Bach, G. P.
, & Wyden, P. (1968). The intimate enemy: How to fight fair in love and marriage. New York: Avon Books.
2.
Bartos, O. J.
(1966). Concession-making in experimental negotiations. In J. Berger, M. Zeldich, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 3-28). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
Brown, B. R.
(1977). Face-saving and face-restoration in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations (pp. 275-300). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Deutsch, M.
(1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Donohue, W. A.
, Diez, M. E., & Hamilton, M. (1984). Coding naturalistic negotiation interaction. Human Communication Research, 10, 403-425.
6.
Druckman, D.
(1967). Dogmatism, prenegotiation experiences, and simulated group representation as determinants of dyadic behavior in a bargaining situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 279-290.
7.
Druckman, D.
(1968). Prenegotiation experience and dyadic conflict resolution in a bargaining situation. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 4, 367-383.
8.
Fairhurst, G. T.
(1986). Male-female communication on the job: Literature review and commentary. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 83-116). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Folger, J. P.
, & Poole, M. S. (1984). Working through conflict. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
10.
Frost, J.
, & Wilmot, W. (1978). Interpersonal conflict. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
11.
Gottman, J. M.
(1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
12.
Gulliver, P. H.
(1979). Disputes and negotiations: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Hawes, L. C.
, & Smith, D. H. (1973). A critique of assumptions underlying the study of communication in conflict. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59, 423-435.
14.
Hirokawa, R. Y.
(1983). Group communication and problem solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
15.
Hopmann, P. T.
, & Smith, T. C. (1978). An application of a Richardson process model: Soviet-American interactions in the test ban negotiations 1962-1963. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), The negotiation process: Theories and application (pp. 149-174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Johnson, D. W.
(1971). Role reversal: A summary and review of the research. International Journal of Group Tensions, 1, 318-334.
17.
Kelman, H. C.
, & Cohen, S. P. (1976). The problem-solving workshop: A social psychological contribution to the resolution of international conflicts. Journal of Peace Research, 13, 79-90.
18.
Kimmel, M. J.
, Pruitt, D. G., Magenau, J. M., Konar-Goldband, E., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 9-22.
19.
Krauss, R. M.
, & Deutsch, M. (1966). Communication in interpersonal bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 572-577.
20.
Mather, L.
, & Yngvesson, B. (1980-1981). Language, audience, and the transformation of disputes. Law & Society Review, 15, 775-910.
21.
Michelini, R. L.
(1971). Effect of prior interaction, contact, strategy, and expectation of meeting on game behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 97-107.
22.
Nieva, V. F.
, & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.
23.
Pondy, L. R.
(1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296-320.
24.
Poole, M. S.
(1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
25.
Poole, M. S.
(1983). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206-232.
26.
Pruitt, D. G.
, & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1982). The development of integrative agreements in social conflicts. In V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Living with other people (pp. 151-181). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Prutt, D. G.
, & Gleason, J. M. (1978). Threat capacity and the choice between independence and interdependence. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 4, 252-255.
28.
Pruitt, D. G.
, & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of intergrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
29.
Pruitt, D. G.
, & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflicts: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
30.
Putnam, L. L.
(in press). Reframing integrative and distributive bargaining: A process perspective. In B. H. Sheppard, R. J. Lewicki, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Geist, P. (1985). Argument in bargaining: An analysis of the reasoning process. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 225-245.
32.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Jones, T. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171-191.
33.
Putnam, L. L.
, & Sotirin, P. (1985, May). Structural contradictions in a teachers' bargaining context. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Honolulu.
34.
Rubin, J.
, & Brown, B. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
35.
Rummel, R. J.
(1976). Understanding conflict and war (Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36.
Selby, S. M.
, & Merry, A. N. (1986). Mediation settlement strategies. Law and Policy, 8, 7-32.
37.
Thomas, K.
(1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889-935). Chicago: Random House.
38.
Walton, R. E.
, & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGrawHill.
39.
Wilson, S. R.
, & Putnam, L. L. (in press). Interaction goals and argument functions as schemes for organizing research on argument in bargaining. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 13. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
