Despite the popularity of issue / advocacy advertising campaigns, there has been limited empirical study of their overall impact. This investigation posits that issue / advocacy advertising should be viewed as a vehicle for inoculating against attitude slippage and for enhancing the sponsor's credibility among people who already favor a corporation's position, rather than as a tool to change attitudes. An experimental test of attitudinal and image effects of issue / advocacy advertising confirmed this theoretical view. The results indicated that issue / advocacy advertising inoculates against attitude change, while simultaneously protecting sponsors against slippage in ratings of source credibility, after exposure to a persuasive attack on behalf of an opposing position. These results are discussed in terms of their theoretical and policy implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adkins, L.
(1978, June). How good are advocacy ads?Dun's Review, pp. 76-77.
2.
Aghazarian, A. A.
, Berg, J., & Simons, H. W. (1982, November). Paradoxical message format: Mobil's TV issue advocacy campaign. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Louisville, KY.
3.
Anderson, L. R.
, & McGuire, W. J. (1965). Prior reassurance of group consensus as a factor in producing resistance to persuasion. Sociometry, 28, 44-56.
4.
Astor, G.
(1976, April). The gospel according to Mobil. More, pp. 12-15.
5.
Becker, S. W.
, Bavelas, A., & Braden, M. (1961). An index to measure contingency of English sentences. Language and Speech, 4, 138-145.
6.
Burgoon, M.
, et al. (1976). Propensity of persuasive attack and intensity of pretreatment messages as predictors of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Psychology, 92, 123-129.
7.
Burgoon, M.
, Burgoon, J. K., & Wilkinson, M. (1981). Newspaper image and evaluation. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 411-419, 433.
8.
Burgoon, M.
, & Chase, L. J. (1973). The effects of differential linguistic patterns in messages attempting to induce resistance to persuasion. Speech Monographs, 40, 1-7.
9.
Burgoon, M.
, Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 27-39.
10.
Burgoon, M.
, & King, L. B. (1974). The mediation of resistance to persuasion strategies by language variables and active-passive participation. Human Communication Research, 1, 30-41.
11.
Coe, B. J.
(1983). The effectiveness challenge in issue advertising campaigns. Journal of Advertising, 12, 27-35.
12.
Connor, M. J.
(1975, May 14). Arguing back: Mobil's advocacy ads lead a growing trend, draw praise and criticism. The Wall Street Journal, pp. 1 & 20.
13.
Crable, R. E.
, & Vibbert, S. L. (1982, November). “Observations” of Prometheusbound: Issues, identification, and the appeal to common sense. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Louisville, KY.
14.
Dardenne, P.
(1981, November). The cost of corporate advertising. Public Relations Journal, pp. 30-35.
15.
Dean, R. B.
, Austin, J. A., & Watts, W. A. (1971). Forewarning effects in persuasion: Field and classroom experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 210-221.
16.
Fox, K. F. A.
(1986). The measurement of issue/advocacy advertising effects. In J. H. Leigh & C. R. Martin, Jr. (Eds.), Current issues & research in advertising (pp. 61-92). Ann Arbor: Division of Research, University of Michigan Business School.
17.
Freedman, J. L.
, & Steinbruner, J. D. (1964). Perceived choice and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 678-681.
18.
Gardner, M.
, Mitchell, A., & Staelin, R. (1977). The effects of attacks and inoculations in a public policy context. In B. A. Greenberg & D. N. Bellenger (Eds.), Contemporary marketing thought: 1977 educators' proceedings (pp. 292-297). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
19.
Hardy, K. G.
(1982). Time to be heard on advocacy advertising. The Canadian Business Review, 9, 35-39.
20.
Hass, R. G.
, & Linder, D. E. (1972). Counterargument availability and the effects of message structure on persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 219-233.
21.
Hunt, H. K.
(1973). Effects of corrective advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 13, 15-24.
22.
Infante, D. A.
(1975). Effects of opinionated language on communicator image and in conferring resistance to persuasion. Western Speech Communication, 39, 112-119.
23.
Kamins, M. A.
