This article investigates a new communication medium—public computer conferencing—by separately and jointly analyzing two basic aspects of human communication: (1) content, the extent to which such systems can support socioemotional communication, and (2) connectivity, communication patterns among system users. Results indicate that (1) computer-mediated communication systems can facilitate a moderate exchange of socioemotional content and (2) basic network roles did not generally differ in percentage of socioemotional content. Some fundamental issues in analyzing content and networks in computer-mediated systems, such as structural equivalence versus cohesion network approaches, are discussed in light of these results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R. F.
(1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Barnett, G.
, & Rice, R. E. (1985). Longitudinal non-Euclidean networks: Applying Galileo. Social Networks, 7(4), 287-322.
3.
Blankenhorn, D.
(1986, July-August). Is computer conferencing finally beginning to mature?Business Communications Review, pp. 18-22.
4.
Burstyn, H.
(1983). Electronic mail: Evolving from intracompany to intercompany. In A. Smith (Ed.), AFIPS conference proceedings: 1983 national computer conference (Vol. 52, pp. 379-383). Arlington, VA: AFIPS Press.
5.
Cathart, R.
, & Gumpert, G. (1983). Mediated interpersonal communication: Toward a new typology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 267-277.
6.
Chesebro, J.
(1985). Computer-mediated interpersonal communication. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 202-224). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
Danowski, J.
(1982). Computer-mediated communication: A network-based content analysis using a CBBS conference. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 905-924). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Danowski, J.
, & Edison-Swift, P. (1985). Crisis effects on intraorganizational computer-based communication. Communication Research, 12(2), 251-270.
9.
Edinger, J.
, & Patterson, M. (1983). Nonverbal involvement and social control. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 30-56.
10.
Ettema, J.
(1985). Explaining information system use with system-monitored vs. self-reported use measures. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 381-387.
11.
Farace, R.
, Monge, P., & Russell, H. (1977). Communicating and organizing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
Finn, T. A.
(1986). Process and structure in computer-mediated group communication. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior (Vol. 2). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
13.
Fowler, G.
, & Wackerbarth, M. (1980). Audio teleconferencing versus face-to-face conferencing: A synthesis of the literature. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 236-252.
14.
Freeman, L.
(1980). Q-analysis and the structure of friendship networks. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12(3), 367-378.
15.
Freeman, L.
(1984). The impact of computer-based communication on the social structure of an emerging scientific specialty. Social Networks, 6, 201-221.
16.
Glossbrenner, A.
(1983). The complete handbook of personal computer communications. New York: St. Martin's.
17.
Hiemstra, G.
(1982). Teleconferencing, concern for face, and organizational culture. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 874-904). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Hiltz, S. R.
(1978a). Controlled experiments with computerized conferencing: Results of a pilot study. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 4(5), 11-12.
19.
Hiltz, S. R.
(1978b). The computer conference. Journal of Communication, 28(3), 157-163.
20.
Hiltz, S. R.
(1981). The impact of a computerized conferencing system on scientific research communities. Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology Computerized Conferencing and Communications Center.
21.
Hiltz, S. R.
(1983). Online communities: A case study of the office of the future. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Johnson, K., & Agle, G. (1978). Replicating Bales problem-solving experiments on a computerized conference system (Report 8). Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology Computerized Conferencing and Communication Center.
23.
Hiltz, S. R.
, & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Hiltz, S. R.
, & Turoff, M. (1981). The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system. Communications of the ACM, 24(11), 739-751.
25.
Hiltz, S. R.
, Turoff, M., & Johnson, K. (1985). Disinhibition, deindividuation and group process in computerized conferences: A controlled experiment comparing pen name and real name conferences in a large corporation. Newark: New Jersey Institute of Technology Computerized Conferencing and Communications Center.
26.
Johansen, R.
(1977). Social evaluations of teleconferencing. Telecommunications Policy, 1(5), 395-419.
27.
Johansen, R.
(1984). Teleconferencing and beyond: Communications in the office of the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Johansen, R.
, & DeGrasse, R. (1979). Computer-based teleconferencing: Effects on working patterns. Journal of Communication, 29(3), 30-41.
29.
Johnson-Lenz, P.
, Johnson-Lenz, T., & Scher, J. M. (1978). How groups can make decisions and solve problems through computerized conferencing. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 4(5), 15-17.
30.
Kerr, E.
, & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Computer-mediated communication systems. New York: Academic Press.
31.
Kiesler, S.
, Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123-1134.
32.
Kling, R.
(1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys, 11(1), 61-110.
33.
Knoke, D.
, & Kuklinski, J. (1982). Network analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Kochen, M.
(1978). Long-term implications of electronic information exchanges for information science. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 4(1), 22-23.
35.
Koomen, W.
