“KNOWLEDGE GAP” PHENOMENA

Abstract

This article examines two rival explanations for knowledge gaps. One explanation relates to transsituational attributes that is, socioeconomic characteristics) while the second focuses upon situation-specific characteristics that is, policy-relevant personal motivations). Four measures of knowledge levels are employed—technical term familiarity, problem articulation, self-assessed level of informedness, and the ability to define key policy concepts. This study uses three SES measures (education, income, and occupational status) and five motivational measures (types of use of water, involvement in water politics, water policy satisfaction, water policy priority, and extremity of environmental attitudes). The results show that situation-specific factors are the more important influences on knowledge levels, casting doubt on theories suggesting that lower SES persons may be permanently relegated to a public affairs knowledge deficit.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ATKIN, C. (1973) “Instrumental utilities and information seeking,” pp. 205-242 in P. Clarke (ed.) New Models for Mass Communications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

CHAFFEE, S. and J. McLEOD (1973) “Individual versus social predictors of information seeking.”Journalism Q. 50: 237-245.

DILLMAN, D. A. (1978) Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.

DONOHUE, G. A. , P. J. TICHENOR , and C. N. OLIEN (1975) “Mass media and the knowledge gap: a hypothesis reconsidered.”Communication Research 2: 3-23.

DOUGLAS, D. F. , B. H. WESTLEY , and S. H. CHAFFEE (1970) “An information campaign that changed community attitudes.”Journalism Q. 47: 479-487, 492.

ETTEMA, J. S. and F. G. KLINE (1977) “Deficits, differences and ceilings: contingent conditions for understanding the knowledge gap.”Communication Research 4: 179-202.

GENOVA , B.K.L . and B. S. GREENBERG (1979) “Interest in the news and the knowledge gap.”Public Opinion Q. 443: 79-91.

GORDON, R. A. (1968) “Issues in multiple regression.”Amer. J. of Sociology 73: 592-616.

KESSEL, J. (1980) Presidential Campaign Politics. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

10.

MILLER, J. D. , R. W. SUCHNER , and A. M. VOELKER (1980) Citizenship in an Age of Science: Changing Attitudes Among Young Adults. New York: Pergamon.

11.

OLIEN, C. N. , G. A. DONOHUE , and P. J. TICHENOR (1983) “Structure, communication and social power: evolution of the knowledge gap hypothesis,” in E. Wartella and D. C. Whitney (eds.) Mass Communication Review Yearbook, Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

12.

PIERCE, J. C. and N. P. LOVRICH (1984) Water Resources, Democracy and the Technical Information Quandary. New York: Associated Faculty Press.

13.

PIERCE, J. C. and N. P. LOVRICH, Jr. (1980) “Belief systems concerning the environment: the general public, attentive publics and state legislators.”Pol. Behavior 2: 259-286.

14.

PIERCE, J. C. , K. M. BEATTY , and H. R. DOERKSEN (1976) “Rational participation and public involvement in water resource politics,” in J. C. Pierce and H. R. Doerksen (eds.) Water Politics and Public Involvement. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science.

15.

SHELDON, C. H. and N. P. LOVRICH (1982) “Judicial accountability vs. responsibility: balancing the views of voters and judges.”Judicature 65: 470-480.

16.

SHINGI, P. M. and B. MODY (1976) “The communication effects gap: a field experiment on television and agricultural ignorance in India.”Communication Research 3: 171-190.

17.

TICHENOR, P. J. , G. A. DONOHUE , and C. N. OLIEN (1970) “Mass media and differential growth in knowledge.”Public Opinion Q. 34:158-170.