This essay proposes that studying the emergence of solidarity through multi-actor supportive communication offers a useful lens for understanding the increasingly complex structures, dynamics, and communal nature of supportive communication in online communities. Drawing on research of social exchange, online community affordance, and social support type, the essay explores the links between multi-actor supportive communication patterns and solidarity experiences in online communities. It develops three propositions that connect four forms of exchange—reciprocal, negotiated, generalized, and productive—to the experiences of solidarity, moderated by affordance and support type as key communication-situational factors. Directions for empirical testing of these propositions are also discussed, along with implications for supportive communication research and the study of online communities.
BalesR. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Addison-Wesley.
2.
BarbeeA. P.CunninghamM. R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Annals of the International Communication Association, 18(1), 381–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1995.11678921
3.
BennettW. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
4.
BioccaF.HarmsC.BurgoonJ. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456–480. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270
5.
BlauP. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
6.
boydd. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
7.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.1.83
8.
BurkeM.KrautR. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12162
9.
BurlesonB. R. (1987). Cognitive complexity and message design: The development of communication skills. In McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 305–349). Sage.
10.
BurlesonB. R. (2010). The nature of interpersonal communication: A message-centered approach. In BergerC. R.RoloffM. E.Roskos-EwoldsenD. R. (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 145–164). Sage.
11.
BurlesonB. R.MacGeorgeE. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In KnappM. L.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374–424). Sage.
12.
BurlesonB. R.SamterW. (1985). Consistencies in theoretical and naive evaluations of comforting messages. Communication Monographs, 52(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758509376099
13.
CappellaJ. N. (1987). Interpersonal communication: Definitions and fundamental questions. In BergerC. R.ChaffeeS. H. (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (pp. 184–238). Sage.
14.
ClarkH. H.BrennanS. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In ResnickL. B.LevineJ. M.TeasleyS. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
17.
CollinsR. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014.
18.
CookK. S.CheshireC.RiceE. R. W.NakagawaS. (2013). Social exchange theory. In DeLamaterJ.WardA. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 61–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_3
19.
CutronaC. E. (1990). Stress and social support—In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.1.3
20.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). John Wiley & Sons.
21.
CutronaC. E.SuhrJ. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019002002
22.
DeAndreaD. C.WaltherJ. B. (2011). Attributions for inconsistencies between online and offline self-presentations. Communication Research, 38(6), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210385340
23.
DennisA. R.FullerR. M.ValacichJ. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
24.
DillardJ. P.AndersonJ. W.KnoblochL. K. (2002). Interpersonal influence. In KnappM.DalyJ. (Eds.), The handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 425–474). Sage.
25.
EkehP. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Harvard University Press.
26.
EmersonR. M. (1972). Social exchange theory, part II. In BergerJ.ZelditchM.AndersonB. (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 58–87). Houghton Mifflin.
EmersonR. M. (1981). Social exchange theory. In RosenbergM.TurnerR. H. (Eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives (pp. 30–65). Basic Books.
29.
EvansS. K.PearceK. E.VitakJ.TreemJ. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
30.
FarajS.AzadB. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In LeonardiP. M.NardiB. A.KallinikosJ. (Eds.), Materiality and organizing (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press.
31.
FararoT.DoreianP. (1998). The theory of solidarity: An agenda of problems. In DoreianP.FararoT. (Eds.), The problem of solidarity: Theories and models (pp. 1–31). Routledge.
FengB.LiS.LiN. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510942
34.
FoxJ.McEwanB. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
FulkJ.FlanaginA. J.KalmanM. E.MongeP. R.RyanT. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00120.x
37.
GodardR.HoltzmanS. (2024). Are active and passive social media use related to mental health, wellbeing, and social support outcomes? A meta-analysis of 141 studies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), zmad055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad055
38.
GoffmanE. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face to face behavior. Anchor Books.
39.
GoldsmithD. J. (2004). Communicating social support. Cambridge University Press.
HanasonoL. K.YangF. (2016). Computer-mediated coping: Exploring the quality of supportive communication in an online discussion forum for individuals who are coping with racial discrimination. Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103292
42.
HanE.KimK. K.LeeA. R. (2019). Contributors to exchange structures and their effects on community solidarity in online communities. Internet Research, 29(6), 1410–1442. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-02-2018-0072
43.
HayesA. F. (Ed.). (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
44.
HechterM. (1988). Principles of group solidarity. University of California Press.
