People act in ways that sometimes violate social expectations or role requirements. To bridge the gap between action and expectation, and thus prevent conflict, the offending party can provide an account, which is an explanation of the behavior in question. This article examines situations in work organizations in which a boss refuses a subordinate's request, thus failing to meet the subordinate's expectations. Specifically, we examine the effects of a boss's causal account, which is an explanation claiming mitigating circumstances for the refusal, on subordinate reactions that might induce conflict (e.g., anger, complaints). In a survey of 121 currently employed subordinates, it was found that the mere claim of mitigating circumstances does not explain the influence of a causal account in lessening conflict; rather, it is the adequacy of reasoning in support of the claim and the boss's sincerity in communicating the causal account that explain the variance in subordinates' reactions. The implications of these results for an analysis of accounts as a conflict-management strategy are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J. L.
(1961). Philosophical papers. London: Oxford University Press.
2.
Averill, J. R.
(1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
Barnard, C. I.
(1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Baron, R. A.
(1988). Attributions and organizational conflict: The mediating role of apparent sincerity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 111-127.
5.
Bies, R. J.
(1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
Bies, R. J. (1988a). The delivery of bad news in organizations: Managerial strategies and tactics. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
Bies, R. J.
(1988b). Managing conflict before it happens: The role of accounts. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach. New York: Praeger.
8.
Bies, R. J. (in press-a). Beyond “vocie”: The influence of decision-maker justification and sincerity on judgements of procedural justice. Representative Research in Social Psychology.
9.
Bies, R. J. (in press-b). The justification of bad news: A managerial strategy of liability reduction. The Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal.
10.
Bies, R. J.
, & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
11.
Bies, R. J.
, & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accouts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
12.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (in press). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal.
13.
Bies, R. J.
, & Tripp, T. M. (1988, April). Attributional conflict and third party judgments. Paper presented at the meeting of TIMS/ORSA, Washington, DC.
14.
Blumstein, P. W.
(1974). The honoring of accounts. American Sociological Review, 39, 551-566.
15.
Brown, L. D.
(1983). Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Cody, M. J.
, & McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). Models for the sequential construction of accounting episodes: Situational and interactional constraints on message selection and evaluation. In R. Street & J. Capella (Eds.), Sequence and pattern in communicative behavior (pp. 50-69). London: Arnold.
17.
Coser, L. A.
(1956). The function of social conflict. New York: The Free Press.
18.
Deutsch, M.
(1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Felstiner, W. L. F.
, Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15, 631-654.
20.
Ferguson, T. J.
, & Rule, B. G. (1983). An attributional perspective on anger and aggression. In R. G. Geen & E. I. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews (Vol. 1, pp. 41-74). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Flanagan, J. C.
(1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
22.
Folger, R.
, & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.
23.
Goffman, E.
(1952). On cooling out the mark: Some aspects of adaptation to failure. Psychiatry, 15, 451-463.
24.
Goffman, E.
(1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Gioia, D. A.
, & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1986). Cognition-behavior connections: Attributions and verbal behavior in leader-subordinate interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 197-229.
26.
Greenberg, J.
(1986). Determinants of perceived fairness in performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
27.
Harré, R.
(1977). The ethnogenic approach: Theory and practice. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 283-314). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Harré, R.
, & Secord, P. F. (1973). The explanation of social behavior. New York: Littlefield, Adams.
29.
Izraeli, D.
, & Jick, T. D. (1983). The art of saying no: On the management of refusals in organizations. In P. J. Frost, V. F. Mitchell, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Organizational reality: Reports from the firing line (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
30.
Kahneman, D.
, Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Kanter, R. M.
(1983). The change masters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32.
Lissak, R. I.
, & Sheppard, B. H. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on conflict intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 45-65.
33.
March, J. G.
, & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
34.
McLaughlin, M. L.
(1984). Conversation: How talk is organized. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
McLaughlin, M. L.
, Cody, M. J., & O'Hair, H. D. (1983). The management of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior. Human Communication Research, 9, 208-224.
36.
McLaughlin, M. L.
, Cody, M. J., & Rosenstein, N. E. (1983). Account sequences in conversations between strangers. Communication Monographs, 50, 102-125.
37.
McGuire, W. J.
(1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
38.
Nord, W. R.
(1987, October). On the study of conflict and false peace. Paper presented at the Conflict and Change Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
39.
Pelz, D. C.
(1952). Influence: A key to effective leadership in the first-line supervisor. Personnel, 29, 209-217.
40.
Pruitt, D. G.
, & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, impasse, and resolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
41.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 549-599). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
42.
Rubin, J. Z.
, Brockner, J., Eckenrode, J., Enright, M. A., & Johnson-George, C. (1980). Weakness as strength: Test of a “my hands are tied” ploy in bargaining. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 216-221.
43.
Schlenker, B. R.
(1980). Impression management. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44.
Schönbach, P.
(1980). A category system for account phases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 195-200.
45.
Scott, M. B.
, & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
46.
Shapiro, D. L. (1986). Deceptive communication in the bargaining context: Does hedging enhance the bluffer's chance of gaining trust, pardon, and integrative agreements? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North-western University, Evanston, IL.
47.
Sheppard, B. H.
, & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161-176.
48.
Simon, H. A.
(1947). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press.
49.
Snyder, C. R.
, Higgins, R. L., & Stucky, R. J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in search of social grace. New York: Wiley.
50.
Stokes, R.
, & Hewitt, J. P. (1976). Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 838-849.
51.
Tedeschi, J. T.
, & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies in impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior (pp. 271-309). New York: Academic Press.
52.
Thomas, K. W.
(1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889-936). Chicago: Rand McNally.
53.
Thomas, K. W.
, & Pondy, L. R. (1977). Toward an “intent” model of conflict management among principal parties. Human Relations, 12, 1089-1102.
54.
Thomas, K. W.
, & Schmidt, W. H. (1976). A survey of managerial interests with respect to conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 315-318.
55.
Tompkins, P. K.
, & Cheney, G. (1983). Account analysis of organizations: Decision making and identification. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 123-146). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Walton, R. E.
, & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
Weiner, B.
, Amirkhan, J., Folkes, V. S., & Verette, J. A. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 316-324.
58.
Wood, R. E.
, & Mitchell, T. R. (1981). Manager behavior in a social context: The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 356-378.
59.
Zajonc, R. B.
(1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
