Eudaimonic media experiences are vast. A comprehensive theoretical model of inward- and outward-focused eudaimonic media outcomes, that can explain how they come about and how they can be discriminated, is still missing. The current manuscript introduces the Transcendent Media Experiences Model (TMEM) to categorize eudaimonic content and experiences as they pertain to healthy self-focus or outward-focused (transcendent) responses and outcomes using self-construal theory as a backbone. This model allows for a more cohesive understanding of when, how, and for whom inward- or outward focused eudaimonic media experiences develop and the mechanisms for why they do so. As such, the model provides a framework for future research directions to systematically address the challenges of predicting, describing, and measuring eudaimonic media experiences and effects.
AhnD.ShinD. H. (2015). Differential effect of excitement versus contentment, and excitement versus relaxation: Examining the influence of positive affects on adoption of new technology with a Korean sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.072
2.
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: The “other-praising” emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650519
3.
BartschA.HartmannT. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565921
BartschA.OliverM. B.NitschC.ScherrS. (2018). Inspired by the Paralympics: Effects of empathy on audience interest in para-sports and on the destigmatization of persons with disabilities. Communication Research, 45(4), 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215626984
6.
BartschA.SchneiderF. M. (2014). Entertainment and politics revisited: How non-escapist forms of entertainment can stimulate political interest and information seeking. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12095
7.
BatchoK. I.DaRinM. L.NaveA. M.YaworskyR. R. (2008). Nostalgia and identity in song lyrics. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 2(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.4.236
8.
BaumeisterR. F. (1998). The self. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). McGraw-Hill.
9.
ClaytonR. B.RaneyA. A.OliverM. B.NeumannD.Janicke-BowlesS. H.DaleK. R. (2021). Feeling transcendent?: Measuring psychophysiological responses to self-transcendent media content. Media Psychology, 24(3), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1700135
10.
ColzatoL. S.de BruijnE. R.HommelB. (2012). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 341. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00341
11.
DaleK. R.RaneyA. A.JanickeS. H.SandersM. S.OliverM. B. (2017a). Youtube for good: A content analysis and examination of elicitors of self-transcendent media. Journal of Communication, 67(6), 897–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12333
12.
DaleK. R.RaneyA. A.JanickeS. H.BaldwinJ.RowlettJ.WangC.ZhaoD. (2017b, November). Narratives and self-transcendent emotions: A content analysis of inspirational movies and television shows. Presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Dallas, TX.
13.
DaleK. R.RaneyA. A.JiQ.Janicke-BowlesS. H.BaldwinJ.RowlettJ. T.WangC.OliverM. B. (2020). Self-transcendent emotions and social media: Exploring the content and consumers of inspirational Facebook posts. New Media & Society, 22(3), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865720
14.
DambrunM.RicardM. (2011). Self-centeredness and selflessness: A theory of self-based psychological functioning and its consequences for happiness. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023059
15.
DeCiccoT. L.StroinkM. L. (2007). A third model of self-construal: The metapersonal self. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 26(1), 82–140. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2007.26.1
16.
EdenA.JohnsonB. K.HartmannT. (2018). Entertainment as a creature comfort: Self-control and selection of challenging media. Media Psychology, 21(3), 352–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1345640
17.
ErikssonM. (2016). The sense of coherence in the salutogenic model of health. In MittelmarkM. B.SagyS.ErikssonM.BauerG. F.PelikanJ.LindströmB.EspnesG. (Eds.), The Handbook of Salutogenesis (pp. 91–96). Springer.
18.
FitzgeraldK.GreenM. C.ParavatiE. (2020). Restorative narratives: Using narrative trajectory for prosocial outcomes. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 4(2), 51–51. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v4.i2.p51
19.
FitzgeraldK.ParavatiE.GreenM. C.MooreM. M.QianJ. L. (2020). Restorative narratives for health promotion. Health Communication, 35(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1563032
20.
FrischlichL.RiegerD.HahnL. (2021). The good, the bad and the ugly: Inspirational media between meaning, narration and manipulation. Special issue in Media and Communication, 9(2), 162–249.
21.
GomezR.FisherJ. W. (2003). Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the spiritual well-being questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(8), 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00045-x
22.
GreenJ. D.SedikidesC.SaltzbergJ. A.WoodJ. V.ForzanoL. A. (2003). Happy mood decreases self-focused attention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(Pt 1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603763276171
23.