, & Sagel, P. (1977). The prediction of participation in two-person groups. Sociometry, 40, 369-373.
36.
Link Resources.
(1985). Electronic messaging (Continuous Information Services Report). New York: Author.
37.
Meyers, D.
(1985). Home computer communication networks: A first look at BBS. New Orleans: Loyola University, Department of Communications.
38.
Mitchell, J. C.
(1969). The concept and use of social networks. In J. C. Mitchell (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations (pp. 1-50). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
39.
Mosco, V.
(1982). Pushbutton fantasies: Critical perspectives on videotex and information technology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
Neustadt, R.
(1982). The birth of electronic publishing: Legal and economic issues in telephone, cable and over-the-air teletext and videotext. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry.
41.
Olson, M.
, & Lucas, H., Jr. (1982). The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implications for research and practice. Communications of the ACM, 25(11), 838-847.
42.
O'Reilly, C.
, & Pondy, L. (1979). Organizational communication. In S. Kerr (Ed.), Organizational behavior (pp. 119-149). Columbus, OH: Grid.
43.
Panko, R.
(1984). Electronic mail. In K. Takle-Quinn (Ed.), Advances in office automation (Vol. 1). New York: John Wiley.
44.
Phillips, A.
(1982). Computer conferencing: Success or failure?Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 2, 203-218.
45.
Pye, R.
, & Williams, E. (1977, June). Teleconferencing: Is video valuable or is audio adequate?Telecommunications Policy, pp. 230-241.
46.
Rice, R. E.
(1980a). Impacts of organizational and interpersonal computer-mediated communications. In M. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 15, pp. 221-249). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry.
47.
Rice, R. E.
(1980b). Computer conferencing. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 215-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
48.
Rice, R. E.
(1982). Communication networking in computer conferencing systems: A longitudinal study of group roles and system structure. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 925-944). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Rice, R. E.
(in press). Communication technology networks. In B. Dervin (Ed.), Paradigm dialogues: Vol. 2. Exemplars. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
Rice, R. E.
, & Associates. (1984). The new media: Communication, research, and technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
Rice, R. E.
, & Barnett, G. (1986). Group communication networks in electronic space: Applying metric multidimensional scaling. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 315-326). Newbury Park, Ca: Sage.
52.
Rice, R. E.
, & Borgman, C. (1983). The use of computer-monitored data in information science and communication research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 247-256.
53.
Rice, R. E.
, & Case, D. (1983). Computer-based messaging in the university: A description of use and utility. Journal of Communication, 33(1), 131-152.
54.
Rice, R. E.
, & Richards, W., Jr. (1985). An overview of network analysis methods. In B. Dervin & M. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 105-165). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
55.
Richards, W., Jr.
, & Rice, R. E. (1981). NEGOPY network analysis program. Social Networks, 3(3), 215-333.
56.
Rogers, E. M.
, & Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1976). Communication and organizations. New York: Free Press.
57.
Rogers, E. M.
, & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: A new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
58.
Sandler, C.
(1983). Electronic mail: The paperless revolution. PC: The Independent Guide to IBM Personal Computers, 1(9), 52-58.
59.
Short, J.
, Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
60.
Spelt, P.
(1977). Evaluation of a continuing computer conference on simulation. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 9(2), 87-91.
61.
Sproull, L.
(1986). Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 159-169.
62.
Steinfield, C.
(1986). The social dimensions of computer-mediated communications. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 777-804). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
63.
Tapscott, D.
(1982). Office automation: A user-driven method. New York: Plenum.
64.
Turoff, M.
(1978). The EIES experiment: Electronic information exchange system. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 4(5), 9-11.
65.
Tydeman, J.
, Lipinski, H., Adler, R., Nyhan, M., & Zwimpfer, L. (1982). Teletext and videotext in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66.
Tydeman, J.
, Lipinski, H., & Spang, S. (1980). An interactive computer-based approach to aid group problem formulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 16, 311-320.
67.
Uhlig, R.
, Farber, D., & Bair, J. (1979). The office of the future: Communications and computers. New York: North-Holland.
68.
Vallee, J.
(1984). Computer message systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
69.
Vallee, J.
, Johansen, R., Randolph, R., & Hastings, A. (1978). Group communication through computers (Vols. 4, 5). Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future.
70.
Vallee, J.
, Johansen, R., & Spangler, K. (1975). The computer conference: An altered state of communication. Futurist9(6), 116-121.
71.
Willard, D.
, & Strodtbeck, F. (1972). Latency of verbal response and participation in small groups. Sociometry, 35(1), 161-175.
72.
Williams, E.
(1978). Teleconferencing: Social and psychological factors. Journal of Communication, 28, 125-131.
73.
Williams, F.Rice, R. E.
, & Dordick, H. (1985). Behavioral loci of the information society. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 161-182). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