, & Asseal, H. (1987). Two-sided versus one-sided appeals: A cognitive perspective on argumentation, source derogation, and the effect of disconfirming trial on belief change. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 29-39.
24.
Keim, G.
, & Zeithaml, V. (1981). Improving the return on advocacy advertising. Financial Executive, 49, 40-44.
25.
Keppel, G.
(1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Mazis, M. B. (1976). A theoretical and empirical examination of comparative advertising. College of Business Administration Working Paper, University of Florida.
27.
McCroskey, J. C.
, Jensen, T., Todd, C., & Toomb, J. K. (1972, November). Measurement of the credibility of organizational sources. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, Honolulu, HA.
28.
McCroskey, J. C.
, Young, T. J., & Scott, M. D. (1972). The effects of message sidedness and evidence on inoculation against counterpersuasion in small group communication [Special reports]. Speech Monographs, 34, 205-212.
29.
McGuire, W. J.
(1961a). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184-197.
30.
McGuire, W. J.
(1961b). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326-332.
31.
McGuire, W. J.
(1962). Persistence of the resistance to persuasion induced by various types of prior belief defenses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 241-248.
32.
McGuire, W. J.
(1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.
33.
McGuire, W. J.
, & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327-337.
34.
McGuire, W. J.
, & Papageorgis, D. (1962). Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24-34.
35.
Miller, G. R.
, & Burgoon, M. (1973). New techniques of persuasion. New York: Harper & Row.
36.
Miller, M. D.
, & Burgoon, M. (1979). The relationship between violations of expectations and the induction of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 301-313.
37.
Papageorgis, D.
, & McGuire, W. J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 475-481.
38.
Pfau, M. (1987). Inoculation in political campaign communication (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48 (9A), 2195.
39.
Pfau, M.
(1992). The potential of inoculation in promoting resistance to the effectiveness of comparative advertising messages. Communication Quarterly, 40, 26-44.
40.
Pfau, M.
, & Burgoon, M. (1988). Inoculation in political campaign communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 91-111.
41.
Pfau, M.
, & Burgoon, M. (1989). The efficacy of issue and character attack message strategies in political campaign communication. Communication Reports, 2, 53-61.
42.
Pfau, M.
, & Burgoon, M. (1990). Inoculation in political campaigns and gender. Women's Studies in Communication, 13, 1-22.
43.
Pfau, M.
, & Kenski, H. C. (1990). Attack politics: Strategy and defense. New York: Praeger.
44.
Pfau, M.
, Kenski, H. C., Nitz, M., & Sorenson, J. (1990). Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Application to direct mail. Communication Monographs, 57, 25-43.
45.
Reid, L. N.
, Soley, L. C., & Vanden Bergh, B. G. (1981). Does source affect response to direct advocacy print advertisements?Journal of Business Research, 9, 309-319.
46.
Ross, I.
(1976, September). Public relations isn't kid-glove stuff at Mobil. Fortune, pp. 106-111, 196-199, 201-202.
47.
Sethi, S. P.
(1977). Advocacy advertising and large corporations. Lexington: Lexington Books.
48.
Sethi, S. P.
(1979). Institutional/image advertising and idea/issue advertising as marketing tools: Some public policy issues. Journal of Marketing, 43, 68-78.
49.
Stone, V. A.
(1969). Individual differences and inoculation against persuasion. Journalism Quarterly, 46, 267-273.
50.
Tannenbaum, P. H.
, Macaulay, J. R., & Norris, E. L. (1966). Principle of congruity and reduction of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 233-238.
51.
Tannenbaum, P. H.
, & Norris, E. L. (1965). Effects of combining congruity principle strategies for the reduction of persuasion. Sociometry, 28, 145-157.
52.
Ullman, W. R.
, & Bodaken, E. M. (1975). Inducing resistance to persuasive attack: A test of two strategies of communication. Western Speech Communication, 39, 240-248.
53.
Woolward, I.
(1982a). How to make corporate advocacy ads more effective. Marketing Communications, 17, 60.
54.
Woolward, I.
(1982b). Rethinking corporate advocacy media strategy. Industrial Marketing, 67, 74-78.
