Shaping Interpersonal Communication About Persuasive Media Campaigns by Inducing Critical Versus Collective Orientations

Abstract

Individuals process persuasive campaign messages intra- and interpersonally with the goal of either accurately evaluating the advocacy or defending against it. In an experiment, messages that argued for reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages were presented to regular drinkers (N = 275). They were then forbidden to interact, allowed to interact, or directed to interact by discussion prompts with either a critical or a collective focus. The no-talk condition data showed persuasion whereas unguided talk yielded counter-persuasion (i.e., a boomerang), which was mitigated to an equal degree by the two prompts. Exploration of potential mediating mechanisms revealed that the prompt effects could be attributed to variations in the quantity of on-topic talk, sentence length, cognitive process words, and negations. As all of these findings were strongest among heavy drinkers, the study demonstrated the promise of prompts for promoting campaign-consistent talk and salutary effects among at-risk individuals.

Keywords

sugar-sweetened beverages obesity media campaigns interpersonal communication discussion prompts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andreyeva

(2021). Large state variation in sugar-sweetened beverage purchases: What we learn from the beverage industry data. Current Developments in Nutrition, 5(12), nzab128. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzab128

Beauchamp

G. K.

(2016). Why do we like sweet taste: A bitter tale? Physiology & Behavior, 164(Pt B), 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.007

Boyd

R. L.

Ashokkumar

Seraj

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2022). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app

Brennan

Durkin

S. J.

Wakefield

M. A.

Kashima

(2016). Talking about antismoking campaigns: What do smokers talk about and how does talk influence campaign effectiveness? Journal of Health Communication, 21(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1039675

Brewer

N. T.

Weinstein

N. D.

Cuite

C. L.

Herrington

J. E.

(2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7

Cappella

J. N.

(2018). Perceived message effectiveness meets the requirements of a reliable, valid, and efficient measure of persuasiveness. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 994–997. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy044

Chaiken

Liberman

Eagly

A. H.

(1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman

J. S.

Bargh

J. A.

(Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guilford Press.

David

Cappella

J. N.

Fishbein

(2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00008.x

Dillard

J. P.

S. S.

Cannava

(2022). Talking about sugar-sweetened beverages: Causes, processes, and consequences of campaign-induced interpersonal communication. Health Communication, 37(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1838107

10.

Dillard

J. P.

Peck

(2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003

11.

Dillard

J. P.

Shen

Vail

R. G.

(2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x

12.

Druckman

J. N.

McGrath

M. C.

(2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9, 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1

13.

Du Bois

J. W

. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson

(Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du

14.

Dunlop

S. M.

Kashima

Wakefield

(2010). Predictors and consequences of conversations about health promoting media messages. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 518–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.502537

15.

Eveland

W. P.

Jr. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490443877

16.

Falbe

Thompson

H. R.

Patel

Madsen

K. A.

(2019). Potentially addictive properties of sugar-sweetened beverages among adolescents. Appetite, 133, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.032

17.

Faria

(2024, September 10). Advertising spending of selected beverage brands in the United States in 2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264985/ad-spend-of-selected-beverage-brands-in-the-us/

18.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766

19.

Gastil

Xenos

(2010). Of attitudes and engagement: Clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation. Journal of Communication, 60(2), 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01484.x

20.

Gouran

D. S.

(1990). Factors affecting the decision-making process in the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography: A case study of unwarranted collective judgment. Free Speech Yearbook, 28(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/08997225.1990.10556116

21.

Greenwald

A. G.

(1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In Greenwald

A. G.

Brock

T. C.

Ostrom

T. M.

(Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147–170). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-X

22.

Hendriks

de Bruijn

G. J.

van Den Putte

(2012). Talking about alcohol consumption: Health campaigns, conversational valence, and binge drinking intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17(4), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02080.x

23.

Hendriks

Yzer

(2020). Is involvement a good thing? The undesirable consequences of topical and conversational involvement in the context of alcohol consumption. Journal of Health Communication, 25(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1701587

24.

Hoffman

L. R.

Kleinman

G. B.

(1994). Individual and group in group problem solving the valence model redressed. Human Communication Research, 21(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00338.x

25.

Jeong

Bae

R. E.

(2018). The effect of campaign-generated interpersonal communication on campaign-targeted health outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 33(8), 988–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331184

26.

