This study utilizes relational turbulence theory to explore how conditions of relational turbulence are associated with relationship maintenance behaviors as a form of relationship functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. A sample of 151 dyads (302 individuals) completed four weekly online surveys between March and June 2020. Data were analyzed using multi-level modeling to examine actor and partner effects and over-time effects. Results revealed associations between relational uncertainty, interdependence, negative emotions, stress, and relational turbulence for both actors and partners. In addition, actors’ perceived relational turbulence was negatively associated with relationship maintenance behaviors. Finally, actors’ relationship maintenance behaviors in one week were positively associated with improved relationship qualities in the following week across all models, and partners’ maintenance behaviors predicted actors’ subsequent perceptions of interference and facilitation. The findings are discussed in terms of theoretical implications for relational turbulence theory and practical implications for helping romantic partners navigate challenging transitions.
AfifiW. A.AfifiT. D. (2021). Uncertainty and coping during COVID-19. In: LewisM.GovenderE.HollandK (Eds.), Communicating COVID-19 (pp. 325–344). Palgrave Macmillian. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79735-5_16
2.
AfifiT. D.HarrisonK.ZamanzadehN.CallejasM. A. (2020). Testing the theory of resilience and relational load in dual career families: Relationship maintenance as stress management. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1706097
3.
AfifiT. D.MerrillA. F.DavisS. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159
4.
AfifiT. D.MerollaA. J.AfifiW. A.GonzalesC.SalehuddinA.SalmonJ.WilsonV. (2024). Individuals’ perceptions of reciprocal relationship maintenance in their marriage and its impact on communal orientation, relational load, and ability to flourish. Human Communication Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad056
5.
BevanJ. L.MurphyM. K.LannuttiP. J.SlatcherR. B.BalzariniR. N. (2023). A descriptive literature review of early research on COVID-19 and close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(1), 201–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221115387
6.
BlalockJ.Bartle-HaringS. (2022). Transition into marriage. A test of relational uncertainty, turbulence, dyadic synchrony, and cohabitation in newlyweds. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 74(4), 1637–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12686
7.
BolkanS.GoodboyA. K.ShinM.QuaackK. R. (2023). Relational turbulence: A latent model test of theoretical propositions. Southern Communication Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2023.2167108
8.
BrisiniK. S. C.SolomonD. H. (2019). Relational turbulence and marital communication when children with Autism start school: A longitudinal dyadic diary study.Health Communication,35(4), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1567445
9.
BrisiniK. S. C.SolomonD. H. (2021). Distinguishing relational turbulence, marital satisfaction, and parenting stress as predictors of ineffective arguing among parents of children with autism. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520958197
10.
BrisiniK. S. C.SolomonD. H. (2023). A repeated-measures study of relational turbulence and transition processing communication during the summer of COVID-19 (Summer 2020). Communication Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221146852
11.
BrisiniK. S. C.SolomonD. H.BrinbergM.(2023). Linking stress to the emergence of relational turbulence in marriage.Personal Relationships, 30(4), 1383–1404.https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12515
12.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications
13.
CanaryD.DaintonM. (2006). Maintaining relationships. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 727–744). Cambridge University Press.
14.
CanaryD.StaffordL. (1992). Relationship maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376268
15.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
16.
DaintonM.GoodboyA. K.BorzeaD.GoldmanZ. W. (2017). The dyadic effects of relationship uncertainty on negative relational maintenance.Communication Reports, 30(3), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1282529
17.
DillardJ. P.KinneyT.A.CruzM. G. (1996). Influence, appraisals, and emotions in close relationships. Communication Monographs, 63(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376382
18.
DindiaK.CanaryD. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000201
19.
EstleinR.Segel-KarpasD.Elran-BarakR. (2022). Relational uncertainty, interdependence and psychological distress during COVID-19: A longitudinal study. Stress & Health, 38(5), 1029-1044. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3155
20.
GoodboyA. K.DillowM. R.KnosterK. C.HowardH. A. (2021). Relational turbulence from the COVID-19 pandemic: Within-subjects mediation by romantic partner interdependence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211000135
21.
GoodboyA. K.DillowM. R.KnosterK. C.HowardH. A. (2023). Dyadic processes of relational turbulence theory. Personal Relationships, 30(3), 1000–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12487
22.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E. (2010). Conflicts of interest: Relational self-construal and decision making in interpersonal contexts.Self and Identity, 10(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298861003684390
23.
HarristA. W.WaughR. M. (2002). Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children’s development. Developmental Review, 22(4), 555–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00500-2
24.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd. ed.). Guilford.
25.
KnoblochL. K. (2007). Perceptions of turmoil within courtship: Associations with intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507077227
26.
KnoblochL. K.MillerL. E.CarpenterK. E. (2007). Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00143.x
27.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499
28.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (2004). Interference and facilitation from partners in the development of interdependence within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships11(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00074.x
29.
KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A. (2010). An actor-partner interdependence model of relational turbulence: Cognitions and emotions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(5), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510368967
30.
KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A. (2011). Relational uncertainty and relationship talk within courtship: A longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model. Communication Monographs, 78(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.542471
31.
KnosterK.HowardH. A.GoodboyA. K.DillowM. R. (2020). Spousal interference and relational turbulence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Research Reports, 37(5), 254-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1841621
32.
LeighJ. K.PenaL. D.AnurudranA.PaiA. (2023). “Are you safe to talk?”: Perspectives of service providers on experiences of domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00359-9
33.
MazurA. P.AfifiT. D.AfifiW. A.HaughtonC. N. (2023). The importance of relationship maintenance in marriage at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication Monographs, 90(4), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2023.2235004
34.
McAninchK. G.BasingerE. D.DelaneyA. L.WehrmanE. C. (2023). Integrating relational turbulence theory and the theory of resilience and relational load to investigate the relationships of couples with chronic illness. Communication Quarterly, 71(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2022.2100267
35.
McLarenR. M.SolomonD. H.PriemJ. S. (2012). The effect of relationship characteristics and relational communication on experiences of hurt from romantic partners. Journal of Communication, 62(6), 950–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01678.x
36.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2007), Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 594–607.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00394.x
37.
OgolskyB. G.BowersJ. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 217–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512463338
38.
OgolskyB. G.MonkJ. K.RiceT. M.TheisenJ. C.ManiotesC. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205
39.
OverallN. C.ChangV. T.PietromonacoP. R.LowR. S. T.HendersonA. M. E. (2020). Partners’ attachment insecurity and stress predict poorer relationship functioning during COVID-19 quarantines. Social Psychology & Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7cvdm
PietromonacoP. R.OverallN. C. (2021). Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples’ relationships.American Psychologist, 76(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000714
42.
PriemJ. S.SolomonD. H. (2011). Relational uncertainty and cortisol responses to hurtful and supportive messages from a dating partner. Personal Relationships, 18(2), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01353.x
43.
SalernoJ. P.DoanL.SayerL. C.DrotningK. J.RinderknechtR. G.FishJ. N. (2021). Changes in mental health and well-being are associated with living arrangements with parents during COVID-19 among sexual minority young persons in the U.S. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000520
44.
SelyeH. (1950). Stress. Acta.
45.
SolomonD. H.BrisiniK. S. (2017). Operationalizing relational turbulence theory: Measurement and construct validation. Personal Relationships, 24(4), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12212
46.
SolomonD. H.BrisiniK. S. C. (2019). Relational uncertainty and interdependence processes in marriage: A test of relational turbulence theory. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(8), 2416–2436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518788700
47.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K. (2001). Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18(6), 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501186004
48.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(6), 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838
49.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A.McLarenR. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation and subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/here.12091
50.
SolomonD. H.TheissJ. A. (2011). Relational turbulence: What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger. In CupachW.SpitzbergB. (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (pp.197–216). Routledge
51.
StaffordL.DaintonM.HassS. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics, Communication Monographs, 67(3), 306–323, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376512
52.
TheissJ. A. (2020). Uncertainty perspectives on relationship maintenance. In OgolskyB. G.MonkJ. K. (Eds.), Relationship maintenance: Theory, process, and context. Cambridge University Press.
53.
TheissJ. A.KnoblochL. K. (2009). An actor-partner interdependence model of irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 36(4), 510–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333033
54.
TheissJ. A.KnoblochL. K. (2014). Relational turbulence and the post-deployment transition: Self, partner, and relationship-focused uncertainty. Communication Research, 41(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211429285
55.
TheissJ. A.KnoblochL. K.ChectonM. G.Magsamen-ConradK. (2009). Relationship characteristics associated with the experience of hurt in romantic relationships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Human Communication Research, 35(4), 588–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.01364.x
56.
TheissJ. A.SolomonD. H. (2006). A relational turbulence model of communication about irritations in romantic relationships. Communication Research, 33(5), 391, 418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206291482
57.
TheissJ. A.WeberK. M. (2016). Antecedents and outcomes of relationship maintenance behaviors during the transition to parenthood. Paper Presented at the Meeting of the National Communication Association, Philadelphia, PA.
58.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
59.
VowelsL. M.Francois-WalcottR. R. R.PerksR. E.CarnellyK. B. (2021). “Be free together rather than confined together”: A qualitative exploration of how relationships changed in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(10), 2921–2943. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211041412
60.
WeigelD. J.Ballard-ReischD. S. (2001). The impact of relational maintenance behaviors on marital satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Communication, 1(4), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0104_03
61.
WeigelD. J.ShroutM. R.(2020). Relational turbulence and health-compromising behaviors: Integrating relational turbulence and stress theories.Personal Relationships, 27(4), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12347
62.
WorleyT. R.Mucci-FerrisM. (2021). Parent-student relational turbulence, support processes, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(10), 3010–3032. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211041658
