Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Revisiting Communication Infrastructure Theory: A Meta-Analytical Approach to Understanding the Influence of Integrated Connectedness to a Neighborhood Storytelling Network
Communication infrastructure theory (CIT) posits that integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network (ICSN), which refers to individuals’ access to community communication resources and opportunities, positively affects civic engagement. We meta-analyzed this relationship with 23 studies (k = 28, N = 17,792) and found that the overall effect of ICSN on civic engagement was moderate (r = .38), with slightly different effect sizes for different types of civic engagement, including neighborhood belonging (r = .42), collective efficacy (r = .28), and civic participation (r = .41). The relationship was largely unaffected by moderators. Among ICSN components, interpersonal neighborhood storytelling was particularly influential in fostering neighborhood belonging and civic participation, while the three components (i.e., interpersonal neighborhood storytelling, local media connectedness, and participation in community organizations) contributed similarly to collective efficacy. We discuss the importance of neighborhood storytelling in fostering civic engagement and offer implications for theoretical advancement and practical applications.
AbrilE. P.KupczykM.ZwickeG. L.MastaroneG. L.IrwinT.DykensA. (2015). Mapping the health communication infrastructure in rural Senegal: An assessment to support cervical cancer screening. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43(2), 242–262.
2.
AlesinaA.DevleeschauwerA.EasterlyW.KurlatS.WacziargR. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024471506938
3.
AndersonL. B. (2020). Exploring the role of communication in the aging in place experience: A quasi-ethnographic account of a local community. Communication Monographs, 87(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1728562
4.
Ball-RokeachS. J. (1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society, 1, 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9676398
5.
Ball-RokeachS. J.KimY. C.MateiS. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 392–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028004003
6.
BaumgartnerF. R.WalkerJ. L. (1988). Survey research and membership in voluntary associations. American Journal of Political Science, 32(4), 908–928. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111194
7.
BergerB. (2009). Political theory, political science, and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(2), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759270909080x
8.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
9.
CarpenterC. J. (2020). Meta-analyzing apples and oranges: How to make applesauce instead of fruit salad. Human Communication Research, 46(2–3), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqz018
10.
CarterE. C.SchönbrodtF. D.GervaisW. M.HilgardJ. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196
11.
CreechD. N.LitvinskyM.MorenoE.EllerbeB.Ball-RokeachS. (2018). The dynamics of communication networks, worry, and sense of belonging in a gentrifying neighborhood: A comparison of newer and more established residents [Paper presentation]. Annual conference of the International Communication Association, Prague, Czech Republic.
12.
DillardJ. P. (1998). Evaluating and using meta-analytic knowledge claims. In AllenM.PreissR. W. (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 257–270). Hampton Press.
13.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
14.
EdelsteinA. S.LarsenO. N. (1960). The weekly press’ contribution to a sense of urban community. Journalism Quarterly, 37(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769906003700401
15.
FischerC. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
FisherW. (1989). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. University of South Carolina Press.
17.
FriedlandL. A.McLeodJ. M. (1999). Community integration and mass media: A reconsideration. In DemersD.ViswanathK. (Eds.), Mass media, social control, and social change: A macrosocial perspective (pp. 197–226). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
18.
FriedlandL. A. (2001). Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the communicatively integrated community. Communication Research, 28(4), 358–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028004002
19.
GrahamS.MarvinS. (2002). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
20.
HabermasJ. (1987). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2: A critique of functionalist reason. (McCarthyT., Trans.) Beacon Press (Original work published 1981).
21.
HabermasJ. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society. (McCarthyT., Trans.) Polity (Original work published 1962).
22.
HansenC.SteinmetzH.BlockJ. (2022). How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: A practical guide. Management Review Quarterly, 72(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00247-4
23.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting for error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Sage.
JungJ. Y.QiuJ. L.KimY. C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the “divide”. Communication Research, 28(4), 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028004006
26.
