Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The results of this investigation of television news support an expectancy value conceptualization that gratifications sought from a media object are a function of a person's beliefs that the object possesses certain attributes mediated by the subjective evaluations of these attributes. The findings parallel those in the expectancy value literature in that the addition of attribute importance to the model adds little to its predictive power. The data also support a prediction (derived from Fishbein's theory) that a belief x evaluation index will have an indirect impact (through gratifications sought) on media exposure. Implications for a uses and gratifications theory of media consumption are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ATKINSON, J. W. (1957) “Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.”Psych. Rev. 64: 359-372.

BLUMLER, J. G. (1979) “The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies.”Communication Research 6: 9-36.

BLUMLER, J. G. and D. McQUAIL (1969) Television in Politics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

BOGART, L. (1965) “The mass media and the blue-collar worker,” in A. Bennett and W. Gomberg (eds.) The Blue Collar World. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

ELLIOT, P. (1974) “Uses and gratifications research: a critique and sociological alternative,” in J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (eds.) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

FISHBEIN, M. (1963) “An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object.”Human Relations 16: 233-240.

FISHBEIN, M. and I. AJZEN (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

GALLOWAY, J. J. and F. L. MEEK (1981) “Audience uses and gratifications: an expectancy model.”Communication Research 8: 435-450.

KELLEY, H. H. (1973) “The processes of causal attribution.”Amer. Psychologist 28: 107-128.

10.

McLEOD, J. M. and L. B. BECKER (1974) “Testing the validity of gratifications measures through political effects analysis,” in J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (eds.) The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

McLEOD, J. M. , C. R. BYBEE , and J. A. DURALL (1982) “Evaluating media performance by gratifications sought and received.”Journalism Q. 59: 3-12.

12.

PALMGREEN, P. and J. D. RAYBURN (1979) “Uses and gratifications and exposure to public television: a discrepancy approach.”Communication Research 6: 155-180.

13.

PALMGREEN, P. , L. A. WENNER , and J. D. RAYBURN (1981) “Gratification discrepancies and news program choice.”Communication Research 8: 451-478.

14.

PALMGREEN, P. (1980) “Relations between gratifications sought and obtained: a study of television news.”Communication Research 7: 161-192.

15.

ROTTER, J. B. (1954) Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

16.

RUBIN, A. (1981) “An examination of television viewing motivations.”Communication Research 8: 141-166.

17.

SWANSON, D. L. (1977) “The uses and misuses of uses and gratifications.”Human Communication Research 3: 214-221.

18.

TOLMAN, E. C. (1932) Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

19.

VAN LEUVEN, J. (1981) “Expectancy theory in media and message selection.”Communication Research 8: 425-434.

20.

VROOM, V. H. (1964) Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley.

21.

WEISS, W. (1976) “Review of `The Uses of Mass Communications.'”Public Opinion Q. 40: 132-133.

22.

WIGGINS, J. S. (1973) Personality and Prediction: Principles of Personality Assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

GRATIFICATIONS SOUGHT AND MEDIA EXPOSURE An Expectancy Value Model

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References