GriskeviciusV.ShiotaM. N.NeufeldS. L. (2010). Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: A functional evolutionary approach. Emotion, 10(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018421
24.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2013). On knowing more than we can tell: Intuitive processes and the experience of meaning. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830758
25.
HepperE. G.RitchieT. D.SedikidesC.WildschutT. (2012). Odyssey’s end: Lay conceptions of nostalgia reflect its original Homeric meaning. Emotion, 12(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025167
26.
Janicke-BowlesS. H. (2020). Self-centeredness as a response to narratives with few self-transcendent elicitors. Communication Research Reports, 37(4), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2020.1789579
27.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.JenkinsB.O’NeillB.ThomasonL.PsomasE. (2024). Other-focus versus self-focus: The power of self-transcendent TV shows. Psychology of Popular Media, 13(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000441
28.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.RaneyA. A.OliverM. B.DaleK. R.JonesR. P.CoxD. (2021). Exploring the spirit in U.S. audiences: The role of the virtue of transcendence in inspiring media consumption. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019894927
29.
Janicke-BowlesS. H.SchubertT.BlomsterJ. K. (2021). Kama muta as an eudaimonic entertainment experience. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 403–418). Oxford University Press.
30.
JanickeS. H.OliverM. B. (2017). The relationship between elevation, connectedness, and compassionate love in meaningful films. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 6(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000105
31.
JanickeS. H.RamasubramanianS. (2017). Spiritual Media Experiences, Trait Transcendence, and Enjoyment of Popular Films. Journal of Media and Religion, 16(2), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2017.1311122
32.
KaufmanS. B.JaukE. (2020). Healthy selfishness and pathological altruism: Measuring two paradoxical forms of selfishness. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01006
33.
KellyG. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 & 2). Norton.
34.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
35.
KlimmtC.RiegerD. (2021). Biographic resonance theory of eudaimonic media entertainment. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 383–402). Oxford University Press.
36.
Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2006). Mood management: Theory, evidence, and advancements. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), The psychology of entertainment (pp. 239–254). Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Knobloch-WesterwickS. (2015). The selective exposure self- and affect-management (SESAM)model: Applications in the realms of race, politics, and health. Communication Research, 42(7), 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214539173
38.
Koltko-RiveraM. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10(4), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.10.4.302
39.
KrämerN.EimlerS. C.NeubaumG.WinterS.RösnerL.OliverM. B. (2017). Broadcasting one world: How watching online videos can elicit elevation and reduce stereotypes. New Media & Society, 19(9), 1349–1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816639963
40.
LandmannH.CovaF.HessU. (2019). Being moved by meaningfulness: Appraisals of surpassing internal standards elicit being moved by relationships and achievements. Cognition & Emotion, 33(7), 1387–1409. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1567463
41.
LechelerS.SchuckA. R. T.de VreeseC. H. (2013). Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications - The European Journal of Communication Research, 38(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0011
42.
LewisR. J.TamboriniR.WeberR. (2014). Testing a dual-process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12101
43.
LiP. F. J.WongY. J.GrandersonR. M.JacksonD. (2022). Comprehension, purpose, and mattering? A latent profile analysis of laypeople’s beliefs about meaning in life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(6), 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1991445
44.
MaraC. A.DeCiccoT. L.StroinkM. L. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among self-construal, emotional intelligence, and well-being. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 29(1), 1–11.
45.
MaresM.-L.BartschA.BonusJ. A. (2016). When meaning matters more: Media preferences across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 31(5), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000098
46.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.2.224
47.
OliverM. B.BartschA. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment. The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000029
48.
OliverM. B.HartmannT. (2010). Exploring the role of meaningful experiences in users’ appreciation of good movies. Projections, 4(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2010.040208
49.
OliverM. B.HartmannT.WoolleyJ. K. (2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research, 38(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x
50.
OliverM. B.KimK.HoeweJ.ChungM. Y.AshE.WoolleyJ. K.ShadeD. D. (2015). Media-induced elevation as a means of enhancing feelings of intergroup connectedness. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12099
51.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
52.
OliverM. B.RaneyA. A.SlaterM. D.AppelM.HartmannT.BartschA.SchneiderF. M.Janicke-BowlesS. H.KrämerN.MaresM. L.VordererP.RiegerD.DaleK. R.DasE. (2018). Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx020
53.
OttJ. M.TanN. Q. P.SlaterM. D. (2021). Eudaimonic media in lived experience: Retrospective responses to eudaimonic vs. non-eudaimonic films. Mass Communication & Society, 24(5), 725–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1912774
54.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press and American Psychological Association.
