This study contributes to theory in persuasion and humor by hypothesizing distinct audience segments that determine how people respond to humor appeals. Across two studies, using a multiple message design and two different humor appeals, we specify and validate four discrete audience segments, referred to here as audience receptivity profiles, that align with previous theorizing and are differentially related to persuasion. Findings suggest that those with different audience receptivity profiles vary in whether they find humor appeals humorous, resulting in increased perceptions of humor and message-consistent persuasive effects among audiences who belong to supportive audience receptivity profiles, and decreased humor as well as increased likelihood of unintended effects among audiences who belong to non-supportive audience receptivity profiles. These findings align with previous theorizing in this area, and highlight when humor may have deleterious effects on audiences whose attitudes and values suggest they are most open to persuasive attempts.
AbramsJ. R.BippusA. (2011). An intergroup investigation of disparaging humor. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x10397162
2.
AboM. M.SlaterM. D.JainP. (2017). Using health conditions for laughs and health policy support: The case of food allergies. Health Communication, 32(7), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1172292
3.
AkogulS.ErisogluM. (2017). An approach for determining the number of clusters in a model-based cluster analysis. Entropy, 19(9), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19090452
4.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Missing data. In MillsapR. E.Maydeu-OlivaresA. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). Sage.
5.
ArmitageC. J.NormanP.AlganemS.ConnerM. (2015). Expectations are more predictive of behavior than behavioral intentions: Evidence from two prospective studies. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9653-4
6.
BeckerA. B. (2014). Humiliate my enemies or mock my friends? Applying disposition theory of humor to the study of political parody appreciation and attitudes toward candidates. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12022
7.
BellN. D. (2017). Failed humor. In AttardoS. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 356–370). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-25
8.
ByrneS.HartP. S. (2009). The boomerang effect: A synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 33(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2009.11679083
9.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.MorrisK. J. (1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(4), 805.
10.
CannA.ZapataC. L.DavisH. B. (2009). Positive and negative styles of humor in communication: Evidence for the importance of considering both styles. Communication Quarterly, 57(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903313398
11.
CeleuxG.SoromenhoG. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01246098
12.
ChappleA.ZieblandS.McPhersonA. (2004). Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: Qualitative study. BMJ, 328(7454), 1470. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7C
13.
ChoH.BosterF. J. (2005). Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scales. Communication Research, 32(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204273764
14.
CoronelJ. C.O’DonnellM. B.PandeyP.CarpiniM. X. D.FalkE. B. (2021). Political humor, sharing, and remembering: Insights from neuroimaging. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa041
15.
DillardJ. P.TianX.CruzS. M.SmithR. A.ShenL. (2023). Persuasive messages, social norms, and reactance: A study of masking behavior during a COVID-19 campus health campaign. Health Communication, 38(7), 1338–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2007579
FergusonM. A.FordT. E. (2008). Disparagement humor: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 21(3), 283–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor.2008.014
GrahamE. E.PapaM. J.BrooksG. P. (1992). Functions of humor in conversation: Conceptualization and measurement. Western Journal of Communication, 56(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319209374409
GulasC. S.WeinbergerM. G. (2006). Humor in advertising: A comprehensive analysis. M.E. Sharpe.
22.
HackmanM. Z.Barthel-HackmanT. A. (1993). Communication apprehension, willingness to communicate, and sense of humor: United States and New Zealand perspectives. Communication Quarterly, 41(3), 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369889
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
24.
JanesL. M.OlsonJ. M. (2010). Is it you or is it me? Contrasting effects of ridicule targeting other people versus the self. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v6i3.208
25.
JiangT.LiH.HouY. (2019). Cultural differences in humor perception, usage, and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123
26.
JohnnyL.MitchellC. (2006). “Live and let live”: An analysis of HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination in international campaign posters. Journal of Health Communication, 11(8), 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730600934708
JungT.WickramaK. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
30.
KimM.-S.HunterJ. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior. Communication Research, 20(3), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003001
31.
KrosnickJ. A.BoningerD. S.ChuangY. C.BerentM. K.CarnotG. G. (1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132–1151.
32.
KuipersG. (2008). The sociology of humor. In RaskinV.RuchW. (Eds.), The Primer of Humor Research (pp. 361–398). Mouton de Gruyter.
33.
