Two issues in clutivation research were considered. First, because cultivation methodology contains an apparent response bias, relationships were examined between television exposure and positive statements of social perceptions: faith in others, life control, interpersonal connection, political efficacy, and safety. Second, an instrumental media uses and effects model was tested. Social perceptions were expected to be linked to viewing selectivity, intention, perceived realism, and attention. Questionnaires were administered to 392 adults. Partial correlations showed television exposure to be unrelated to the social attitudes; program selectivity was related to all social attitudes except interpersonal connection. Hierarchical regression analyses added that individual demographic differences, program selectivity, and perceived realism accounted for most of the variance in personal perceptions. Methodological and conceptual implications were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blank, D. M.
(1977). The Gerbner violence profile. Journal of Broadcasting, 21, 273-279.
2.
Bryant, J.
, Carveth, R. A., & Brown, D. (1981). Television viewing and anxiety: An experimental examination. Journal of Communication, 31(1), 106-119.
3.
Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L.
, & Mayes, S. (1981). Soap opera viewing: The cultivation effect. Journal of Communication, 31(3), 108-115.
4.
Campbell, A.
, Converse, P., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1964). The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Campbell, D. (1973). Unpublished papers, Department of Psychology, Northwestern University. In J. P. Robinson & P. R. Shaver, Measures of social psychological attitudes (rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
6.
Carveth, R.
, & Alexander, A. (1985). Soap opera viewing motivations and the cultivation process. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29, 259-273.
7.
Cegala, D. J.
(1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30, 109-121.
8.
Christie, R.
(1973). Personal communication. In J. P. Robinson & P. R. Shaver, Measures of social psychological attitudes (rev. ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research.
9.
Doob, A. N.
, & Macdonald, G. E. (1979). Television viewing and fear of victimization: Is the relationship causal?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 170-179.
10.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
, U.S. Department of Justice. (1986). Crime in the United States: Uniform crime reports. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
Gerbner, G.
, & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 173-199.
12.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Eleey, M. F., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., & Signorielli, N. (1977). TV violence profile no. 8: The highlights. Journal of Communication, 27(2), 171-180.
13.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Jackson-Beeck, M., Jeffries-Fox, S., & Signorielli, N. (1978). Cultural indicators: Violence profile no.9. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 176-207.
14.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10-29.
15.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1980). Aging with television: Images on television drama and conceptions of social reality. Journal of Communication, 30(1), 37-47.
17.
Gerbner, G.
, Gross, L., Signorielli, N., Morgan, M., & Jackson-Beeck, M. (1979). The demonstration of power: Violence profile no. 10. Journal of Communication, 29(3), 177-196.
18.
Gunter, B.
(1985). Dimensions of television violence. New York: St. Martin's Press.
19.
Gunter, B.
, & Wober, M. (1983). Television viewing and public trust. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 174-176.
20.
Hawkins, R. P.
, & Pingree, S. (1981). Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291-301.
21.
Hawkins, R. P.
, & Pingree, S. (1982). Television's influence on social reality. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties (DHHS Publication No. ADM 82-1196, Vol. 2, pp. 224-247). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22.
Hirsch, P. M.
(1980). The “scary world” of the nonviewer and other anomalies: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.'s findings on cultivation analysis, part I. Communication Research, 7, 403-456.
23.
Horton, D.
, & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.
24.
Hughes, M.
(1980). The fruits of cultivation analysis: A reexamination of some effects of television watching. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 287-302.
25.
Lenski, G. E.
, & Leggett, J. C. (1960). Caste, class, and deference in the research interview. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 463-467.
26.
Levy, M. R.
, & Windahl, S. (1984). Audience activity and gratifications: A conceptual clarification and exploration. Communication Research, 11, 51-78.
27.
Lull, J.
(1980). The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 6, 197-209.
28.
Morgan, M.
(1982). Television and adolescents' sex role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 947-955.
29.
Morgan, M.
(1984). Heavy television viewing and perceived quality of life. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 499-504, 740.
30.
Morgan, M.
(1986). Television and the erosion of regional diversity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 123-139.
31.
Ogles, R. M.
