This article presents a dynamic model of dyadic social interaction. It is shown that a set of simple deterministic arithmetic operations representing basic assumptions about social-involvement behavior can lead to a variety of complex outcomes, including asymptotically stable behavior, self-sustaining periodic behavior, and chaotic behavior. These outcomes illustrate the emergence of macroscopic interaction-level properties from microscopic individual-level rules.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Buder, E. H.
(1986). Coherence of speech rhythms in conversations: Autocorrelation analysis of fundamental voice frequency (Toronto Semiotic Circle Monograph No. 2). Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
2.
Buder, E. H.
, & Ritchie, L. D. (1989, May). Are the data random or merely chaotic? Chaos theory and the limits of prediction. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
3.
Cappella, J. N.
(1976). Modeling interpersonal communication systems as a pair of machines coupled through feedback. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 59-85). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Cappella, J. N.
(1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior: Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 101-132.
5.
Cappella, J. N.
(1983). Conversational involvement: Approaching and avoiding others. In J. M. Wiemann & R. P. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 113-148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Cohn, J. F.
, & Tronick, E. Z. (1988). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: Influence is bidirectional and unrelated to periodic cycles in either partner's behavior. Developmental Psychology, 24, 386-392.
7.
Coleman, J. S.
(1987). Microfoundations and macrosocial behavior. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 153-173). Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Collins, R.
(1987). Interaction ritual chains, power, and property: The micro-macro connection as an empirically based theoretical problem. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch, & N. J. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 193-206). Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Day, K. D.
, & Koper, R. J. (1990, June). Living in chaos: Exploration of a simple non-linear model of dyadic interaction. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Dublin.
10.
Devaney, R. L.
(1989). An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Fink, E. L.
, & Huber, K. C. (1977). Self-awareness and definitional processes within dyadic interaction: Simulation of a dynamic system. In X.J.R. Avula (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mathematical Modeling (Vol. 5, pp. 2617-2626). Rolla: University of Missouri.
12.
Glass, L.
, & Mackey, M. C. (1988). From clocks to chaos: The rhythms of life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Gleick, J.
(1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.
14.
Kaplowitz, S. A.
, & Fink, E. L. (in press). Dynamics of attitude change. In R. L. Levine & H. E. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Analysis of dynamic psychological systems (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum.
15.
Kaplowitz, S. A.
, Fink, E. L., & Bauer, C. L. (1983). A dynamic model of the effect of discrepant information on unidimensional attitude change. Behavioral Science, 28, 233-250.
16.
Lester, B. M.
, Hoffman, J., & Brazelton, T. B. (1985). The rhythmic structure of mother-infant interaction in term and preterm infants. Child Development, 56, 15-27.
17.
May, R. M.
(1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459-467.
18.
McPhee, R. D.
, & Poole, M. S. (1982). Mathematical modeling in communication research: An overview. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 159-191). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
19.
Newtson, D. L.
(in press). The dynamics of action and interaction. In L. Smith & E. Thelen (Eds.), Applications of dynamical systems theory to human development. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
Pavitt, C.
, & Cappella, J. N. (1979). Coorientational accuracy in interpersonal and small group discussions: A literature review, model, and simulation. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 123-156). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
21.
Poundstone, W.
(1985). The recursive universe. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
22.
Rice, R. E.
, & Barnett, G. A. (1986). Group communication networking in an information environment: Applying metric multidimensional scaling. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 315-338). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Richter, F. M.
(1986). Non-linear behavior. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Ruelle, D.
(1989). Chaotic evolution and strange attractors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Thompson, J.M.T.
, & Stewart, H. B. (1986). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: Geometrical methods for engineers and scientists. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
26.
Tutzauer, F.
(1987). Exponential decay and damped harmonic oscillation as models of the bargaining process. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 217-240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Warner, R. M.
(1988). Rhythm in social interaction. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 63-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
