This study examines how face-to-face (FtF) and computer-mediated communication (CMC) contribute to relationship maintenance and resilience in dual-earning families, a largely overlooked area in family communication research. Guided by the theory of resilience and relational load (TRRL), we test how ongoing FtF and CMC maintenance behaviors predicted well-being across a week among 62 families (i.e., two parents and one adolescent). Using a week-long daily diary and physiological measures (cortisol and IL-6 assays), we assess perceived stress, mental health, and loneliness. Findings suggest that both FtF and CMC maintenance are associated with lower stress and better well-being, with FtF showing somewhat stronger associations on certain outcomes such as loneliness. Additionally, perceived gaps between desired and received maintenance predicted higher and more erratic stress and diminished mental health, underscoring the importance of meeting relational needs. These results highlight how families balance FtF and digital maintenance in everyday life and extend the TRRL by incorporating mixed-media contexts and perceived maintenance gaps.
AbelS.MachinT.BrownlowC. (2021). Social media, rituals, and long-distance family relationship maintenance: A mixed-methods systematic review. New Media & Society, 23(3), 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820958717
2.
AdamE. K.QuinnM. E.TavemierR.McQuillanM. T.DahlkeK. A.GilbertK. E. (2017). Diurnal cortisol slopes and mental and physical health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychneuroendocrinology, 83, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.05.018
3.
AfifiT. D.HarrisonK.ZamanzadehN.CallejasM. A. (2020). Testing the theory of resilience and relational load in dual-earning families: Relationship maintenance as stress management. Journal of Applicated Communication Research, 48(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1706097
4.
AfifiT. D.HaughtonC.ParrishC. (2021). Relational load: Implications for executive functioning, mental health, and feelings of unity in romantic relationships. Communication Monographs, 88(4), 506–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.1896015
5.
AfifiT. D.MerrillA. F.DavisS. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159
6.
AfifiT. D.MerollaA. J.AfifiW. A.GonzalesC.SalehuddinA.SalmonJ.WilsonV. (2024). Individuals’ perceptions of reciprocal relationship maintenance in their marriage and its impact on communal orientation, relational load, and ability to flourish. Human Communication Research, 50, 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad056
BaymN. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.
9.
BaxterL. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Sage.
10.
BeanR. C.LedermannT.HigginbothamB. J.GalliherR. V. (2019). Associations between relationship maintenance behaviors and marital stability in remarriages. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 61(1), 82–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2019.1619385
11.
BergerM.KraeuterA. K.RomanikD.MaloufP.AmmingerG. P.SarnyaiZ. (2016). Cortisol awakening response in patients with psychosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.027
12.
BioccaF.HarmsC.BurgoonJ. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
13.
BonevaB.KrautR.FrohlichD. (2001). Using e-mail for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957204
14.
BrenanM. (2020, March5). Working moms get little reprieve from household demands. Gallup. https://bit.ly/3KwroAD
15.
BurkeT. J.RuppelE. K.DinsmoreD. R. (2016). Moving away and reaching out: Young adults’ relational maintenance and psychosocial well-being during the transition to college. Journal of Family Communication, 16(2), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2016.1146724
16.
CanaryD. J.StaffordL. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
17.
CanaryD. J.StaffordL.HauseK. S.WallaceL. A. (1993). An inductive analysis of relationship maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099309359913
18.
CarlsonD. L.MillerA. J.RuddS. (2020). Division of housework, communication, and couples’ relationship satisfaction. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120924805
19.
CaughlinJ. P.SharabiL. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
20.
CaughlinJ. P.WangN. (2020). Relationship maintenance in the age of technology. In OgolskyB. G.MonkJ. K. (Eds.), Relationship maintenance: Theory, process, and context (pp. 304–322). Cambridge University Press.
21.
ChurchillE. E.BlyS. (1999). Virtual environments at work: Ongoing use of MUDs in the workplace. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 24(2), 99–108. https://bit.ly/3Kwu9C5
22.
CodeD. (2011). Kids pick up on everything: How parental stress is toxic to kids. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
DaviesP. T.CummingsE. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.387
25.
DavisS. M.HighA. C. (2017). Widening the gap: Support gaps in same race versus different race female friendship dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517722245
26.
