This study examined the effects of time restriction on social interaction in computer-mediated communication through a meta-analysis of applicable research. Time was defined as whether subjects were restricted or unrestricted in their opportunity to exchange messages. Studies were included that assessed either of two outcome variables: socially oriented (as opposed to task-oriented) communication, and negative / uninhibited communication. Hypotheses were derived from Walther's social information processing perspective. Meta-analytic tests supported the hypotheses on social communication. Although no effects were found on negative / uninhibited communication, a reexamination of original studies suggests caution regarding previous findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adkins, M.
(1992, May). The power of language in computer-mediated groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Miami.
2.
Allen, T. B.
(1988, September). Bulletin boards of the 21st century are coming of age. Smithsonian, pp. 83-93.
3.
Asteroff, J. F. (1987). Paralanguage in electronic mail: A case study. Unpublished dissertation, Columbia University.
4.
Baldwin, C.
, & Holmes, M. E. (1992, May). Social presence and verbal immediacy: A linguistic critique of media determinism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Miami.
5.
Bales, R. F.
(1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257-263.
6.
Bales, R. F.
(1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
7.
Beals, D. E.
(1991, April). Computer-mediated communication among beginning teachers. T.H.E. Journal, pp. 74-77.
8.
Burgoon, J. K.
, & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54, 19-41.
9.
Carey, J.
(1980). Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. In N. K. Sondheimer (Ed.), The 18th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and parasession on topics in interactive discourse: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 67-69). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
10.
Chesebro, J. W.
(1985). Computer-mediated interpersonal communication. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 202-222). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
11.
Cohen, J.
(1987). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Connolly, T.
, Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 97-120.
13.
Culnan, M. J.
, & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Diener, E.
(1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In P. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (1st ed., pp. 202-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Dubrovsky, V. J.
, Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
16.
Feldman, M. S.
(1987). Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Office: Technology and People, 3, 83-101.
17.
Finholt, T.
, Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1990). Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 291-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Fisher, B. A.
(1974). Small group decision making: Communication and the group process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Foulger, D. A. (1990). Medium as process: The structure, use, and practice of computer conferencing on IBM's IBMPC computer conferencing facility. Unpublished dissertation, Temple University.
20.
Fulk, J.
, Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Hale, J. L.
, & Dillard, J. P. (1991). The uses of meta-analysis: Making knowledge claims and setting research agendas. Communication Monographs, 58, 463-471.
22.
Haythorn, W.
(1953). The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 276-284.
23.
Hellerstein, L. N.
(1985). The social use of electronic communication at a major university. Computers and the Social Sciences, 1, 191-197.
24.
Hesse, B. W.
, Werner, C. M., & Altman, I. (1988). Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 147-165.
25.
Hiemstra, G.
(1982). Teleconferencing, concern for face, and organizational culture. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 874-904). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
Hiltz, S. R.
(1975). Communications and group decision-making: Experimental evidence on the potential impact of computer conferencing (Research Rep. No. 2). Newark, NJ: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Computerized Conferencing and Communications Center.
27.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Johnson, K., & Agle, G. (1978). Replicating Bales's problem solving experiments on a computerized conference: A pilot study (Research Rep. No. 8). Newark, NJ: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Computerized Conferencing and Communications Center.
28.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
29.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1989). Experiments in group decision making, 3: Disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences. Decision Support Systems, 5, 217-232.
30.
Hirokawa, R. Y.
(1988). Group communication research: Considerations for the use of interaction analysis. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communication processes (pp. 229-245). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
31.
Holmes, M. E.
, & Berquist, C. (1990, November). Gender display in synchronous computer-mediated discourse: A case of channel constraints and opportunities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago.
32.
Johansen, R.
, DeGrasse, R., & Wilson, T. (1978). Group communication through computers, Volume 5: Effects on working patterns. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future.
33.
Johansen, R.
, Vallee, J., & Spangler, K. (1988). Teleconferencing: Electronic group communication. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samover (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (5th ed., pp. 140-154). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
34.
Kerr, E. B.
, & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer-mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.
35.
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
36.
Kiesler, S.
, Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
37.
Kraemer, K. L.
