This experiment examines the impact of messages on subsequent beliefs about social groups. As a result of probable differences between the processing of familiar versus unfamiliar social information, nonfiction messages are expected to influence beliefs about social group member characteristics more than do fiction messages only when the social group described is relatively familiar. The experiment is a 2 × 2 within-subjects design, with 16 stimuli arranged in a 4 × Greco-Latin square. Twenty-four subjects received one of four sets of prose excerpts, each excerpt labeled as fiction or nonfiction and manipulated to refer to a familiar or unfamiliar social group. Interactions between familiarity and fiction / nonfiction status on beliefs about social group member characteristics and on confidence in belief estimates are found. It is concluded that the impact of fiction messages about unfamiliar peoples on readers' beliefs may well be equal to or greater than that of nonfiction messages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adoni, H.
, Cohen, A. A., & Mane, S. (1984). Social reality and television news: Perceptual dimensions of social conflicts in selected life areas. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 33-49.
2.
Andersen, S. M.
, & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 235-246.
3.
Aslin, T. M.
, & Rothschild, M. L. (1987). An introduction to a cognitive-behavioral perspective on consumer behavior. In M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 15, p. 556). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
4.
Atkin, C.
(1983). Effects of realistic TV violence vs. fictional violence on aggression. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 615-621.
5.
Berkowitz, L.
, & Alioto, J. T. (1973). The meaning of an observed event as a determinant of its aggressive consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 206-217.
6.
Britton, B. K.
, & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 421-436.
7.
Calfee, R. C.
(1985). Experimental methods in psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8.
Cantor, N.
, & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38-48.
9.
Carlston, D. E.
(1980). The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 303-328.
10.
Carlston, D. E.
, & Skowronski, J. J. (1986). Trait memory and behavior memory: The effects of alternative pathways on impression judgment response times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 5-13.
11.
Chaiken, S.
(1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 742-766.
12.
Crocker, J.
, Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Schematic bases of belief change. In R. Eisner (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 197-226). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Cronbach, L.
(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
14.
Fazio, R. H.
, Chen, J., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 339-357.
15.
Fazio, R. H.
, & Zanna, M. P. (1978). On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence. Journal of Personality, 46, 228-243.
16.
Feshbach, S.
(1972). Reality and fantasy in filmed violence. In J. P. Murray, E. A. Rubinstein, & G. A. Comstock (Eds.), Television and social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 318-354) (DHHS Publication no. HSM 72-9057J). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17.
Fiske, S. T.
, & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In B. Jennings & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (1989). The effects of fictional information on real-world judgments. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, Department of Psychology, New Haven, CT.
20.
Glass, G. V.Peckham, P. D.
, & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analysis of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-288.
21.
Graesser, A. C.
(1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22.
Graesser, A. C.
, Hauft-Smith, K., Cohen, A. D., & Pyles, L. D. (1980). Advanced outlines, familiarity, and text genre on retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 209-220.
23.
Greenberg, B. S.
(1982). Television and role socialization: An overview. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior (pp. 179-190). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
24.
Hovland, C. I.
, Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
25.
Kahneman, D.
, & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
26.
Nisbett, R. E.
, & Kunda, Z. (1985). Perception of social distributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 297-311.
27.
Nisbett, R. E.
, & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28.
Petty, R. E.
, & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Potter, W. J.
(1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 159-174.
30.
Potter, W. J.
(1988). Perceived reality in television effects research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32, 23-41.
31.
Schank, R. C.
, & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Srull, T. K.
(1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 2-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Srull, T. K.
, Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 316-345.
34.
Weber, C.
, & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.
35.
Winer, B. J.
(1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
Wu, C.
, & Shaffer, D. R. (1987). Susceptibility to persuasive appeals as a function of source credibility and prior experience with the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 677-688.
37.
Wyer, R. S.
, & Martin, L. L. (1986). Person memory: The role of traits, group stereotypes, and specific behaviors in the cognitive representation of persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 661-675.
38.
Wyer, R. S.
, & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322-359.