DindiaK.CanaryD. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on relational maintenance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000201
27.
DriverJ. L.GottmanJ. M. (2004). Daily marital interactions and positive affect during marital conflict among newlywed couples. Family Process, 43(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00024.x
28.
DunatchikA.GersonK.GlassJ.JacobsJ. A.StritzelH. (2021). Gender, parenting, and the rise of remote work during the pandemic: Implications for domestic inequality in the United States. Gender & Society, 35(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211001301
29.
EdwardsA. L. (2024). Maintaining long-distance mother–daughter relationships during college via technologically mediated self-disclosure and co-rumination [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara]. eScholarship. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2bx7j41v
30.
FallahchaiR.FallahiM.RandallA. K. (2019). A dyadic approach to understanding associations between job stress, marital quality, and dyadic coping for dual-earning couples in Iran. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00487
31.
FeeneyB. C.LemayE. P. (2012). Surviving relationship threats: The role of emotional capital. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442971
32.
FeeneyJ. A. (2006). Parental attachment and conflict behavior: Implications for offspring’s attachment, loneliness, and relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 13(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00102.x
FriscoM. L.WilliamsK. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and advice in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02238520
35.
GarbeA.OgurluU.LoganN.CookP. (2020). COVID-19 and remote learning: Experiences of parents with children during the pandemic. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 4(3), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/8471
36.
GoldsmithD. J.Domann-ScholzK. (2013). The meanings of “open communication” among couples coping with a cardiac event. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.111/jcom.12021
37.
GrahamJ. E.ChristianL. M.Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K. (2006). Stress, age, and immune function: Toward a lifespan approach. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(4), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9057-4
38.
GunnD. O.GunnC. W (2000, September). The quality of electronically maintained relationships [Conference presentation]. Association of Internet Researchers 2019 Convention.
39.
HaasS. M. (2002). Social support as relationship maintenance in gay male couples coping with HIV or AIDS. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502191005
40.
HallJ. A. (2020). Relating through technology. Cambridge University Press.
HesseC.FloydK.RainsS.MikkelsonA.PauleyP.WooN.CusterB.DuncanK. (2020). Affectionate communication and health: A meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 88(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1805480
44.
HighA. C.CrowleyJ. L. (2016). Gaps among desired, sought, and received support: Deficits and surpluses in support when coping with taboo marital stressors. Communication Research, 45(3), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626975
45.
HilpertP.XuF.MilekA.AtkinsD. C.BodenmannG.BradburyT. N. (2018). Couples coping with stress: Between-person differences and within-person processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000380
46.
HolmstromA. J.ShebibS. J.BoumisJ. K.AllardA.MasonA. J.LimJ. I. (2021). Support gaps during the COVID-19 pandemic: Sex differences and effects on well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(10), 2985–3009. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211041539
47.
HughesM. E.WaiteL. J.HawkleyL.CacioppoJ. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: Results from two population-based studies. Research on Aging, 26(6), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574
48.
JaremkaL.LindgrenM.Kiecolt-GlaserJ. (2013). Synergistic relationships among stress, depression, and troubled relationships: Insights from psychoimmunology. Depression and Anxiety, 30(4), 288e296. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22078
49.
KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Conceptual and methodological issues in the analysis of data from dyads and groups. In DeauxK.SnyderM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 209–238). Oxford University Press.
50.
Keestra-GounderA. M.ByndlossM. X.SeyffertN.YoungB. M.Chávez-ArroyoA.TsaiA. Y.CevallosS. A.WinterM. G.PhamO. H.TiffanyC. R.de JongM. F.KerrinnesT.RavindranR.LuciwP. A.McSorleyS. J.BäumlerA. J.De JongM. F. (2016). NOD1 and NOD2 signaling links ER stress with inflammation. Nature, 532, 394–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17631
51.
KennedyT. L. M.SmithA.WellsA. T.WellmanB. (2008). Networked families. Pew Internet and American Life Project. https://pewrsr.ch/3xdCEhL
52.
KocherS. (2021, September6). Study: The modern American family is more connected than ever. SWNS Digital. https://bit.ly/3uo2MVb
53.
