Using relational turbulence theory, this study examined the conditional direct and indirect associations between parent involvement (i.e., facilitation and interference) in emerging adults’ romantic relationships and relational turbulence in the parent-child relationship vis-à-vis the valence of conversations with parents about the romantic partner. Participants included 264 emerging adult children who were involved in a romantic relationship. Parent interference with the romantic partnership was directly and indirectly associated with turbulence in the parent-child relationship via communication valence. The direct association was conditioned by the family’s conversation orientation and whether the adult child valued the parent’s opinion about their romantic partnership, whereas the indirect association was not. Likewise, parent facilitation was directly and indirectly associated with turbulence via communication valence, though again only the direct association was conditioned by conversation orientation and valuing the parent’s opinion. Implications for relational turbulence theory are discussed.
AquilinoW. (1997). From adolescent to young adult: A prospective study of parent-child relations during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 670–686. https://doi.org/10.2307/353953
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
5.
BrisiniK. S.SolomonD. H. (2022). Relational turbulence and social network engagement during the summer of COVID-19: A repeated measures, dyadic analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(8), 2435–2453. https://doi-org.ezproxy.tcu.edu/10.1177/02654075221080760
6.
BuunkA. P.ParkJ. H.DubbsS. L. (2008). Parent-offspring conflict in mate preferences. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.47
7.
CongerR. D.CuiM.BryantC. M.Elder Jr.G. H. (2000). Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.2.224
8.
CrockettL. J.RandallB. A. (2006). Linking adolescent family and peer relationships to the quality of young adult romantic relationships: The mediating role of conflict tactics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506068262
9.
CuiM.FinchamF. D. (2010). The differential effects of parental divorce and marital conflict on young adult romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 17(3), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6811.2020.01279.x
10.
DeAndreaD. C.HolbertR. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
11.
DeckerH.SchrodtP. (2022). A communication and identity process that mediates parents’ nonaccommodation and sexual minorities’ mental well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(12), 3535–3557. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221101902
12.
DesmondS. A.MorganK. H.KikuchiG. (2010). Religious development: How (and why) does religiosity change from adolescence to adulthood?Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 247–220. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.247
13.
EinavM. (2014). Perceptions about parents’ relationship and parenting quality, attachment styles, and young adults’ intimate expectations: A cluster analytic approach. The Journal of Psychology, 148(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2013.805116
14.
GoldsmithD. J.McDermottV. M.AlexanderS. C. (2000). Helpful, supportive, and sensitive: Measuring the evaluation of enacted social support in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500173004
15.
GoodboyA. K.BolkanS.SharabiL. L.MyersS.A.BakerJ. P. (2020). The relational turbulence model: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 26(2/3), 222–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa002
16.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford.
17.
HaysA.MettsS. (2015). Support, closeness, and influence tactics as predictors of acceptance of unsolicited parental advice regarding a romantic relationship during emerging adulthood. Ohio Communication Journal, 53, 62–69.
18.
HolbertR. L.ParkE. (2020). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtz006
19.
JamisonT. B.LoH. Y. (2021). Exploring parents’ ongoing role in romantic development: Insights from young adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520958475
20.
KanM. L.McHaleS. M.CrouterA. C. (2008). Parental involvement in adolescent romantic relationships: Patterns and correlates. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(2), 168–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9185-3
21.
KnoblochL. K.MillerL. E.CarpenterK. E. (2007). Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00143.x
22.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50(4), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499
23.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (2004). Interference and facilitation from partners in the development of interdependence within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838
24.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H.TheissJ. A.McLarenR. M. (2018). Relational turbulence theory. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. S.FloydK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 255–266). Routledge.
25.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H.TheissJ. A.McLarenR. M. (2022). Relational turbulence theory: Interpersonal communication during times of transition. In BraithwaiteD. O.SchrodtP. (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 366–378). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195511-32
26.
KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A. (2011). Relational uncertainty and relationship talk within courtship: A longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model. Communication Monographs, 78(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.542471
27.
KoernerA. F.SchrodtP. (2014). An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.857328
28.
KoernerA. F.SchrodtP.FitzpatrickM. A. (2018). Family communication patterns theory: A grand theory of family communication. In BraithwaiteD. O.SuterE. A.Floyd’sK. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 142 – 153). Routledge.
29.
McLarenR. M.SolomonD. H.PriemJ. S. (2012). The effect of relational characteristics and relational communication on experiences of hurt from romantic partners. Journal of Communication, 62(6), 950–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01678.x
30.
MilkieM. A.BiermanA.SchiemanS. (2008). How adult children influence older parents’ mental health: Integrating stress-process and life-course perspectives. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250807100109
31.
QuaackK. R.BolkanS.GoodboyA. K. (2022). Interdependence and affective processes in relational turbulence theory. Communication Reports, 35(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2022.2080843
32.
RitchieL. D. (1991). Family communication patterns: An epistemic analysis and conceptual reinterpretation. Communication Research, 18(4), 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018004005
33.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
34.
ScheinfeldE.WorleyT. (2018). Understanding the parent-child relationship during the transition into college and emerging adulthood using the relational turbulence theory. Communication Quarterly, 66(4), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2018.1443954
35.
SchrodtP.LedbetterA. M.JernbergK. A.LarsonL.ElledgeN.GlonekK. (2009). Family communication patterns as mediators of communication competence in the parent-child relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(6-7), 853–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509345649
36.
SchrodtP.WittP. L.MessersmithA. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802256318
37.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K.TheissJ.McLarenR. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091
38.
SolomonD. H.TheissJ. A. (2008). A longitudinal test of the relational turbulence model of romantic relationship development. Personal Relationships, 15(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00202.x
39.
SolomonD. H.TheissJ. A. (2011). Relational turbulence: What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger. In CupachW. R.SpitzbergB. H. (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships II (pp. 197–216). Routledge.
40.
SolomonD. H.TheissJ. A.KnoblochL. K.McLarenR. M. (2019). Reflections on the development of relational turbulence theory. In WilsonS. R.SmithS. W. (Eds.), Reflections on interpersonal communication research (pp. 315–335). Cognella.
41.
StagerE.SchrodtP. (2024). Relational uncertainty, parent interference, and conversations about the state of the relationship as predictors of relational turbulence in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2023.2291193
42.
SteuberK. R.SolomonD. H. (2011). Factors that predict married partners’ disclosures about infertility to social network members. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2011.585401
43.
TheissJ. A. (2018). The experience and expression of uncertainty close relationships. Cambridge University Press.
44.
WorleyT. R.Mucci-FerrisM. (2021). Parent–student relational turbulence, support processes, and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(10), 3010–3032. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211041658
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
