This introductory essay describes how our conceptualizations of development have recently shifted from a dominant model to alternative paradigms, thus implying new and different roles for communication in development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beltran S., L.R., ( 1975) “Research ideologies in conflict .”J. of Communication25: 187-193.
2.
Grunig, J.E. (1971) "Communication and the economic decision-making of Colombian peasants." Econ. Development & Cultural Change18: 580-597.
3.
Havens, A. (1972) "Methodological issues in the study of development ." Sociologia Ruralis12: 252-272.
4.
Lerner, D. (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.
5.
Rogers, E.M. (1974) "Social structure and communication strategies in rural development: the communication effects gap and the second dimension of development," in Cornell-CIAT International Symposium on Communication Strategies for Rural Development. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, Institute for International Agriculture.
6.
---and R. Agarwala-Rogers (1976) Communication in Organizations. New York: Free Press.
7.
Rogers, E.M. and S. Danziger (1975) "Nonformal education and communication technology: the second dimension of development and the little media," in T. J. La Belle (ed.) Educational Alternatives in Latin America: Social Change and Social Stratification. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center.
8.
Schramm, W. (1964) Mass Media and National Development. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Univ. Press.
9.
---and D. Lerner [eds.] (1976) Communication and Change: Ten Years After. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawaii/East-West Center Press.
10.
Tichenor, P.J. et al. (1970) "Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge." Public Opinion Q.34: 159-170.