This study examines the effect of issue obtrusiveness on the agenda-setting effects of the national network television news. Two competing models are tested: (a) the obtrusive contingency, which holds that agenda-setting effects decrease as the obtrusiveness of, or amount of personal experience with, an issue increases, and (b) the cognitive-priming contingency, which posits just the opposite−that agenda-setting effects increase as obtrusiveness increases. Findings provide no support for the obtrusive contingency; some support is found for cognitive priming. Only modest support for the basic agenda-setting hypothesis is found. Alternative hypotheses are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achen, C. H.
(1982). Interpreting and using regression. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Atwater, T.
, Salwen, M. B., & Anderson, R. B. (1985). Media agenda-setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 393-397.
3.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
(1985). The origins of individual media system dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12, 485-510.
4.
Ball-Rokeach, S. J.
, & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass media effects. Communication Research, 3, 3-21.
5.
Becker, L. B.
, McCombs, M. E., & McLeod, J. M. (1975). The development of political cognitions. In S. H. Chaffee (Ed.), Political communication: Issues and strategies for research (pp. 21-63). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Behr, R. L.
, & Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38-57.
7.
Berkowitz, L.
, & Rogers, K. H. (1986). A priming effect analysis of media influences. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 57-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Blood, R. W. (1982). Unobtrusive issues in the agenda-setting role of the press (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 8-A.
9.
Edelstein, A.
(1974). The uses of communication in decision making: A comparative study of Yugoslavia and the United States. New York: Praeger.
10.
Einsiedel, E. F.
, Salomone, K. L., & Schneider, F. P. (1984). Crime: Effects of media exposure and personal experience on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 131-136.
11.
Erbring, L.
, Goldenberg, E., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 16-49.
12.
Eyal, C. H. (1980). Time frame in agenda-setting research: A study of the conceptual and methodological factors affecting the time frame context of the agenda-setting process (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 6052-A.
13.
Gallup, G.
(1985). The Gallup poll: Public opinion 1984. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
14.
Holsti, O. R.
(1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Iyengar, S.
, & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Johnston, J.
(1984). Econometric models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
MacKuen, M. B.
, & Coombs, S. L. (1981). More than news: Media power in public affairs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
McCombs, M.
, & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
19.
Meadow, R. G.
(1973). Cross-media comparison of coverage of the 1972 presidential campaign. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 482-488.
20.
Meyer, C. B.
, & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1976). Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. Science, 192, 27-33.
21.
Palmgreen, P.
, & Clarke, P. (1977). Agenda-setting with local and national issues. Communication Research, 4, 435-452.
22.
Petty, R. E.
, & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
23.
Smith, K. A.
(1987). Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: A time-series analysis. Journalism Monographs, 101.
24.
Sohn, A. B.
(1984). Newspaper agenda-setting and community expectations. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 892-897.
25.
Weaver, D.
, Graber, D., McCombs, M., & Eyal, C. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images and interest. New York: Praeger.
26.
Winter, J. P.
(1981). Contingent conditions in the agenda-setting process. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. de Bock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 3, pp. 235-243). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Zucker, H. G.
(1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook 2 (pp. 225-240). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