Katz

Lazarsfeld

P. F.

(1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126234

27.

Keisler

C. A.

(1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. Academic Press.

28.

Knobloch

K. R.

Barthel

M. L.

Gastil

(2020). Emanating effects: The impact of the Oregon citizens’ initiative review on voters’ political efficacy. Political Studies, 68(2), 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719852254

29.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Klein

K. J.

(2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.

30.

Krasikova

D. V.

LeBreton

J. M.

(2012). Just the two of us: Misalignment of theory and methods in examining dyadic phenomena. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027962

31.

Lane

M. M.

Travica

Gamage

Marshall

Trakman

G. L.

Young

Teasdale

S. B.

Dissanayaka

Dawson

S. L.

Orr

Jacka

F. N.

O'Neil

Lawrence

Baker

Rebholz

C. M.

Marx

(2024). Sugar-sweetened beverages and adverse human health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies. Annual Review of Nutrition, 44(1), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-062322-020650

32.

LeBreton

J. M.

Senter

J. L.

(2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.

33.

Lee

S. H.

Park

Lehman

T. C.

Ledsky

Blanck

H. M.

(2023). Occasions, locations, and reasons for consuming sugar-sweetened beverages among US adults. Nutrients, 15(4), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040920

34.

S. S.

Dillard

J. P.

(2024). Campaign-induced interpersonal communication following exposure to strong and weak persuasive messages. Human Communication Research, 50(4), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqae011

35.

Shen

Dillard

J. P.

S. S.

(2024). A content analysis of online messages about sugar-sweetened beverages. Nutrients, 16(7), 1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16071005

36.

Noar

S. M.

Barker

Bell

Yzer

(2020). Does perceived message effectiveness predict the actual effectiveness of tobacco education messages? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Communication, 35(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1547675

37.

Ophir

Walter

(2023). Computational sentiment analysis: Promises and pitfalls. In Nabi

R. L.

Myrick

J. G.

(Eds.), Emotions in the digital world: Exploring affective experience and expression in online interactions (pp. 114–133). Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197520536.003.0007

38.

O’Keefe

D. J.

(2018). Message pretesting using assessments of expected or perceived persuasiveness: Evidence about diagnosticity of relative actual persuasiveness. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx009

39.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

40.

Pinheiro

Bates

; R Core Team. (2024). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (Version 3.1-162). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme

41.

Pomerantz

Heritage

(2012). Preference. In Sidnell

Stivers

(Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch11

42.

R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

43.

Robles

Blitstein

J. L.

Lieberman

A. J.

Barragan

N. C.

Gase

L. N.

Kuo

(2015). The relationship between amount of soda consumed and intention to reduce soda consumption among adults exposed to the choose health LA ‘Sugar Pack’ health marketing campaign. Public Health Nutrition, 18(14), 2582–2591. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980014003097

44.

Shiverdecker

L. K.

LeBreton

J. M.

(2019). A primer on multilevel (random coefficient) regression modeling. In Humphrey

S. E.

LeBreton

J. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 389–422). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000115-018

45.

Southwell

B. G.

Yzer

M. C.

(2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Annals of the International Communication Association, 31(1), 420–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2007.11679072

46.

The Ad Council. (2022, December 14). The Ad Council and Meta encourage parents to ‘Drop the F*Bomb’ with their kids in new campaign to address the fentanyl crisis. https://www.adcouncil.org/learn-with-us/press-releases/the-ad-council-and-meta-encourage-parents-to-drop-the-f-bomb-with-their-kids-in-new-campaign-to-address-the-fentanyl-crisis

47.

Watzlawick

Beavin

J. H.

Jackson

D. D.

(2007). Some tentative axioms of communication. In Watzlawick

Beavin

J. H.

Jackson

D. D.

(Eds.), Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes (pp. 48–71). Norton.

48.

Wilder

(1976). The “law of initial values,” a neglected biological law and its significance for research and practice. In Porges

S. W.

Coles

M. G. H.

(Eds.), Psychophysiology (pp. 38–46). Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.

49.

Zhao

Delahanty

J. C.

Duke

J. C.

MacMonegle

A. J.

Smith

A. A.

Allen

J. A.

Nonnemaker

(2022). Perceived message effectiveness and campaign-targeted beliefs: Evidence of reciprocal effects in youth tobacco prevention. Health Communication, 37(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1839202

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.26 MB

0.00 MB