KimM. S.HunterJ. E.MiyaharaA.HorvathA.BresnahanM.YoonH. (1996). Individual- vs. cultural-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: Effects on preferred conversational styles. Communication Monographs, 63(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376373
KimY. (2024). Quantitative criticalism for social justice and equity-oriented communication research. Human Communication Research, 50(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad048
KimY. C. (2018). Communication infrastructure theory as a theory for collective problem recognition and problem-solving in urban communities: Beliefs, assumptions, and propositions. In KimY. C.MatsaganisM.WilkinH.JungJ. Y. (Eds.), The communication ecology of 21st century urban communities (pp. 50–66). Peter Lang.
KimY. C.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2006b). Community storytelling network, neighborhood context, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Human Communication Research, 32(4), 411–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00282.x
33.
KimY. C.JungJ. Y.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2006). “Geo-ethnicity” and neighborhood engagement: A communication infrastructure perspective. Political Communication, 23(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600976997
34.
KimY. C.KimY.ChaeY. G. (2022). Communication and difference in urban neighborhoods: A communication infrastructure theory perspective. Communication Monographs, 89(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2021.2020864
35.
KimY. C.MoranM. B.WilkinH. A.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2011). Integrated connection to neighborhood storytelling network, education, and chronic disease knowledge among African Americans and Latinos in Los Angeles. Journal of Health Communication, 16(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.54648
36.
KimY. C.ShinE.ChoA.JungE.ShonK.ShimH. (2019). SNS dependency and community engagement in urban neighborhoods: The moderating role of integrated connectedness to a community storytelling network. Communication Research, 46(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215588786
37.
KimY. C.ShinE.KimY.ChaeY. G. (2023). Difference-managing and difference-reducing community storytelling in urban neighborhoods: A communication infrastructure theory perspective. Human Communication Research, 49(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad007
38.
KlinenbergE. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. Broadway.
39.
LeeS.LiuW.NahS. (2023). Advancing communication infrastructure theory: The moderating roles of citizen journalism practice and political trust on online civic participation. Mass Communication and Society, 26(5), 827–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2093750
40.
LightR.PillemerD. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press.
41.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
42.
LittlejohnS. W.FossK. A.OetzelJ. G. (2021). Theories of human communication (12th ed.). Waveland Press.
43.
MateiS.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2001). Real and virtual social ties: Connections in the everyday lives of seven ethnic neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957213
44.
McChesneyR. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. University of Illinois Press.
45.
McLeodJ. M.DailyK.GuoZ.EvelandW. P.BayerJ.YangS.WangH. (1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23(2), 179–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023002002
46.
McLeodJ. M.ScheufeleD. A.MoyP. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659
47.
MoranM. B.FrankL. B.ZhaoN.GonzalezC.ThainiyomP.MurphyS. T.Ball-RokeachS. J. (2016). An argument for ecological research and intervention in health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1128021
48.
NahS.KwonH. K.LiuW.McNealyJ. E. (2021). Communication infrastructure, social media, and civic participation across geographically diverse communities in the United States. Communication Studies, 72(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1876129
49.
NahS.LeeS.LiuW. (2022). Community storytelling network, expressive digital media use, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 49(3), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211019677
50.
NahS.YamamotoM. (2017). Civic technology and community building: Interaction effects between integrated connectedness to a storytelling network (ICSN) and Internet and mobile uses on civic participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(4), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12189
RobinsonD.WilkinsonD. (1995). Sense of community in a remote mining town: Validating a neighborhood cohesion scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02506926
54.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
55.
ShaoC.KwonK. H.NahS. (2022). Civic life in rural America revisited: The role of social and mobile news on civic participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(2), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2086255
56.
SlaterM. D.SnyderL.HayesA. F. (2006). Thinking and modeling at multiple levels: The potential contribution of multilevel modeling to communication theory and research. Human Communication Research, 32(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00292.x
57.
StammK. R. (1985). Newspaper use and community ties: Toward a dynamic theory. Ablex.
58.
StarS. L.BowkerG. C. (2006). How to infrastructure. In LievrouwL. A.LivingstoneS. (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs (pp. 230–245). SAGE.
59.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
60.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
61.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588. https://doi.org/10.1086/229572
62.
WilkinH. A. (2013). Exploring the potential of communication infrastructure theory for informing efforts to reduce health disparities. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12006
63.
WyattR. O.KatzE.KimJ. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02834.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
