U.S. news organizations, both print and broadcast, are moving from practices in which “professional” journalists define what is newsworthy toward letting the market decide. The trend has generated much debate, but little from a theoretical perspective. This article seeks to provide some conceptual tools for thinking about how news will fare as a market-driven product. The analysis concludes that those who argue that market forces will improve journalism have not carefully examined the nature of news with market theory—microeconomics. In fact, microeconomic theory suggests that commodities like news are likely to engender opportunism on the part of news organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, E.
(1984). Hutchins revisited: Thirty-five years of social responsiblity theory. In R. Schmuhl (Ed.), The responsibilities of journalism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
2.
Altschull, J. H.
(1984). Agents of power. New York: Longman.
3.
Bagdikian, B. H.
(1987). The media monopoly (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon.
4.
Bagdikian, B. H.
(1989, May). Power, profits and the press. Paper presented at Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA.
5.
Bagdikian, B. H.
(1990). The media monopoly (3rd ed.). Boston: Beacon.
6.
Barney, R. D.
(1987). Responsibilities of the journalist: An ethical construct. Mass Communication Review, 4, 3-15.
7.
Barnouw, E.
(1990). Tube of plenty. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Bogart, L.
(1991). The American media system and its commercial culture (Occasional Paper No. 8). New York: Gannett Foundation Media Center.
9.
Boorstin, D.
(1961). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Atheneum.
10.
Brennan, T. J.
(1991, August). Economic perspectives on the First Amendment. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Mass Communication, Boston.
11.
Cohen, S. E.
(1989, July/August). While S&Ls were robbed, the press watch-dogs slept. The Quill, pp. 21-23.
12.
Darby, M. R.
, & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67-88.
13.
Day, L. A.
(1991). Ethics in media communications: Cases and controversies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14.
Dozier, D. M.
, & Hofstetter, C. R. (1985, May). Useful news, sensational views: Some sensational observations about local television news. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Political Communication Division of the International Communication Association, Honolulu.
15.
Entman, R. M.
, & Wildman, S. (1991, August). Toward a new analytical framework for media policy: Reconciling economic and non-economic perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston.
16.
Gale Research.
(1990). Gale Directory of Publications and Broadcast Media (122nd ed.). Detroit, MI: Author.
17.
Harmon, M. D.
(1989). Market size and local television news judgment. Journal of Media Economics, 2, 15-29.
18.
Henry, W. A., III.
(1981). News as entertainment: The search for dramatic unity. In E. Abel (Ed.), What's news: The media in American society. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
19.
Herman, E.
, & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon.
20.
Hutchins, R. M.
, & the Commission on Freedom of the Press. (1947). A free and responsible press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Issacs, N.
(1986). Untended gates: The mismanaged press. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Kahneman, D.
, & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
23.
Kerner, O.
(1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24.
Kurtz, H.
(1991, January 6). Slicing, dicing news to attract the young; Florida paper aims to buck trend of declining national readership. Washington Post, p. A1.
25.
Lacy, S.
, & Dalmia, S. (1991, August). Michigan newspaper competition from 1980 to 1986: Expanding the geographic application of the umbrella model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston.
26.
Lambeth, E. B.
(1991, June). Gene Roberts: A case for leadership. The Quill, pp. 14-24.
27.
Lang, K.
, & Lang, G. E. (1968). Politics and television. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
28.
Lee, M. A.
, & Solomon, N. (1991). Unreliable sources. New York: Carol Communications.
29.
Lesly, E.
(1991). Realtors and builders demand happy news—and often get it. Washington Journalism Review, 13(8), 20-23.
30.
Main, R. S.
, & Baird, C. W. (1981). Elements of microeconomics (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
31.
March, J. G.
, & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
32.
Massing, M.
(1991). Is the most popular evening newscast the best?Columbia Journalism Review, 29(6), 30-35.
33.
McManus, J. H. (1988a). Economic and technological influences on the quality of local television news. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
34.
McManus, J. H.
(1988b, July). An economic theory of news selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
35.
McManus, J. H.
(1991). How objective is local television news. Mass Communication Review, 18(3), 21-30.
36.
Mencher, M.
(1987). News reporting and writing (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown.
37.
Mott, F. L.
(1962). American journalism (2nd ed.). Toronto: Macmillan.
38.
Picard, R. G.
(1989). Media economics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Powers, R.
(1977). Eyewitless news. Columbia Journalism Review, 16(1), 17-23.
40.
Robinson, J. P.
, & Davis, D. K. (1989). Informing the public: Is TV news the main source? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
41.
Rosse, J. N.
(1978). An economist's description of the media industry. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Media Concentration (Vol. 1, pp. 40-192). Washington, DC: Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission.
42.
Rotzoll, K. B.
, Haefner, J. E., & Sandage, C. H. (1990). Advertising in contemporary society (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern.
43.
Scott, W. R.
(1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Singer, S.
(1991). Auto dealers muscle the newsroom. Washington Journalism Review, 13(7), 24-28.
45.
Smith, A.
(1909). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: P. Collier. (Original work published 1776)
46.
Statistical abstract of the United States. (1990). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47.
Stepp, C. S.
(1991). When readers design the news. Washington Journalism Review, 3(3), 20-24.
48.
Stone, V. A.
(1991, March). Staff gains offset cutbacks. The Communicator, pp. 24-25.
49.
Turow, J.
(1984). Media industries. New York: Longman.
50.
Udell, J. G.
(1978). The economics of the American newspaper. New York: Hastings House.
51.
Underwood, D.
(1988). When MBAs rule the newsroom. Columbia Journalism Review, 26(6), 23-30.
52.
Williams, W. S.
(1991). New surveys show the industry's reach. Washington Journalism Review, 13(8), 4-27.
53.
Williamson, O. E.
(1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233-261.
54.
Williamson, O. E.
(1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.
55.
Zachary, G. P.
(1992, February 26). Many journalists see a growing reluctance to criticize advertisers. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