, & Hoffner, C. (1987). Film violence and perceptions of crime: The cultivation effect. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 384-394). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Perse, E. M.
(1986). Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 175-193.
33.
Pingree, S.
, & Hawkins, R. (1981). U.S. programs on Australian television: The cultivation effect. Journal of Communication, 31(1), 97-105.
34.
Potter, W. J.
(1986). Perceived reality and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 159-174.
35.
Reiss, A. J., Jr.
, Duncan, O. D., Hatt, P. K., & North, C. C. (1961). Occupations and social status. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
36.
Roberts, D. F.
, & Maccoby, N. (1985). Effects of mass communication. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 593-598). New York: Random House.
37.
Rosenberg, M.
(1957). Occupations and values. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
Rotter, J. B.
(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1-28.
39.
Rotter, J. B.
(1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
40.
Rubin, A. M.
(1978). Child and adolescent television use and political socialization. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 125-129.
41.
Rubin, A. M.
(1981). An examination of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 8, 141-165.
42.
Rubin, A. M.
(1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting, 27, 37-51.
43.
Rubin, A. M.
(1986). Uses, gratifications, and media effects research. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 281-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Rubin, A. M.
, & Perse, E. M. (1987). Audience activity and television news gratifications. Communication Research, 14, 58-84.
45.
Rubin, A. M.
, Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155-180.
46.
Rubin, A. M.
, & Rubin, R. B. (1982). Contextual age and television use. Human Communication Research, 8, 228-244.
47.
Rubin, R. B.
, & Rubin, A. M. (1982). Contextual age and television use: Reexamining a life-position indicator. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 583-604). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Schuman, H.
, & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.
49.
Signorielli, N.
(1986). Selective television viewing: A limited possibility. Journal of Communication, 36(3), 64-76.
50.
Slater, D.
, & Elliott, W. R. (1982). Television's influence on social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, 69-79.
51.
Smith, R.
(1986). Television addiction. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 109-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Srole, L.
(1956). Social integration and certain corollaries: An exploratory study. American Sociological Reviews, 21, 709-716.
53.
Tamborini, R.
, Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1984). Fear and victimization: Exposure to television and perceptions of crime and fear. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 492-513). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
54.
Tan, A. S.
(1979). TV beauty ads and role expectations of adolescent female viewers. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 283-288.
55.
Tan, A. S.
, & Tan, G. (1979). Television use and self-esteem of blacks. Journal of Communication, 29(1), 129-135.
56.
Tunstall, J.
(1977). The media are American. New York: Columbia University Press.
57.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
(1980). Census of the population and housing (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
58.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
(1982). 1980 census of population: General population characteristics. Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
59.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
(1983a). 1980 census of population: General population characteristics. U.S. summary. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
60.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
(1983b). 1980 census of population: General social and economic characteristics. Ohio. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
61.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.
(1983c). 1980 census of population: General social and economic characteristics. U.S. summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Postal Service.
(1986). National five-digit zip code and post office directory. Washington, DC: Author.
63.
Volgy, T. J.
, & Schwarz, J. E. (1980). TV entertainment programming and sociopolitical attitudes. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 150-155.
64.
Weaver, J.
, & Wakshlag, J. (1986). Perceived vulnerability to crime, criminal victimization experience, and television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 141-158.
65.
Windahl, S.
(1981). Uses and gratifications at the crossroads. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. de Bock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 174-185). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
66.
Wober, J. M.
(1978). Televised violence and paranoid perception: The view from Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 315-321.
67.
Wober, J. M.
(1986). The lens of television and the prism of personality. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 205-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68.
Wober, M.
, & Gunter, B. (1982). Television and personal threat: Fact or artifact? A British survey. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 239-247.
69.
Wober, J. M.
, & Gunter, B. (1986). Television audience research at Britain's Independent Broadcasting Authority, 1974-1984. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30, 15-31.
70.
Wrightsman, L. S., Jr.
(1964). Measurement of philosophies of human nature. Psychological Reports, 14, 743-751.
71.
Zillmann, D.
, & Wakshlag, J. (1985). Fear of victimization and the appeal of crime drama. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 141-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
