This article evaluates the framing concept and its utility for communication research in conflict resolution. The framing concept holds potential heuristic value that has not been realized. The authors take three rehabilitative steps: (a) define frames as communicative, rather than cognitive, constructions, (b) provide a theoretical framework for explicating the communicative framing process and its potential impact in conflict, and (c) explore the effects of particular framing patterns on actual conflict interaction. The framing concept is enhanced through alignment with negotiated order theory, speech act theory, and speech accommodation theory. It is argued that disputants and the professionals who work with them “frame” issues, using language choices to highlight some aspects of an issue, while ignoring others. Linguistic choices function as verbal cues to other participants, who may respond by converging or diverging on frames. As expected, the results of the study found a positive relationship between frame convergence and frequency of agreements. Negotiators and mediators who guided disputant discussion toward frame convergence increased focus, control, positive social attributions, and integrativeness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bateson, G.
(1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
2.
Berger, P.
, & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
3.
Brown, P.
, & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56-288). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Burrell, N. A.
, Donohue, W. A., & Allen, M. (1990). The impact of disputants' expectations on mediation: Testing an interventionist model. Human Communication Research, 17, 104-139.
5.
Crow, B.
(1983). Topic shift in couples' conversations. In R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence (pp. 136-156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Day, R.
, & Day, J. V. (1977). A review of the current state of negotiated order theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 18, 126-142.
7.
Deutsch, M.
(1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Deutsch, M.
(1994). Constructive conflict management for the world today. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 111-129.
9.
Donohue, W. A.
(1991). Communication, marital dispute, and divorce mediation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Donohue, W. A.
, Allen, M., & Burrell, N. (1988). Mediator communicative competence. Communication Monographs, 55, 104-119.
11.
Donohue, W. A.
, Drake, L. E., & Roberto, A. J. (1994). Mediator issue intervention strategies: A replication and some conclusions. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 261-284.
12.
Donohue, W. A.
, Lyles, J., & Rogan, R. (1989). Issue development in divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 24, 19-28.
13.
Donohue, W. A.
, Ramesh, C., Kaufmann, G., & Smith, R. (1991). Crisis bargaining in intense conflict situations. International Journal of Group Tensions, 21, 133-145.
14.
Donohue, W. A.
, & Roberto, A. J. (1993). Relational development as negotiated order in hostage negotiation. Human Communication Research, 20, 175-198.
15.
Donohue, W. A.
, & Weider-Hatfield, D. (1988). Communication strategies in mediation. In J. Folberg & A. Milne (Eds.), Divorce mediation theory and practice (pp. 279-318). New York: Guilford.
16.
Evans, W. P.
, & Havercamp, M. J. (1994). An analysis of mediation assumptions: Strategies to help mediators in child custody disputes. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 229-245.
17.
Felstiner, W.L.F.
, Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review, 15, 631-654.
18.
Fisher, R.
, & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Folger, J. P.
, Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 4 (pp. 115-159). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20.
Folger, J. P.
, Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (1993). Working through conflict (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
21.
Fuselier, G. D.
(1981). A practical overview of hostage negotiations: Part 1. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 50, 2-6.
22.
Gallois, C.
(1988). Communication accommodation and the prototypical speaker: Predicting evaluations of status and solidarity. Language and Communication, 8, 271-283.
23.
Gaughan, L.
(1987). Divorce and family mediation. In D. Sandole & I. Sandole-Staroste (Eds.), Conflict management and problem solving: Interpersonal to international applications (pp. 107-118). New York University Press.
24.
Geist, P.
(1994, November). Negotiating who's order?: Communicating to negotiate identities and revise organizational structures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
25.
Geist, P.
, & Hardesty, M. (1992). Negotiating the crisis: DRGs and the transformation of hospitals. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Giles, H.
, Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 13-40). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Goffman, E.
(1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Goffman, E.
(1982). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1-17.
29.
Gray, B.
(1991, June). The framing of disputes: Patterns, processes, and outcomes in different contexts. Paper presented to the annual conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
30.
Gray, B., & Donnellon, A. (1989). An interactive theory of reframing in negotiation. Unpublished manuscript. Pennsylvania State University, College of Business Administration, University Park, PA.
31.
Grebe, S. C.
(1988). Structured mediation and its variants: What makes it unique. In J. Folberg & A. Milne (Eds.), Divorce mediation: Theory and practice (pp. 225-248). New York: Guilford.
32.
Green, J. O.
, Smith, S. W., & Lindsey, A. E. (1990). Memory representations of compliance-gaining strategies and tactics. Human Communication Research, 17, 195-231.
33.
Guetzkow, H.
(1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.
34.
Hammer, M. R.
, Rogan, R. G., VanZandt, C. R., & Laffon, A. (1993, November). Communication dynamics in a crisis situation: Negotiating the Talladega Prison takeover. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
35.
Heimer, C.
(1985). Allocating information costs in a negotiated information order: Interorganizational constraints on decision-making in Norwegian oil insurance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 395-417.
36.
Hocker, J. L.
