The idea that measures of mass media content might complement survey
research in monitoring social change is as old as public opinion polling
itself. This article argues for social indicators to parallel economic indicators
based on media content. Developed here is one such indicator, the "Green field Index" of Readers' Guide entries. Usefulness of such an index is
argued in terms of recent findings on the "agenda-setting" function of the
media, which imply that public attitudes and opinions may be more closely
correlated with media coverage than with more objective social conditions.
This is illustrated with four separate measures of the "drug problem"
among American youth in the late 1960s and early 1970s, which suggest
that media indicators are as good as objective measures and poll data for
monitoring change. Usefulness of the Greenfield Index is demonstrated in
two applications: (1) to decomposition of the issue of race relations into
more subtle component shifts in media attention, and (2) the exposure of
media coverage of crime and criminal activity as subject to the periodic
cycles that characterize fads. Linked to more objective measures and public
opinion surveys, media indicators like the Greenfield Index afford relatively
inexpensive means to assess social change at the macro level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, D. and D. Gold (1964) "The facilitation effect of social environment ." Public Opinion Q.28: 513-516.
2.
Bauer, R. [ed.] (1966) Social Indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Beal, G.M. et al. (1972) Social Indicators and Societal Monitoring: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: American Elsevier.
4.
Beniger, J.R. (1978a) "Interorganizational response to social change: professional control of drug abuse by youth in two cities, 1972-1973." Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
5.
——— (1978b) "Control theory and social change: toward a synthesis of the system and action approaches," in R. F. Geyer and J. van der Zouwen (eds.) Socle-cybernetics: An Actor-Oriented Social Systems Theory. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
6.
——— (1973) "Proposal for the development of mass media measures for use in the construction and analysis of social indicators." Berkeley: Survey Research Center, University of California .
7.
Carney, T.F. (1972) Content Analysis: A Technique for Systematic Inference from Communication. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.
8.
Cohen, B.C. (1963) The Press, the Public and Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
9.
Duncan, O.D. (1969) Toward Social Reporting: Next Steps. New York: Russell Sage.
10.
Funkhouser, G.R. (1973a) "The issues of the sixties: an exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion." Public Opinion Q.37: 62-75.
11.
——— (1973b) "Trends in media coverage of the issues of the sixties." Journalism Q.50: 533-538.
12.
Gerbner, G. et al. [eds.] (1969) The Analysis of Communication Content. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Greenfield, M. (1961) "The great American morality play." Reporter (June 8): 13-18.
14.
Holsti, O.R. (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Janowitz, M. (1976) "Content analysis and the study of sociopolitical change." J. of Communication26 (Autumn): 10-21.
16.
——— (1968-1969) "Harold Lasswell's contribution to content analysis." Public Opinion Q.32 (Winter): 643-653.
17.
Kroeber, A.L. (1919) "On the principle of order in civilization as exemplified by changes of fashion." Amer. Anthropologist21: 235-263.
18.
Lasswell, H.D. (1935) World Politics and Personality Insecurity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
——— et al. (1947) Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics. New York: George W. Stewart .
20.
Lippmann, W. (1922) Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.
21.
McCombs, M. (1976) "Agenda-setting research: a bibliographic essay ." Pol. Communication Rev.1 (Summer): 1-7.
22.
———and D.L. Shaw (1972) "The agenda-setting function of the media." Public Opinion Q.36: 176-187.
23.
Markoff, J. et al. (1974) "Toward the integration of content analysis and general methodology," in D. R. Heise (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1975. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Mueller, J.E. (1973) War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.
25.
National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress (1966) Technology and the American Economy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
26.
Naisbitt, J. (1976) The Trend Report: A Quarterly Forecast and Evaluation of Business and Social Developments. Washington, DC: Center forPolicy Process.
27.
Richardson, J. and A.L. Kroeber (1940) "Three centuries of women's dress fashions: a quantitative analysis." University of CaliforniaAnthropological Records5, 2: 111-153.
28.
Stone, G. (1976) "Tracing the time-lag in agenda-setting," in M. McCombs and G. Stone (eds.) Studies in Agenda-Setting. Syracuse, NY: Newhouse Communication Research Center, Syracuse University.
29.
Stone, P. (1966) The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
30.
U.S. National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968) ReportWashington, DC: Government Printing Office.
31.
U.S. Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice (1967) The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32.
Yankelovich, D. (1974) The New Morality, A Profile of American Youth in the 70'sNew York: McGraw-Hill.