HighA. C.Oeldorf-HirschA.BellurS. (2014). Misery rarely gets company: The influence of emotional bandwidth on supportive communication on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.037
47.
HighA. C.YoungR. (2018). Supportive communication from bystanders of cyberbullying: Indirect effects and interactions between source and message characteristics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46, 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1412085
48.
HoggM. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000040
49.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1988). Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge.
50.
HomansG. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
51.
JangJ.FengB. (2023). The effect of anticipatory apology and appreciation in online support-seeking messages on support provision in the U.S. and Korea. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 42(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x221147274
52.
JonesS. M.BodieG. D. (2014). Supportive communication. In BergerC. R. (Ed.), Interpersonal communication (pp. 371–394). de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110276794.371
KanterR. M. (1972). Commitment and community: Communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Harvard University Press.
55.
KelleyH. H.HolmesJ. G.KerrN. L.ReisH. T.RusbultC. E.Van LangeP. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge University Press.
56.
KollockP. (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In SmithM. A.KollockP. (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 219–237). Routledge.
57.
KuwabaraK. (2011). Cohesion, cooperation, and the value of doing things together: How economic exchange creates relational bonds. American Sociological Review, 76(4), 560–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411414825
58.
LawlerE. J.ThyeS.YoonJ. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 616–657. https://doi.org/10.1086/318965
59.
LawlerE. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1086/324071
60.
LawlerE. J.RidgewayC.MarkovskyB. (1993). Structural social psychology and the micro-macro problem. Sociological Theory, 11(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/201971
LawlerE. J.ThyeS. R.YoonJ. (2009). Social commitments in a depersonalized world. Russell Sage Foundation.
63.
LawlerE. J.YoonJ. (1993). Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58(4), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096071
64.
LawlerE. J.YoonJ. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096408
65.
LeaM.SpearsR.WattS. E. (2007). Visibility and anonymity effects on attraction and group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.398
66.
LiaoW.McComasK. A.Connie YuanY. (2017). The influence of unrestricted information exchange on willingness to share information with outsiders. Human Communication Research, 43(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12104
67.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press.
68.
LiS.FengB.LiN.TanX. (2015). How social context cues in online support-seeking influence self-disclosure in support provision. Communication Quarterly, 63(5), 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1078389
69.
LiS.FengB.WingateV. S. (2019). Give thanks for a little and you will find a lot: The role of a support seeker’s reply in online support provision. Communication Monographs, 86(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1539237
70.
LiuY.HuangW.LuoD. (2022). The reception of support in peer-to-peer online networks: Network position, support solicitation, and support provision in an online asthma caregivers group. Health Informatics Journal, 28(1), 14604582211066020. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582211066020
LuW.HamptonK. N. (2017). Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support. New Media & Society, 19(6), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621514
73.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (Eds.). (2011). Supportive communication. In Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 317–354). Sage.
74.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.GuntzvillerL. M. (2016). Advice: Expanding the communication paradigm. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 213–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735261
75.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
76.
MehrabianA. (1967). Attitudes inferred from non-immediacy of verbal communications. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(2), 294–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(67)80113-0
77.
MeierA.ReineckeL. (2021). Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: A conceptual and empirical meta-review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1182–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220958224
78.
MolmL. D.CollettJ.SchaeferD. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.1086/517900
MolmL. D.CollettJ. L.SchaeferD. R. (2006). Conflict and fairness in social exchange. Social Forces, 84(4), 2331–2352. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0100
MolmL. D.TakahashiN.PetersonG. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1396–1427. https://doi.org/10.1086/210434
83.
MolmL. D.WhithamM. M.MelamedD. (2012). Forms of exchange and integrative bonds: Effects of history and embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411434610
84.
MongeC. K.MatthewsN. L.DeAndreaD. C. (2024). The persistence of toxic online messages influences perceptions of harm and attributions of blame. Journal of Communication, 74(5), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae024
85.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852
86.
NormanD. (1990). The design of everyday things. Doubleday Business.
87.
NowakK. L. (2001). Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation [Conference session]. In Presence 2001 conference (Vol. 2, pp. 686–710).
88.
OhC. S.BailensonJ. N.WelchG. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, article 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
89.
O’SullivanP. B.CarrC. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686104
90.
PanW.FengB.ShenC. (2020). Examining social capital, social support, and language use in an online depression forum: Social network and content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e17365. https://doi.org/10.2196/17365
91.