, & Wilmot, W. W. (1991). Interpersonal conflict (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
37.
Holmes, M. E.
(1993). WINPHASER: Flexible phase mapping for interaction analysis data [Computer program]. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Department of Communication.
38.
Holmes, M. E.
, & Sykes, R. E. (1991, October). A comparison of phase structures of authentic and simulated hostage negotiations. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Michigan Association of Speech Communication, Ypsilanti, MI.
39.
Johnstone, B.
(1989). Linguistic strategies and cultural styles for persuasive discourse. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny (Eds.), Language, communication, and culture (pp. 139-156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Jones, T. S.
(1989). A taxonomy of effective mediator strategies and tactics for nonlabor-management mediation. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 221-229). New York: Praeger.
41.
Kahneman, D.
(1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296-312.
42.
Kent, G. G.
, Davis, J. D., & Shapiro, D. (1981). Effect of mutual acquaintance on the construction of conversation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 197-209.
43.
Kressel, K.
, & Pruitt, D. (1989). Conclusion: A research perspective on the mediation of social conflict. In K. Kressel and D. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 394-435). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44.
Lax, D. A.
, & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The power of alternatives or the limits of negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 1, 163-179.
45.
Lewicki, R. J.
, & Litterer, J. A. (1985). Negotiation. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
46.
Littlejohn, S. W.
, & Shailor, J. (1986, November). The deep structure of conflict in mediation: A case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
47.
Millen, J. H.
(1992). The social construction of blame: A mediation case study. Human Systems, 2, 199-216.
48.
Millen, J. H.
(1994). A communication perspective for mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 275-284.
49.
Miron, M. S.
, & Goldstein, A. P. (1979). Hostage. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
50.
Moore, C. W.
(1986). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51.
Morgan, T. C.
(1990). Issue linkages in international crisis bargaining. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 311-333.
52.
Nathan, M. L.
, & Mitroff, I. I. (1991). The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development of an interorganizational field. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 163-180.
53.
Neale, M. A.
, & Bazerman, M. H. (1985). The effects of framing and negotiator overconfidence on bargainer behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 34-49.
54.
Neale, M. A.
, Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Context versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 228-241.
55.
Nierenberg, G. I.
, & Calero, H. H. (1974). Meta-talk: The art of deciphering everyday conversation. In R. J. Lewicki, J. A. Litterer, D. A. Saunders, & J. W. Minton (Eds.), Negotiation (pp. 245-251). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
56.
Northrup, T.
(1989). The dynamic of identity in personal and social conflict. In L. Kriesberg, T. Northrup, & S. Throson, (Eds.), Intractable conflicts and their transformation (pp. 55-82). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
57.
Pearson, J.
, & Thoennes, N. (1989). Divorce mediation: Reflections on a decade of research. In K. Kressel & D. G. Pruitt and Associates (Eds.), Mediation research: The process and effectiveness of third party intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58.
Pillar, P. R.
(1983). Negotiating peace: War termination as a bargaining process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
Pinkley, R. L.
(1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117-126.
60.
Pruitt, D. G.
(1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
61.
Pruitt, D. G.
, & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
62.
Putnam, L. L.
(1990). Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: A process perspective. In B. H. Sheppard, M. H. Bazerman, & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (vol. 2, pp. 3-30). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
63.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Holmer, M. (1992). Framing, reframing, and issue development. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 128-155). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Jones, T. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 277-297.
65.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Wilson, S. R. (1989). Argumentation and bargaining strategies as discriminators of integrative outcomes. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 121-141). New York: Praeger.
66.
Putnam, L. L.
, Wilson, S. R., Waltman, M. S., & Turner, D. (1986). The evolution of case arguments in teachers' bargaining. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 23, 63-81.
67.
Rubin, J. Z.
, & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
68.
Rule, B. G.
, Bisanz, G. L., & Kohn, M. (1985). Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals, and strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1127-1140.
69.
Savage, G. T.
, Blair, J. D., & Sorenson, R. L. (1989). Consider both relationships and substance when negotiating strategically. In R. J. Lewicki, J. A. Litterer, D. A. Saunders, & J. W. Minton (Eds.), Negotiation (pp. 253-70). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
70.
Searle, J.
(1965). What is a speech act? In M. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America (pp. 221-239). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
71.
Strauss, A.
(1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72.
Streeck, J.
(1980). Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle. Discourse Processes, 3, 133-154.
73.
Touval, S.
, & Zartman, I. W. (1989). Mediation in international conflicts. In K. Kressel & D. G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 115-137). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
Tutzauer, F.
, & Roloff, M. E. (1988). Communication processes leading to integrative agreements: Three paths to joint benefits. Communication Research, 15, 360-380.
75.
Tversky, A.
, & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 221, 453-458.
76.
Wall, J. A.
(1985). Negotiation theory and practice. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
77.
Watzlawick, P.
, Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
78.
Wehr, P.
(1979). Conflict regulation. Boulder, CO: Westview.
79.
Weiner, M.
, & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
80.
Winter, D. G.
(1993). Power, affiliation, and war: Three tests of a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 532-545.
