higgins, E. (1984). Communication and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 88-127). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Langer, E.
, Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
30.
Levine, T. R.
, & McCornack, S. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 39, 325-339.
31.
McCornack, S. A.
, & Levine, T. (1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 219-230.
32.
McCornack, S. A.
, & Parks, M. R. (1986). Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 337-389). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Millar, M. G.
, & Millar, K. (1995). Detection of deception in familiar and unfamiliar persons: The effects of information restriction. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 69-83.
34.
Osterhouse, R. A.
, & Brock, T. C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 344-358.
35.
O'Sullivan, M.
, Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 203-215.
36.
Petty, R. E.
, Wells, G., & Brock, T. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
37.
Przybyla, D. P.
, & Byrne, D. (1984). The mediating role of cognitive processes in self-reported sexual arousal. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 54-63.
38.
Quattrone, G.
(1982). Overattribution and unit formation: When behavior engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 593-607.
39.
Riggio, R. E.
, Tucker, J., & Throckmorton, D. (1987). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568-577.
40.
Stiff, J.
, Kim, H., & Ramesh, C. (1992). Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19, 326-345.
41.
Stiff, J.
, & Miller, G., (1986). “Come to think of it...” Interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection. Human Communication Research, 12, 339-357.
42.
Toris, C.
, & DePaulo, B. M. (1985). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063-1073.
43.
Tversky, A.
, & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1130.
44.
Tversky, A.
, & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
45.
Vrij, A.
(1994). The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117-136.
46.
Wegner, D. M.
, Coulton, G. F., & Wenzlaff, R. (1985). The transparency of denial: Briefing in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 338-346.
47.
Winer, B. J.
(1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
48.
Wu, C.
, & Shaffer, D. R. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.
49.
Zuckerman, M.
, DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press.
50.
Zuckerman, M.
, & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