, & Pinsonneault, A. (1990). Technology and groups: An assessment of the empirical research. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 375-405). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Lea, M.
(1991). Rationalist assumptions in cross-media comparisons of computer-mediated communication. Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 153-172.
39.
Lea, M.
, O'Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. (1992). “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 89-112). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
40.
Lea, M.
, & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2, 321-341.
41.
Markus, M. L. (in press). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science.
42.
Matheson, K.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communication. Social Behaviour, 4, 99-111.
43.
Matheson, K.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Computer-mediated communications: The focus is on me. Social Science Computer Review [Computing: Social and policy issues], 8, 1-12.
44.
McCormick, N. B.
, & McCormick, J. W. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 379-405.
45.
McGrath, J. E.
(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46.
McGrath, J. E.
(1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technical foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
McGrath, J. E.
(1993). Introduction: The JEMCO workshop—description of a longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 24, 285-306.
48.
McGuire, T.
, Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
49.
McLeod, P. L.
(1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 257-280.
50.
McLeod, P. L.
, & Liker, J. K. (1992). Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment. Information Systems Research, 3, 195-223.
51.
Ord, J. G.
(1989). Who's joking? The information system at play. Interacting With Computers, 1, 118-128.
52.
Phillips, S. R.
, & Eisenberg, E. M. (1989, May). The persuasive use of electronic mail in organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
53.
Rafaeli, S.
(1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Rice, R. E.
(1984). Mediated group communication. In R. E. Rice & Associates (Eds.), The new media: Communication, research, and technology (pp. 129-156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55.
Rice, R. E.
(1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451-484.
56.
Rice, R. E.
, & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
57.
Rice, R.
, & Shook, D. (1990). Relationships of job catergories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 27, 195-229.
58.
Rosenthal, R.
(1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
Rosenthal, R.
, & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
Santoro, G. M.
(1990). Computer support and simulation for the study of small groups. In G. M. Phillips (Ed.), Teaching how to work in groups (pp. 130-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
61.
Selfe, C. L.
, & Meyer, P. R. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8, 163-192.
62.
Sherblom, J.
(1988). Direction, function, and signature in electronic mail. Journal of Business Communication, 25, 39-54.
63.
Short, J.
, Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: John Wiley.
64.
Siegel, J.
, Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
65.
Siegel, S.
, & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
66.
Smith, J. Y.
, & Vanecek, M. T. (1990). Dispersed group decision making using nonsimultaneous computer conferencing: A report of research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 71-92.
67.
Smolensky, M. W.
, Carmody, M. A., & Halcomb, C. G. (1990). The influence of task type, group structure and extraversions on uninhibited speech in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 261-272.
68.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
69.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1991, September). Computers, networks, and work. Scientific American, pp. 84-91.
70.
Sproull, L.
, & Kiesler, S. (1992, February 3). Don't forget Dr. Frankenstein. Computerworld, p. 25.
71.
Steinfield, C.
(1992). Computer-mediated communications in organizational settings: Emerging conceptual frameworks and directions for research. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 348-365.
72.
Steinfield, C. W.
(1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 777-804). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
73.
Thompsen, P. A.
, & Ahn, D. (1992, Summer). To be or not to be: An exploration of E-prime, copula deletion and flaming in electronic mail. Et Cetera: A Review of General Semantics, 49, 146-164.
74.
Walther, J. B.
(1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
75.
Walther, J. B.
(1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
76.
Walther, J. B.
(1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
77.
Walther, J. B.
(in press-b). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science.
78.
Walther, J. B.
, & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
79.
Weedman, J.
(1991). Task and non-task functions of a computer conference used in professional education: A measure of flexibility. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 303-318.
80.
Weisband, S. P. (1989). Discussion, advocacy, and computer-mediated communication effects in group decision making. Unpublished dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.
81.
Weisband, S. P.
(1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
82.
Wheeler, L.
(1966). Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychological Review, 73, 179-192.
83.
Williams, F.
, & Rice, R. E. (1983). Communication research and new media technologies. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 7 (pp. 200-224). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
84.
Williams, F.
, Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press.
85.
Yates, J.
, & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: An approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
