This article attempts to stabilize the concept of communicative meaning, responding to theorists who maintain that meaning has lost its moorings, that historical and linguistic forces disturb the idea of meaning so thoroughly it is impossible to achieve. In the first section, I argue that the assumption of semantic realism is necessary to any intellectual or disciplinary concept of communication. This section also distinguishes between meaning and significance: Meaning is a purposeful and constrained sharable message, and significance is the relationship of the message to other realms of importance. The second section outlines a coherentist epistemology for meaning by addressing issues in intelligibility, order, and verification. The final section contrasts a message perspective with a code perspective and explains how a theory of communication, not language, can use various considerations pragmatically (e.g., referential rules, intentionality, context) to bound meaning and keep it from slipping into incessant semiosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almeder, R.
(Ed.). (1982). Praxis and reason. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
2.
Ang, I.
(1993). Dallas and the ideology of mass culture. In S. During (Ed.), The critical studies reader (pp. 403-420). London: Routledge.
3.
Barthes, R.
(1975). The pleasure of the text (R. Miller, Trans.). New York: Hill & Wang.
4.
Beniger, J. R.
(1993). Communication—embrace the subject, not the field. Journal of Communication, 43, 18-25.
5.
Benveniste, E.
(1971). Problems in general linguistics. Florida: University of Miami Press.
6.
Bochner, A. P.
(1985). Perspectives on inquiry: Representation, conversation, and reflection. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 27-58). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Cappella, J.
(1979). The functional prerequisites of intentional communication systems. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 5, 231-247.
8.
Carbaugh, D.
(Ed.). (1990). Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Caton, C. E.
(Ed.). (1970). Philosophy and ordinary language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10.
Chang, B. G.
(1992). Empty intention. Text and Performance Quarterly, 12, 212-227.
11.
Cheney, G.
, & Tompkins, P. K. (1988). On the facts of the text as the basis of human communication research. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 455-481). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Davis, W. H.
(1972). Peirce's epistemology. Netherlands, The Hague: Mouton.
13.
Deetz, S.
(1973). Words without things: Toward a social phenomenology of language. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 40-51.
14.
Deetz, S.
(1982). Critical-interpretive research in organizational communication. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 131-149.
15.
Derrida, J.
(1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Derrida, J.
(1981). Dissemination (B. Johnson, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Eco, U.
(1979). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
Eco, U.
(1994). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
19.
Ellis, D. G.
(1992). Syntactic and pragmatic codes in communication. Communication Theory, 2, 1-23.
20.
Ferrara, A.
(1985). Pragmatics. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol 2., pp. 137-157). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
21.
Foucault, M.
(1984). The Foucault reader (P. Rabinow, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
22.
Gadamer, H. G.
(1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Crossroad.
23.
Gergen, K. J.
(1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-273.
24.
Giddens, A.
(1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Giddens, A.
(1987). Structuralism, post-structuralism, and the production of culture. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 195-223). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
Grossberg, L.
(1993). Can cultural studies find true happiness in communication?Journal of Communication, 43, 89-97.
27.
Habermas J.
(1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. II. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
28.
Hanna, J. F.
(1991). Critical theory and the politicization of science. Communication Monographs, 58, 202-212.
29.
Heidegger, M.
(1967). Being and time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
30.
Heidegger, M.
(1985). History of the concept of time (T. Kisiel, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31.
Heritage, J.
(1984). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Heritage, J.
(1990/1991). Intention, meaning, and strategy: Observations on constraints on interaction analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 311-332.
33.
Hirsch, E. D.
(1967). Validity in interpretation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Hurwitz, W. L.
(1993). Semiotics and communication: Signs, codes, cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Kellermann, K.
(1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59, 288-300.
36.
Kellner, D.
(1990). Television and the crisis of democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
37.
Klein, J. T.
(1990). Across the boundaries. Social Epistemology, 4, 267-280.
38.
Kristeva, J.
(1986). The Kristeva reader (Toril Moi, Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
39.
Langer, E.
(1992). Interpersonal mindlessness and language. Communication Monographs, 59, 324-327.
40.
Lannamann, J. W.
(1991). Interpersonal communication research and ideological practice. Communication Theory, 1, 179-203.
41.
Moerman, M.
(1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42.
Nehamas, A.
(1987). Writer, text, work, author. In A. Cascardi (Ed.), Literature and the question of philosophy, (pp. 135-163). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43.
Peirce, C. S.
(1955). The philosophy of Peirce: Selected writings. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1877)
44.
Peters, J. D.
(1994). The gaps of which communication is made. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11, 117-140.
45.
Philipsen, G.
(1986). Mayor Daley's council speech: A cultural analysis. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, 247-260.
46.
Railsback, C. C.
(1983). Beyond rhetorical relativism: A structural-material model of truth and objective reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 351-363.
47.
Rescher, N.
(1973). The coherence theory of truth. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
48.
Rescher, N.
(1979). Cognitive systematization. Totowa, Canada: Rowman & Littlefield.
49.
Rescher, N.
(1987). Scientific realism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
50.
Rorty, R.
(1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
51.
Rorty, R.
(1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Said, E. W.
(1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
Schutz, A.
, & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the lifeworld. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
54.
Searle, J.
(1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Searle, J. R.
(1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts, 59-82. New York: Academic Press.
56.
Searle, J.
(1979a). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. London: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Searle, J.
(1979b). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92-124). London: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Searle, J.
(1983). Intentionality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Shah, H.
, & Thornton, M. C. (1994). Racial ideology in U.S. mainstream news magazine coverage of Black-Latino interaction, 1980-1992. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11, 141-161.
60.
Sholle, D.
(1995). Resisting discipline: Repositioning media studies in the university. Communication Theory, 5, 130-143.
61.
Shotter, J.
, & Gergen, K. J. (1994). Social construction: Knowledge, self, others, and continuing the conversation. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 17, pp. 3-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Stamp, G. H.
, & Knapp, M. L. (1990). The construct of intent in interpersonal communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 76, 282-299.
63.
Stewart, J.
(1986). Speech and human beings: A complement to semiotics. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, 55-73.
64.
Stewart, J.
(1993). Beyond the symbol model: Notes toward a post-semiotic account of the nature of language. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, Washington, DC.
65.
Streeter, T.
(1995). Introduction: For and against the discipline of communication. Communication Theory, 5, 117-129.
66.
van Dijk, T. A.
(1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.
67.
van Dijk, T. A.
, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
68.
Williams, R.
(1993). Advertising: The magic system. In S. During (Ed.), The critical studies reader (pp. 332-336). London: Routledge.
69.
Wimsatt, W. K.
, & Beardsley, M. C. (1976). The intentional fallacy. In D. Newton-DeMolina (Ed.), On literary intention (pp. 1-13). Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
70.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1963). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