55.
PizarroJ. J.BasabeN.FernándezI.CarreraP.ApodacaP.Man GingC. I.CusiO.PáezD. (2021). Self-transcendent emotions and their social effects: Awe, elevation and kama muta promote a human identification and motivations to help others. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 709859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.709859
56.
PosslerD. (2021). Faszinierende Unterhaltung. Die Entstehung und unterhaltsame Qualität der Emotion Awe (Ehrfurcht) bei der Medienrezeption am Beispiel von Videospielen. Dissertation. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-34764-2
57.
PosslerD.RaneyA. A. (2022, May). Making sense and sense making: Extending dual-process models of entertainment to account for self-transcendent experiences. To be presented at the International Communication Association, Paris, France.
58.
PrestinA. (2013). The pursuit of hopefulness: Operationalizing hope in entertainment media narratives. Media Psychology, 16(3), 318–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.773494
59.
PrestinA.NabiR. (2020). Media prescriptions: Exploring the therapeutic effects of entertainment media on stress relief, illness symptoms, and goal attainment. Journal of Communication, 70(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa001
60.
RayE. C.ArpanL.OehmeK.PerkoA.ClarkJ. (2019). Testing restorative narratives in a college student resilience project. Innovative Higher Education, 44(4), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9464-4
61.
ReineckeL.RiegerD. (2021). Media entertainment as a self-regulatory resource: The recovery and resilience in entertaining media use (R²EM) model. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 755–779). Oxford University Press.
62.
RiegerD.FrischlichL.HögdenF.KaufR.SchrammK.TappeE. (2015). Appreciation in the face of death: Meaningful films buffer against death-related anxiety. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12152
63.
RiegerD.HoferM. (2017). How movies can ease the fear of death: The survival or death of the protagonists in meaningful movies. Mass Communication & Society, 20(5), 710–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1300666
64.
RiegerD.KlimmtC. (2019). The daily dose of digital inspiration 2: Themes and affective user responses to meaningful memes in social media. New Media & Society, 21(10), 2201–2221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819842875
65.
RuddM.VohsK. D.AakerJ. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130–1136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612438731
66.
SchachterS.SingerJ. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046234
SlaterM. D.EwoldsenD. R.WoodsK. W. (2018). Extending conceptualization and measurement of narrative engagement after-the-fact: Parasocial relationship and retrospective imaginative involvement. Media Psychology, 21(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1328313
69.
SlaterM. D.OliverM. B.AppelM. (2019). Poignancy and mediated wisdom of experience: Narrative impacts on willingness to accept delayed rewards. Communication Research, 46(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623838
70.
StellarJ. E.GordonA. M.PiffP. K.CordaroD.AndersonC. L.BaiY.KeltnerD. (2017). Self-transcendent emotions and their social functions: Compassion, gratitude, and awe bind us to others through prosociality. Emotion Review, 9(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916684557
71.
SuhE. M.DienerE.UpdegraffJ. A. (2008). From culture to priming conditions: Self-construal influences on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 3–15.
72.
Tsay-VogelM.KrakowiakK. M. (2016). Inspirational reality TV: The prosocial effects of lifestyle transforming reality programs on elevation and altruism. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1234474
73.
Van CappellenP.SaroglouV. (2012). Awe activates religious and spiritual feelings and behavioral intentions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025986
74.
Van CappellenP.SaroglouV.IweinsC.PiovesanaM.FredricksonB. L. (2013). Self-transcendent positive emotions increase spirituality through basic world assumptions. Cognition & Emotion, 27(8), 1378–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.787395
VordererP. (2021). Entertainment and resonance. In VordererP.KlimmtC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 122–137). Oxford University Press.
77.
WirthW.HoferM.SchrammH. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38(4), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01434.x
78.
WoodJ. V.SaltzbergJ. A.NealeJ. M.StoneA. A.RachmielT. B. (1990). Self-focused attention, coping responses, and distressed mood in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1027
79.
WulfT.RiegerD.SchmittJ. B. (2018). Blissed by the past: Theorizing media-induced nostalgia as an audience response factor for entertainment and well-being. Poetics, 69, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.04.001
80.
YadenD. B.HaidtJ.HoodR. W.VagoD. R.NewbergA. B. (2017). The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000102
81.
ZickfeldJ. H.LangeJ. (2021, April16). From Awe to Z: A systematic review of distinct positive emotions [Conference session]. SAS Virtual Conference 2021. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4KVAH
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
