Several recent research efforts have focused on the notion that media dependencies act as causal mechanisms in affecting individuals' information needs and uses of the mass media. The present study examines two separate research positions; one of newspaper and television dependencies acting as latent variables in a causal manner, and the other of primary reliance upon a given medium acting as a contingent condition under which to examine media use. Maximum likelihood estimates of measurement models related to the two propositions are formulated and tested for adequate fit to media use behaviors. Results are interpreted as indicating greater support for analysis of media use behaviors contingent upon medium of primary reliance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BECKER, L. B.
and J. W. FRUIT (1980) “The growth of TV dependence: tracing the origins of the political malaise.” Presented to the International Communication Association annual conference, Acapulco, Mexico.
2.
BECKER, L. B.
and D. C. WHITNEY (1980) “Effects of media dependencies on audience assessment of government.”Communication Research7: 95-120.
3.
BECKER, L. B.
, I. A. SOBOWALE, and W. E. CASEY (1979) “Newspaper and television dependencies: their effects on evaluations of public officials.”J. of Broadcasting23: 465-475.
4.
BURT, R. S.
(1973) “Confirmatory factor-analytic structures and the theory construction process.”Soc. Methods and Research2: 131-189.
5.
DeFLEUR, M. L.
and S. BALL-ROKEACH (1975) Theories of Mass Communication. New York: David McKay.
6.
FINK, E. L.
(1980) “Unobserved variables within structural equation models,” in M. and J. Capella (eds.) Multivariate Techniques in Human Communication Research. New York: Academic Press.
7.
HAMMOND, J. L.
(1973) “Two sources of error in ecological correlations.”Amer. Soc. Rev.38: 764-777.
8.
HOFSTETTER, C. R.
(1978) “News bias in the 1972 campaign: a cross-media comparison.”Journalism Monographs58.
9.
JORESKOG, K. G.
(1974) “Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices,” in R. C. Atkinson et al. (eds.) Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, Volume II. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
10.
JORESKOG, K. G.
(1973) “A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system,” in A. S. Goldberger and O. D. Duncan (eds.) Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Seminar Press.
11.
JORESKOG, K. G.
and D. SORBOM (1980) LISREL Analysis of Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood, Version IV. Chicago: International Education Services.
12.
McLEOD, J. M.
and L. B. BECKER (1981) “The uses and gratifications approach to political communication research,” in D. Nimmo and K. Sanders (eds.) Handbook of Political Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
McLEOD, J. M.
, C. BYBEE, W. D. LUETSCHER, and G. GARRAMONE (1978) “Mass communication and voter volatility.” Presented to the Association for Education in Journalism conference, Seattle, Washington.
14.
McLEOD, J. M.
, C. J. GLYNN, and D. G. McDONALD (1983) “Issues and images: influence of media reliance on voting decisions.”Communication Research10: 37-58.
15.
McLEOD, J. M.
, W. D. LUETSCHER, and D. G. McDONALD (1980) “Beyond mere exposure: media orientations and their impact on political processes.” Presented to the Association for Education in Journalism conference, Houston, Texas.
16.
McLEOD, J. M.
and D. G. McDONALD (1981) Some test-retest reliability coefficients of mass media use and gratification measures. Madison, WI: Mass Communications Research Center.
17.
MEINE, F. J.
(1941) “Radio and the press among young people.”Radio Research 1941.
18.
O'KEEFE, G. J.
, (1980) “Political malaise and reliance on media.”Journalism Q.57: 122-128.
19.
REESE, S. D.
and M. M. MILLER (1981) “Political attitude holding and structure: the effects of newspaper and television news.”Communication Research8: 167-188.
20.
ROBINSON, M. J.
(1975) “American political legitimacy in an era of electronic journalism: reflections on the evening news,” in D. Cater and R. Adler (eds.) Television as a Social Force: New Approaches to TV Criticism. New York: Praeger.
21.
ROBINSON, J. J.
(1976) “Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: the case of `the selling of the pentagon.'”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 70: 409-432.
22.
Roper Organization
(1977) Changing public attitudes toward television and other mass media, 1959-76. New York: Television Information Office.
23.
SARNOFF, D.
(1941) “Possible social effects of television.”Annals of Amer. Academy of Pol. and Social Sci. 213: 145-152.
24.
SPECHT, D. A.
and R. D. WARREN (1976) “Comparing causal models,” in D. R. Heise (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1976. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
WERTS, C. E.
, D. A. ROCK, R. L. LINN, and K. G. JORESKOG (1977) “Validating psychometric assumptions within and between populations.”Educational and Psycho. Measurement37: 863-871.
26.
WHEATON, B.
, B. MUTHEN, D. ALWIN, and G. SUMMERS (1977) “Assessing reliability and stability in panel models.”David Heise (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1977. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
ZIEMKE, D.
and W. D. LUETSCHER (1979) “A cohort analysis of partisanship decline and television dependence.” Presented to the Association for Education in Journalism conference, Houston, Texas.