KorzhinaY.HembergJ.Nyman-KurkialaP.FagerströmL. (2022). Causes of involuntary loneliness among adolescents and young adults: An integrative review. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2150088
54.
MalinenK.KinnunenU.TolvanenA.RönkaA.Wierda-BoerH.GerrisJ. (2010). Happy spouses, happy parents? Family relationships among Finnish and Dutch dual earners. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00700.x
55.
MatsunagaM. (2011). Underlying circuits of social support for bullied victims: An appraisal-based perspective on supportive communication and postbullying adjustment. Human Communication Research, 37(2), 174–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01398.x
56.
MazurA. P.AfifiT. D.AfifiW. A.HaughtonC. (2023). The importance of financial hardship and the preventative role of relational maintenance in marriage at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Monographs, 90(4), 522–544. DOI:10.1080/03637751.2023.2235004.
57.
McEwanB. (2021). Modality switching to modality weaving: Updating theoretical perspectives for expanding media affordances. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1880958
58.
McEwanB.HornD. (2016). ILY & can u pick up some milk: Effects of relational maintenance via text messaging on relational satisfaction and closeness in dating partners. Southern Communication Journal, 81(3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2016.1165728
NeaultR. A.PickerellD. A. (2005). Dual-earning couples: The juggling act. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 39(3), 187–198. https://bit.ly/3rfhrA0
61.
OfferS.SchneiderB. (2011). Revesting the gender gap in time-use patterns: Multitasking and well-being among mothers and fathers in dual-earner families. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 809–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411425170
62.
OgolskyB. G.StaffordL. (2023). A systematic review of relationship maintenance: Reflecting back and looking to the future. Personal Relationships, 30(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12429
RaleyS. B.MattinglyM. J.BianchiS. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 11–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600353
65.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
66.
ReisH. T.SheldonK. M.GableS. L.RoscoeJ.RyanR. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266002
67.
RohlederN.AringerM.BoentertM. (2012). Role of interleukin-6 in stress, sleep, and fatigue. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1261(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06634.x
68.
RudiJ.DworkinJ.WalkerS.DotyJ. (2014). Parents’ use of information and communication technologies for family communication: Differences by age of children. Information, Communication & Society, 18(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.934390
69.
SahniS.KaushalL. A.GuptaP. (2025). Gendered differences and strategies for work-life balance: Systematic review based on social ecological framework perspective. Acta Psychologica, 256, Article 105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105019.
70.
SaxbeD.RepettiR. L. (2010). For better or worse? Coregulation of couples’ cortisol levels and mood states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 92e103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016959
ShortC.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
73.
StaffordL. (2011). Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 278–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378125
74.
StaffordL. (2016). Marital sanctity, relationship maintenance, and marital quality. Journal of Family Issues, 37(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13515884
75.
StokesJ. E. (2017). Do “his” and “her” marriages influence one another? Contagion in personal assessments of marital quality among older spouses over a four-year span. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272517701701
76.
TanX.RuppannerL.HewittB.MaumeD. (2022). Restless sleep and emotional wellbeing among European full-time dual-earner couples: Gendered impacts of children and workplace demands. Contemporary Social Science, 17(4), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2022.2033305
77.
TaylorS. E.KleinL. C.LewisB. P.GruenewaldT. L.GurungR. A. R.UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
78.
TongS. T.WaltherJ. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and computer-mediated communication. In WrightK. B.WebbL. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). Peter Lang Publishing.
VicariB.ZochG.BächmannA.-C. (2022). Childcare, work or worries? What explains the decline in parents’ well-being at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany?Journal of Family Research, 29(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-70
82.
WaltherJ. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective: a relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
83.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
84.
WaltherJ. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Sage.
85.
WangN. (2019). Support gaps in parent-emerging adult dyads: The role of support quality. Personal Relationships, 26(2), 232–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12276
86.
WangN.RoacheD. J.PusateriK. B. (2018). Associations between parents’ and young adults’ face-to-face and technology communication competence: The role of family communication patterns. Communication Research, 46(8), 1171–1196. https://doi.org/10.177/0093650217750972
87.
XuY.BurlesonB. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal social support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27(4), 535–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00792.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
