Spillover Effects of COVID-19 News Coverage on Willingness to Participate in Medical Research in a Diverse Sample of US Older Adults

Abstract

COVID-19 has dominated news coverage since the beginning of the pandemic. The extent to which exposure to such news affected perceptions of medical research and other health issues is not clear, especially among older adults who are more susceptible to infection and experience more COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality. This study uses a two-wave national panel of U.S. adults ages 50 years and older (n = 1,240) to examine the mechanism through which exposure to source-specific news outlets (e.g., national network broadcasts, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC) affected willingness to participate in medical research for COVID-19 and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), both of which afflicts millions of older adults. We hypothesized that spillover from COVID-19 information exposure influenced potential research participation in AD research through attitudes toward science and COVID-19 misperceptions. Path analysis results provide empirical support for spillover effects which vary by news outlet.

Keywords

medical research misperceptions science attitudes spillover spreading activation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alzheimer's Association. (2022). 2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 18(4), 700–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12638

Anderson

J. R.

(1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3

Ash

Galletta

Hangartner

Margalit

Pinna

(2020). The effect of Fox News on health behavior during COVID-19. Available at SSRN 3636762.

Banerjee

Alsan

Breza

Chandrasekhar

A. G.

Chowdhury

Duflo

Goldsmith-Pinkham

Olken

B. A.

(2020). Messages on covid-19 prevention in India increased symptoms reporting and adherence to preventive behaviors among 25 million recipients with similar effects on non-recipient members of their communities (no. W27496) (No. w27496). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Barrett

N. J.

Rodriguez

E. M.

Iachan

Hyslop

Ingraham

K. L.

G. M.

Martin

Haring

R. C.

Rivadeneira

N. A.

Erwin

D. O.

Fish

L. J.

Middleton

Hiatt

R. A.

Patierno

S. R.

Sarkar

Gage-Bouchard

E. A.

(2020). Factors associated with biomedical research participation within community-based samples across 3 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Cancer, 126(5), 1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32487

Besley

J. C.

Shanahan

(2005). Media attention and exposure in relation to support for agricultural biotechnology. Science Communication, 26(4), 347–367.

Bingaman

Brewer

P. R.

Paintsil

Wilson

D. C.

(2021). Siri, show me scary images of ai”: Effects of text-based frames and visuals on support for artificial intelligence. Science Communication, 43(3), 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547021998069

Bleakley

Maloney

E. K.

Harkins

Nelson

M. N.

Akpek

Langbaum

J. B.

(2022). An elicitation study to understand black, Hispanic, and male older adults' willingness to participate in Alzheimer's disease-focused research registries. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease: JAD, 88, 1499–1509.

Brennen

J. S.

Simon

Howard

P. N.

Nielsen

R. K.

(2020). Types, sources, and claims of covid-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute, 7, 1–13.

10.

Brewer

P. R.

Ley

B. L.

(2021). Science in the media: Popular images and public perceptions. Routledge.

11.

Britton

McKee

Black

McPherson

Sanderson

Bain

(1999). Threats to applicability of randomised trials: Exclusions and selective participation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/135581969900400210

12.

Budak

Bryan

Ashley

Yujin

Caroline

C. M.

Natalie

J. S.

(2021). COVID-19 coverage by cable and broadcast networks Version V1) Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/doi:10.7910/DVN/LWMYAD

13.

Calderón

J. L.

Baker

R. S.

Fabrega

Conde

J. G.

Hays

R. D.

Fleming

Norris

(2006). An ethno-medical perspective on research participation: A qualitative pilot study. Medscape General Medicine, 8(2), 23.

14.

Carey

J. M.

Chi

Flynn

D. J.

Nyhan

Zeitzoff

(2020). The effects of corrective information about disease epidemics and outbreaks: Evidence from Zika and yellow fever in Brazil. Science Advances, 6(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7449

15.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Covid-19 hospitalization and death by race/ethnicity. Retrieved February 17 from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by-race-ethnicity.html

16.

Chaffee

S. H.

Schleuder

(1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 76–107.

17.

Choi

Fox

A. M.

(2022). Does media slant polarize compliance with science-based public health recommendations? Effects of media consumption patterns on COVID-19 attitudes and behaviors in the United States. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(6), 1331–1341.

18.

Cialdini

R. B.

Reno

R. R.

Kallgren

C. A.

(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

19.

Collins

A. M.

Loftus

E. F.

(1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407

20.

Conner

McEachan

Lawton

Gardner

(2017). Applying the reasoned action approach to understanding health protection and health risk behaviors. Social Science & Medicine (1967), 195, 140–148.

21.

Cross

(2021). Will public trust in science survive the pandemic? Chemical and Engineering News, 99(3), 19–29.

22.

Davis

M. M.

Clark

S. J.

Butchart

A. T.

Singer

D. C.

Shanley

T. P.

Gipson

D. S.

(2013). Public participation in, and awareness about, medical research opportunities in the era of clinical and translational research. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12019

23.

Demirovic

Prineas

Loewenstein

Bean

Duara

Sevush

Szapocznik

(2003). Prevalence of dementia in three ethnic groups: The South Florida program on aging and health. Annals of Epidemiology, 13(6), 472–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00437-4

24.

de Oliveira Santos

G. E.

Giraldi

J. D. M. E

. (2017). Reciprocal effect of tourist destinations on the strength of national tourism brands. Tourism Management, 61, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.011

25.

Dilworth-Anderson

Hendrie

H. C.

Manly

J. J.

Khachaturian

A. S.

Fazio

(2008). Diagnosis and assessment of Alzheimer's disease in diverse populations. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 4, 305–309.

