Hintz and Scharp’s explication of the theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement describes how hegemonic ideologies are reified through talk. This paper approaches communicative disenfranchisement from a critical disability studies perspective to make visible the ways systemic ableism operates as a hegemonic ideology that harms disabled individuals. To do so, we employed Price’s theory of crip spacetime to illuminate how communicative disenfranchisement is magnified when the spaces that talk occurs in are disenfranchising themselves. Based on interviews with 20 disabled and chronically ill individuals, findings illustrate how ableism is enacted communicatively through epistemic erasure and spatially through (in)accessible environments. Findings also demonstrate how navigating multiple dimensions of disenfranchisement is costly, negatively affecting individuals’ physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing. This disenfranchisement accumulates and leads to what we term illness burnout, which occurs when structural inaccessibility exhausts individuals from seeking the care they need. To conclude, we provide an illustrative case of crip communicative (dis)enfranchisement, a material-discursive reality that individuals experiencing illness must navigate in pursuit of health care.
BonderR.WincentakJ.GanC.KingsnorthS.ProvvidenzaC. F.McPhersonA. C. (2021). “They assume that you’re not having sex”: A qualitative exploration of how paediatric healthcare providers can have positive sexuality-related conversations with youth with disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 39(3), 579–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-021-09686-z
3.
BontempoA. C. (2023). Patient attitudes toward clinicians’ communication of diagnostic uncertainty and its impact on patient trust. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 3, 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100214
CharmazK. (Ed.). (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
6.
CharonR. (2007). What to do with stories: The sciences of narrative medicine. Canadian Family Physician, 53(8), 1265–1267.
7.
ColebrookC. (2018). Lives worth living: Extinction, persons, disability. In GrusinR. (Ed.), After extinction (pp. 151–171). University of Minnesota Press.
8.
CooperA. (2019). Hear me out. Missouri Medicine, 116(6), 469–471.
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1985). Managing chronic illness at home: Three lines of work. Qualitative Sociology, 8(3), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00989485
DonovanE. E.HazlettA. D. (2024). The labor of communicatively coping: Toward an integrative theory of communication work. Human Communication Research, 50(2), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad049
12.
EpsteinR. M.StreetR. L.Jr. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. Annals of Family Medicine, 9(2), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1239
FrickerM. (Ed.). (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
15.
Gist-MackeyA. N.KingsfordA. N. (2020). Linguistic inclusion: Challenging implicit classed communication bias in interview methods. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(3), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189209341
16.
GramsciA. (1978). Some aspects of the southern question. In HoareQ. (Ed.), Selections from political writings (1921–1926) (pp. 441–462). Lawrence and Wishart.
17.
GunningJ. N.Taladay-CarterC. (2024). Grieving “The death of possibility”: Memorable messages of (dis)enfranchised loss in invisible, physical illness. Health Communication, 39(10), 2152–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2257942
18.
HeritageJ.RobinsonJ. D. (2006). Accounting for the visit: Giving reasons for seeking medical care. In HeritageJ.MaynardD. W. (Eds.), Communication in medical care (pp. 48–85). Cambridge University Press.
19.
HintzE. A. (2023). “It’s all in your head”: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research about disenfranchising talk experienced by female patients with chronic overlapping pain conditions. Health Communication, 38(11), 2501–2515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2081046
20.
HintzE. A.ScharpK. M. (2024). Theory of communicative (dis)enfranchisement: Introduction, explication, and application. Journal of Communication, 74(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae002
21.
HintzE. A.TuckerR. V. (2023). Contesting illness: Communicative (dis)enfranchisement in patient–provider conversations about chronic overlapping pain conditions. Human Communication Research, 49(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad004
22.
HintzE. A.TuckerR. V.WilsonS. R. (2024). Developing measures for and testing the theory of communicative disenfranchisement (TCD) in the context of chronic pain. Health Communication, 39(12), 2510–2523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2275916
HoA. (2011). Trusting experts and epistemic humility in disability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 4(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.4.2.102
25.
HughesB. (2012). Civilising modernity and the ontological invalidation of disabled people. In GoodleyD.HughesB.DavisL. (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 17–32). Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
JarmanM. (2012). Dismembering the lynch mob: Intersecting narratives of disability, race, and sexual menace. In McRuerR.MollowA. (Eds.), Sex and disability (pp. 89–107). Duke University Press.
27.
KaferA. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
28.
KaundinyaT.SchrothS. (2022). Dismantle ableism, accept disability: Making the case for anti-ableism in medical education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 9, 23821205221076660. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221076660
29.
KimJ. B. (2017). Toward a crip-of-color critique: Thinking with Minich’s “enabling whom?” Lateral, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.25158/l6.1.14
30.
KimJ. B.SchalkS. (2021). Reclaiming the radical politics of self-care: A crip-of-color critique. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8916074
31.
KonradA. M. (2021). Access fatigue: The rhetorical work of disability in everyday life. College English, 83(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce202131093
32.
LeeC. (2022). Cripping the medical humanities: Disability, ableism, and access intimacy. Consortium, 2(2), 44–60.
McRuerR. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.
35.
MilotaM. M.van ThielG. J. M. W.van DeldenJ. J. M. (2019). Narrative medicine as a medical education tool: A systematic review. Medical Teacher, 41(7), 802–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2019.1584274
36.
NettletonS. (2006). ‘I just want permission to be ill’: Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Social Science & Medicine, 62(5), 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.030
37.
Peña-GuzmánD. M.ReynoldsJ. M. (2019). The harm of ableism: Medical error and epistemic injustice. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 29(3), 205–242. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2019.0023
38.
Piepzna-SamarasinhaL. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
39.
PieriM. (2023). LGBTQ+ people with chronic illness: Chroniqueers in southern europe. Springer International Publishing.
40.
PriceM. (2011). Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. University of Michigan Press.
SabadaS. (2021). Troubling cure and cripping futurity: Queering narratives of diabetes. In FrazerB. C.WalkerH. R. (Eds.), (Un)doing diabetes: Representation, disability, culture (pp. 319–335). Springer International Publishing.
45.
SchalkS.KimJ. B. (2020). Integrating race, transforming feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 46(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/709213
46.
Serrato CaleroM. D. L. M.Delgado-VázquezÁ. M.Díaz JiménezR. M. (2021). Systematized review and meta-synthesis of the sterilization of women with disabilities in the field of social science: From macroeugenics to microeugenics. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18(3), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00488-0
SteeleL.GoldblattB. (2020). The human rights of women and girls with disabilities: Sterilization and other coercive responses to menstruation. In BobelC.WinklerI. T.FahsB.HassonK. A.KisslingE. A.RobertsT. A. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 77–91). Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK565613/
50.
ThompsonC. M.BabuS.MakosS. (2023a). A grounded theory of credibility work and illness: Explication and application to the case of women on trial in health care. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231184318
51.
ThompsonC. M.BabuS.MakosS. (2023b). Women’s experiences of health-related communicative disenfranchisement. Health Communication, 38(14), 3135–3146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2137772
52.
TracyS. J. (Ed.). (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