LeeJ. Y.SlaterM. D.TchernevJ. (2015). Self-deprecating humor versus other-deprecating humor in health messages. Journal of Health Communication, 20(10), 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018591
34.
MartinR. A.Puhlik-DorisP.LarsenG.GrayJ.WeirK. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
35.
McLachlanG. J.PeelD. (2000). Finite mixture models. John Wiley & Sons.
36.
Mendiburo-SeguelA.AlendaS.FordT. E.OlahA. R.NaviaP. D.Argüello-GutiérrezC. (2022). #funnypoliticians: How do political figures use humor on Twitter?Frontiers in Sociology, 7, 788742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.788742
MeyerJ. C.VenetteS. J. (2017). Humor in health and risk messaging. Oxford University Press.
39.
Moyer-GuséE.MahoodC.BrookesS. (2011). Entertainment-education in the context of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communication, 26(8), 765–774.
40.
Moyer-GuséE.TchernevJ. M.Walther-MartinW. (2019). The persuasiveness of a humorous environmental narrative combined with an explicit persuasive appeal. Science Communication, 41(4), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019862553
41.
NabiR. L.Moyer-GuséE.ByrneS. (2007). All joking aside: A serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs, 74, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196896
42.
Nylund-GibsonK.ChoiA. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
43.
NylundK. L.AsparouhovT.MuthénB. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
44.
PastorD. A.BarronK. E.MillerB. J.DavisS. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(1), 8–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.003
45.
RamseyM. C.MeyerJ. C. (2019). Exploring communicative functions of humor: The development and assessment of a new functions of humor scale. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 27(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1540417
46.
RosenbergJ. M.van LissaC. J.BeymerP. N.AndersonD. J.SchellM. J.SchmidtJ. A. (2019). tidyLPA: Easily carry out latent profile analysis (LPA) using open-source or commercial software [R package]. https://data-edu.github.io/tidyLPA/
47.
SherifM.HovlandC. I. (1961). Social Judgment. Yale University Press.
48.
SherifC. W.SherifM. (1967). Attitude, ego-involvement, and change. Wiley.
49.
SherifC. W.SherifM.NebergallR. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach (pp. 127–167). Saunders.
50.
SkurkaC.Lee CunninghamJ. J. (2023). Seeing the funny side: Humor in pro-environmental communication. Current Opinion in Psychology, 53, 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101668
51.
SoJ.JeongS. H.HwangY. (2017). Which type of risk information to use for whom? Moderating role of outcome-relevant involvement in the effects of statistical and exemplified risk information on risk perceptions. Journal of Health Communication, 22(4), 304-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.12528
TrunfioM.RossiS. (2021). Conceptualising and measuring social media engagement: A systematic literature review. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2021(3), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-021-00035-8
54.
VaillantG. E. (2012). Adaptation to life. Harvard University Press.
55.
WalterN.CodyM. J.XuL. Z.MurphyS. T. (2018). A priest, a rabbi, and a minister walk into a bar: A meta-analysis of humor effects on persuasion. Human Communication Research, 44(4), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy005
56.
WestburyS.OyebodeO.van RensT.BarberT. M. (2023). Obesity stigma: Causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Current Obesity Reports, 12(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00495-3
57.
WilliamsG. A.KibowskiF. (2016). Latent class analysis and latent profile analysis. In JasonL. A.GlenwickD. S. (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 143–151). Oxford University Press.
58.
WitteK. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328
59.
WitteK.CameronK. A.McKeonJ. K.BerkowitzJ. M. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/108107396127988
60.
YangZ.DealB. E.CarcioppoloN.ZhaoY.SewallA. M. (2024). A content analysis of problematic gambling prevention interventions in the United States. Journal of Gambling Studies, 40(1) 51–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-023-10237-8
61.
YoonG.LiC.JiY.NorthM.HongC.LiuJ. (2018). Attracting comments: Digital engagement metrics on Facebook and financial performance. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405753
62.
ZillmanD. (1983). Disparagement humor. In McGheeP. E.GoldsteinJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of humor research (pp. 85-108). Springer-Verlag.
63.
ZillmannD.CantorJ. R. (2017). A disposition theory of humour and mirth. In ChapmanA. J.FootH. C. (Eds.) Humor and Laughter (pp. 93–115). Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
