This study examined the role of the norm of reciprocity in mediating the relative effect of compliance-gaining message type on compliance in interactions involving friends and strangers. Subjects received either a direct request to purchase raffle tickets or received the request after having a favor done for them by a confederate, a pregiving message. Results indicate that friends comply more with requests than strangers and that their compliance is constant across message types. Among strangers, the pregiving message produced more compliance than the direct request.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyle, M.
, & Henderson, M. (1984). The rules of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 211-237.
2.
Clark, M. S.
(1981). Noncomparability of benefits given and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 41, 375-381.
3.
Clark, M. S.
(1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549-557.
4.
Clark, M. S.
, & Mills, J. R. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
5.
Clark, M. S.
, Mills, J. R., & Corcoran, D. M. (1989). Keeping track of needs in communal and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 533-542.
6.
Clark, M. S.
, Mills, J. R., & Powell, M. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 333-338.
7.
Gouldner, A. W.
(1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
8.
Hunter, J. E.
, & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis and causal models. In B. M. Straw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 267-320). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
Keppel, G.
(1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Marwell, G.
, & Schmitt, D. R. (1967). Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30, 350-364.
11.
Miller, G. R.
, Boster, F. J., Roloff, M. E., & Seibold, D. R. (1977). Compliancegaining message strategies: A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences. Communication Monographs, 44, 37-51.
12.
Mills, J. R.
, & Clark, M. S. (1982). Communal and exchange relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Annual review of personality and social psychology (pp. 121-144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Regan, D. T.
(1971). Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 627-639.
14.
Roloff, M. E.
(1987). Communication and reciprocity within intimate relationships. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 11-38). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Roloff, M. E.
, Janiszewski, C. A., McGrath, M. A., Burns, C. S., & Manrai, L. A. (1988). Acquiring resources from intimates: When obligation substitutes for persuasion. Human Communication Research, 14, 364-369.
16.
Rosenthal, R.
, & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
