The question some ask about the Hollywood buyouts by major foreign interests is whether ownership changes alter the principal questions posed by the cultural imperialism tradition. From a critical perspective, the answer is no, because the set of underlying problems still remains. This article traces some of the history of the term from its Latin American origins in the 1970s to Europe in the 1980s. A look at more recent writings on the issues of cultural hegemony shows how, although the terms of the debate have changed some what, significant current issues, such as market dominance, cultural practice, and audience reception, remain to be fully explored. A review of the sale of Hollywood assets from the mid-1980s does not suggest fundamental changes in the process of cultural production or distribution. Many areas for critical research remain to be addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, G.
(1991, February 3). Japan to Katzenberg: Ease up. Variety, p. 3.
2.
Ang, I.
(1991). Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
3.
Aspen Institute
. (1974). Control of the direct broadcast satellite: Values in conflict. Palo Alto, CA: Aspen Program on Communication and Society.
4.
Babilli, A.
(1990). Understanding international discourse: Political realism and the non-aligned nations. Media, Culture & Society, 12, 309-324.
5.
Bagdikian, B.
(1989, June 12). Lords of the global village. Nation, pp. 805-820.
6.
Baranowski, M. (1992). Television without frontiers: The politics of broadcasting in the European Community. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
7.
Beltran, L.
, & Fox de Cardona, E. (1976). Latin America and the U.S.: Flaws in the free flow of information. Paper presented at the Conference on Fair Communication Policy, East-West Communications Institute, Honolulu.
8.
Blumler, J. (1989). Multi-channel television in the U.S.: Policy lessons for Britain. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
Blumler, J.
, Brynin, M., & Nossiter T. (1986). Broadcasting finance and program quality: An international review. European Journal of Communication, 1, 343-364.
10.
Blumler, J.
, & Nossiter, T. (Eds.). (1991). Broadcasting finance in transition: A comparative handbook. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Blustein, P.
(1990, December 4). Matsushita chief affirms independence. Washington Post, p. B7.
12.
Burgleman, J.
(1986). The future of public service broadcasting: A case study for “a new communications.”European Journal of Communication, 1, 173-201.
13.
Cardoso, E.
(1979). The originality of the copy: The Economic Commission for Latin America and the idea of development. In K. Hill (Ed.), Toward a new strategy for development. Houston, TX: Rothko Chapel.
14.
The changing face of Hollywood
. (1990, October 22). Broadcasting, p. 63.
15.
Council of Europe
. (1980). The state's role vis-à-vis the culture industries. Strasbourg, Germany: Council of Europe.
16.
Court rejects MCA buy challenge
. (1992, March 2). Variety, p. 74.
17.
Fejes, F.
(1984). Critical communication research and media effects: The problem of the disappearing audience. Media, Culture & Society, 6, 219-232.
18.
Fleming, M.
(1990, April 18). Execs re euro TV market: Watch out!Variety, pp. S-1, 76.
19.
Fox, E.
(Ed.). (1988). Media and politics in Latin America: The struggle for democracy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Ganguly, K.
(1991). Alien[ated] readers: Harlequin romances and the politics of popular culture. Communication, 12(2), 129-150.
21.
Garnham, N.
(Ed.). (1989). Western European broadcasting [Special issue]. Media, Culture & Society, 11(1).
22.
Garnham, N.
(1990). Capitalism and communication: Global culture and the economics of information. London: Sage.
23.
Gitlin, T.
(1983). Inside prime time. New York: Pantheon.
24.
Golding, P.
, & Murdock, G. (1979). Making the news. London: Longman.
25.
Gomery, D.
(1989). Media economics: Terms of analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 11, 43-60.
26.
González, J.
(1987). Los frentes culturales: Culturas, mapas, poderes y luchas por las definiciones legitimas de los sentidios sociales de la vida. Estudios sobre las culturas contemporaneas, 1(3), 1-44.
27.
González, J.
(1988). La cofradía de las emociones (in)terminables: Construir las telenovelas mexicanas. Estudios sobre las culturas contemporaneas, 2(4/5), 13-65.
28.
González, J.
(1990). Las vetas del encanto (por los veneros de la producción mexicana de telenovelas). Paper presented at the colloquium, “La televisión en español: Una perspectiva global,”University of California, Berkeley.
29.
Hooked by Hollywood.
(1991, September 21). The Economist, pp. 79, 80.
30.
Jameson, F.
(1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53-92.
31.
Jaramillo, O.
, & Schwarz, C. (1986). Hispanic American critical communication research in its historical context. In R. Atwood & E. McAnany (Eds.), Communication and Latin American society: Trends in critical research, 1965-1985. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32.
Kivikuru, U.
