Communication between people from diverse organizational units can facilitate innovation. Employees of a postsecondary educational institution were interviewed to obtain specific incidents of when they tried to solve problems innovatively. The results indicate that employees with cooperative goals, but not those with competitive and independent goals, communicated openly and skillfully, made progress in solving the problem, developed high-quality and creative solutions, efficiently used their resources, felt positive about the experience, and expected to work with others successfully in the future. The predominant reason given for cooperative goals was common objectives. The results suggest that cooperative goals complement the skillful communication of diverse perspectives to foster innovation in an organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barker, J.
, Tjosvold, D., & Andrews, I. R. (1988). Project managers' approach to conflict in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 167-178.
2.
Cosier, R. A.
(1978). The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 295-306.
3.
Deutsch, M.
(1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.
4.
Deutsch, M.
(1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Deutsch, M.
(1980). Fifty years of conflict. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology (pp. 46-77). New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Drucker, P. F.
(1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Principles and practices. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Eisenberg, E. M.
, & Witten, M. G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. Academy of Management Review, 12, 418-426.
8.
Flanagan, J. C.
(1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 327-358.
9.
Funder, D. C.
, & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with intergroup agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
10.
Janis, I. L.
(1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11.
Kanter, R. M.
(1983). Change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
12.
Katz, R.
(1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81-104.
13.
Katz, R.
, & Allen, T. J. (1985). Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 67-87.
14.
Katz, R.
, & Tushman, M. (1979). Communication patterns, project performance and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 139-162.
15.
Keller, R. T.
(1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 715-726.
16.
Keller, R. T.
, & Hoveland, W. E. (1983). Communicators and innovators in research and development organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 742-749.
17.
Lord, R. G.
(1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 87-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
18.
Maier, N.R.F.
(1970). Problem-solving and creativity in individuals and groups. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
O'Keefe, R. D.
, Kernaghan, J. A., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1975). Group cohesiveness: A factor in the adoption of innovations among scientific work groups. Small Group Behavior, 6, 282-292.
20.
Pfeffer, J.
(1981). Power in organizations. Boston: Pitman.
21.
Podsakoff, P. M.
, & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
22.
Porter, M.
(1985) Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
23.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Pacanowsky, J. (1983). Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Shrauger, J. S.
, & Osborne, T. M. (1981). The relative accuracy of self-predictions and judgments by others in psychological assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 322-351.
25.
Spector, P. E.
(1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem?Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438-443.
26.
Tjosvold, D.
(1982). Effects of the approach to controversy on superiors' incorporation of subordinates' information in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 189-193.
27.
Tjosvold, D.
(1983). Effects of departments' interdependence on organizational decision making. Psychological Reports, 53, 851-857.
28.
Tjosvold, D.
(1985). Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of Management, 11, 221-238.
29.
Tjosvold, D.
(1986a). Dynamics of interdependence in organizations. Human Relations, 39, 517-540.
30.
Tjosvold, D.
(1986b). Working together to get things done: Managing for organizational productivity. Boston: Lexington.
31.
Tjosvold, D.
(1987). Effects of shared responsibility and goal interdependence on controversy and decision making between departments. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 7-18.
32.
Van Berklom, M.
, & Tjosvold, D. (1981). Effects of social context on engaging in controversy. Journal of Psychology, 107, 141-145.
33.
Van de Ven, A. H.
(1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
34.
Wanous, J. P.
, & Youtz, M. A. (1986). Solution diversity and the quality of group decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 149-159.
35.
Watson, D.
, & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