ParsonsT.BalesR. F. (1955). Family, socialization and interaction: Socialization and interaction process. The Free Press.
92.
PreeceJ. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683
93.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T.LightdaleJ. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 484–493.
94.
RainsS. A. (2019). Communication technology affordances and social support provision. In EgbertN.WrightK. B. (Eds.), Social support and health in the digital age (pp. 29–45). Lexington Books.
95.
RainsS. A.CarterS. N. (2024a). Supportive communication as a collective phenomenon: A dynamic systems account of emotional support provision and outcomes in online health communities. Human Communication Research, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqae019
96.
RainsS. A.CarterS. N. (2024b). The role of support seekers and seeking in supportive communication: A review and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 48, 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2024.2352423
97.
RainsS. A.PetersonE. B.WrightK. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530
98.
RainsS. A.ScottC. R. (2007). To identify or not to identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 17(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00288.x
99.
RainsS. A.WrightK. B. (2016). Social support and computer-mediated communication: A state-of-the-art review and agenda for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 40(1), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2015.11735260
100.
RainsS. A.YoungV. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.x
101.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
102.
RenY.HarperF. M.DrennerS.TerveenL.KieslerS.RiedlJ.KrautR. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703483
103.
RenY.KrautR.KieslerS. (2007). Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 377–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076007
104.
RoloffM. E. (1981). Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach. Sage.
105.
RogersP.LeaM. (2005). Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001723472
106.
RonzhynA.CardenalA. S.Batlle RubioA. (2023). Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media & Society, 25(11), 3165–3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187
SassenbergK.PostmesT. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602760344313
ShortJ.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.
111.
SohnD.LeckenbyJ. D. (2007). A structural solution to communication dilemmas in a virtual community. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 435–449.
112.
SpearsR.LeaM. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427–459.
113.
SpearsR.PostmesT. (2015). Group identity, social influence, and collective action online. In SundarS. S. (Ed.), The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 23–46). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch2
114.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
115.
TanisM.PostmesT. (2008). Cues to identity in online collaboration: Interpersonal or intragroup perceptions in dyadic interactions. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 12(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.2.96
116.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210.
117.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. John Wiley & Sons.
118.
ThoitsP. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161.
119.
ThyeS.LawlerE. J.YoonJ. (2019). The formation of group ties in open interaction groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82(2), 158–181.
120.
TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189.
121.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.
122.
UeharaE. (1990). Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 521–557. https://doi.org/10.1086/229571
123.
ValkenburgP. M.van DrielI. I.BeyensI. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425
124.
van ZoonenW.SivunenA.RiceR. E.TreemJ. W. (2023). Organizational information and communication technologies and their influence on communication visibility and perceived proximity. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(4), 1267–1289.
125.
van ZoonenW.SivunenA. E.TreemJ. W. (2023). Examining the longitudinal relationship between visibility and persistence on stress and technology-assisted supplemental work. Human Communication Research, 49(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac023
126.
WaltherJ. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90.
127.
WaltherJ. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.
128.
WaltherJ. B. (2017). The merger of mass and interpersonal communication via new media: Integrating metaconstructs. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 559–572.
129.
WaltherJ. B.BoydS. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In LinC. A.AtkinD. (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153–188). Hampton Press.
130.
WaltherJ. B.KashianN.JangJ.-W.ShinS. Y.DaiY.KoutamanisM. (2018). The effect of message persistence and disclosure on liking in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychology, 21(2), 308–327.
131.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
132.
WellmanB.GuliaM. (1999). Net-surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In WellmanB. (Ed.), Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 331–366). Westview Press.
133.
WellmanB.WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558–588.
134.
WillerR.FlynnF. J.ZakS. (2012). Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 119–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839212448626
135.
WilsonS. R.AlemanC. G.LeathamG. B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals a revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25, 64–96.
136.
WrongD. (1994). The problem of order. Simon and Schuster.
137.
XueH.LiaoW.ZhangJ. (2024). Interaction dynamics of social support expressions predict future support-seeking behaviors in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108224
138.
YamagishiT.CookK. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786661
139.
YangD.KrautR.LevineJ. M. (2017). Commitment of newcomers and old-timers to online health support communities. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6363–6375). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026008
140.
YoungvorstL. J.HighA. C. (2018). “Anyone free to chat?” Using technological features to elicit quality support online. Communication Monographs, 85(2), 203–223.