(1988). From import to modeling: Finland—an example of old periphery dependency. European Journal of Communication, 3, 9-34.
33.
Laskin, P.
, & Chayes, A. (1974). A brief history of the issues. In Control of direct broadcast satellites: Values in conflict. Palo Alto, CA: Aspen Program on Communication and Society.
34.
Lull, J.
(Ed.). (1988). World families watch television. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Mahamdi, Y.
(1991). The hidden flows of television programming: Implications for global cultural hegemony. Paper presented at the Fourth International Television Studies Conference, London.
36.
Mahamdi, Y. (1992). Television, globalization and cultural hegemony: The evolution and structure of international television. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
37.
Martín-Barbero, J.
(Ed.). (1991). Reception: Use of media and culture consumption [Special section]. Diálogos de la comunicación, 30, 4-30.
38.
Mattelart, A.
, & Dorfman, A. (1975). How to read Donald Duck (D. Kunzle, Trans.). New York: International General. (Original work published 1971)
39.
Mattelart, A.
, & Mattelart, M. (1979). De l'usage des medias en temps de crise. Paris: Alain Moreau.
40.
Mattelart, A.
, & Mattelart, M. (1990). The carnival of images: Brazilian television fiction. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
41.
McQuail, D.
, & Siune, M. (1986). New media politics: Comparative perspectives in Western Europe. London: Sage.
42.
Melo, E. (1989). Telenovelas and merchandising: The structure of television production in Brazil. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
43.
Miège, B.
(1989). The capitalization of cultural production. New York: International General.
44.
Molina, G. (1989). The production of Mexican television news: The supremacy of corporate rationale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester, Leicester, U.K.
45.
Morley, D.
(1986). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Comedia.
46.
Murdock, G.
(1982). Large corporations and the controls of communication industries. In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Media, Culture & Society. London: Methuen.
47.
Negrine, R.
, & Papathanassapolous, S. (1991). The internationalization of television. European Journal of Communication, 6, 9-32.
48.
Nordenstreng, K.
, & Varis, T. (1974). Television traffic—A one way street?Paris: UNESCO Reports and Papers on Mass Communication.
49.
Pearce, K.
(1991). The world is my franchise. Channels Field Guide, 30-31.
50.
Reibstein, L.
(1991, October 14). Sweet smell of excess. Newsweek, pp. 46-47.
51.
Rudolph, B.
(1989, September 4). Hollywood or bust. Time, pp. 51-52.
52.
Salinas, R.
, & Paldan, L. (1979). Culture in the process of dependent development: Theoretical perspectives. In K. Nordenstreng & H. Schiller (Eds.), National sovereignty and international communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53.
Sanger, D. E.
(1990, November 27). Politics and multinational movies. New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
54.
Sarti, I.
(1981). Communication and cultural dependency: A misconception. In E. McAnany, J. Schnitman, & N. Janus (Eds.), Communication and social structure: Critical studies in mass media research. New York: Praeger.
55.
Schiller, H.
(1969). Mass communications and American empire. New York: A. M. Kelley.
56.
Schiller, H.
(1973). The mind managers. Boston: Beacon.
57.
Schiller, H.
(1976). Communication and cultural domination. New York: International Arts and Sciences.
58.
Schiller, H.
(1989). Culture Inc.New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
Schiller, H.
(1990). The global commercialization of culture. Directions PCDS, 4, 1-4.
60.
Schlesinger, P.
(1987). On national identity: Conceptions and misconceptions criticized. Social Science Information, 26, 219-264.
61.
Sepstrup, P.
(1989). Implications of current developments in Western European broadcasting. Media, Culture & Society, 11, 29-54.
62.
Sinclair, J.
(1990). Neither West nor Third World: The Mexican television industry within the NWICO. Media, Culture & Society, 12, 343-360.
63.
Smith, A.
(1990). Media globalism in the age of consumer sovereignty. Gannett Center Journal, 4(4), 1-17.
64.
Tracey, M.
(1988). Popular culture and the economics of global television. InterMedia, 16(2), 9-25.
65.
Tunstall, J.
(1990). A media industry perspective. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 14. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
66.
Van Dinh, T.
(1979). Nonalignment and cultural imperialism. In K. Nordenstreng & H. Schiller (Eds.), National sovereignty and international communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67.
Vink, N.
(1988). The telenovelas and emancipation: A study of television and social change in Brazil. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.
68.
Wasko, J.
(1982). Movies and money: Financing the American film industry. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
69.
Weinraub, B.
(1991, September 23). At Columbia Pictures, turmoil over top job yields a peek at power. The New York Times, pp. B1, B5.
70.
Weisman, S.
(1991, November 20). Film changes after Japanese buy studio. The New York Times, pp. A1, B6.