26.

Einhorn

(2020). African Americans may be dying from covid-19 at a higher rate. Better data is essential, experts say. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/african-americans-may-be-dying-covid-19-higher-rate-better-n1178011

27.

Enders

Bandalos

(2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5

28.

Evanega

Lynas

Adams

Smolenyak

Insights

C. G.

(2020). Coronavirus misinformation: Quantifying sources and themes in the covid-19 ‘infodemic. JMIR Preprints, 19(10), 2020.

29.

Farias

Newheiser

A.-K.

Kahane

de Toledo

(2013). Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1210–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.008

30.

Fishbein

Ajzen

(2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.

31.

Fleerackers

Riedlinger

Moorhead

Ahmed

Alperin

J. P.

(2022). Communicating scientific uncertainty in an age of COVID-19: An investigation into the use of preprints by digital media outlets. Health Communication, 37, 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1864892

32.

Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Diversity plans to improve enrollment of participants from underrepresented racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials; draft guidance for industry; availability. Retrieved April 22 from https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/diversity-plans-improve-enrollment-participants-underrepresented-racial-and-ethnic-populations

33.

Friedman

(2020). Cuomo, Fauci, Birx: The new influencers. Retrieved May 2020, from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/fashion/fauci-birx-cuomo-style-influencers.html

34.

Funk

Gramlich

(2020). Amid coronavirus threat, Americans generally have a high level of trust in medical doctors. Pew Research website. https://blogs.libraries.rutgers.edu/archivingcovid19/files/original/d33c81d669cb9233bf48fd9e548886f6.pdf

35.

Gabel

Gooblar

Roe

C. M.

Selsor

N. J.

Morris

J. C.

(2018). Political ideology and participation in clinical studies. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders, 32(3), 179–184.

36.

Gabel

Gooblar

Roe

C. M.

Morris

J. C.

(2021). The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–9.

37.

Gallant

A. J.

Nicholls

L. A. B.

Rasmussen

Cogan

Young

Williams

(2021). Changes in attitudes to vaccination as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study of older adults in the UK. Plos One, 16(12), 1–11.

38.

Garcia

M. C.

Rossen

L. M.

Bastian

Faul

Dowling

N. F.

Thomas

C. C.

Schieb

Hong

Yoon

P. W.

Iademarco

M. F.

(2019). Potentially excess deaths from the five leading causes of death in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties—United States, 2010–2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 68(10), 1–11.

39.

Gobat

Butler

C. C.

Mollison

Francis

N. A.

Gal

Harris

Webb

S. A. R.

Byrne

J. –P.

Watkins

Sukumar

Hood

Nichol

(2019). What the public think about participation in medical research during an influenza pandemic: an international cross-sectional survey. Public Health, 177, 80–94.

40.

Greene

C. M.

Murphy

(2021). Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 27, 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000371

41.

Herrmann

L. K.

Welter

Leverenz

Lerner

A. J.

Udelson

Kanetsky

Sajatovic

(2018). A systematic review of dementia-related stigma research: Can we move the stigma dial? American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(3), 316–331.

42.

Hmielowski

J. D.

Feldman

Myers

T. A.

Leiserowitz

Maibach

(2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23(7), 866–883.

43.

Hooper

M. W.

Nápoles

A. M.

Pérez-Stable

E. J.

(2020). Covid-19 and racial/ethnic disparities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 323(24), 2466–2467.

44.

Hopkins

D. J.

Mummolo

(2017). Assessing the breadth of framing effects. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 12, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015139

45.

Jamieson

K. H.

Albarracin

(2020). The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the sars-cov-2 pandemic in the US. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-012

46.

Jin

Cui

Liu

(2020). Factors affecting people’s attitude toward participation in medical research: A systematic review. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 36(7), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1760807

47.

Judd

C. M.

Drake

R. A.

Downing

J. W.

Krosnick

J. A.

(1991). Some dynamic properties of attitude structures: Context-induced response facilitation and polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.193

48.

Kazemian

Fuller

Algara

(2021). The role of race and scientific trust on support for COVID-19 social distancing measures in the United States. Plos One, 16(7), e0254127.

49.

Ketchum

F. B.

Erickson

C. M.

Chin

N. A.

Gleason

C. E.

Lambrou

N. H.

Benton

S. F.

Clark

L. R.

(2022). What influences the willingness of blacks and african americans to enroll in preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker research? A qualitative vignette analysis. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease: JAD, 87(3), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215521

50.

Kim

M. S.

Hunter

J. E.

(1993). Attitude–Behavior Relations: A meta-analysis of attitudinal relevance and topic. The Journal of Communication, 43(1), 101–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01251.x

51.

Kouzy

Abi Jaoude

Kraitem

El Alam

M. B.

Karam

Adib

Zarka

Traboulsi

Akl

E. W.

Baddour

(2020). Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the covid-19 misinformation epidemic on twitter. Cureus, 12(3), e7255. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7255

52.

Langbaum

J. B.

High

Nichols

Kettenhoven

Reiman

E. M.

Tariot

P. N.

(2020). The Alzheimer's prevention registry: A large internet-based participant recruitment registry to accelerate referrals to Alzheimer's-focused studies. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 7, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.31

53.

Langbaum

J. B.

Karlawish

Roberts

J. S.

Wood

E. M.

Bradbury

High

Walsh

T. L.

Gordon

Aggarwal

Davis

Stowell

Trisko

Langlois

C. M.

Reiman

E. M.

Tariot

P. N.

(2019). Genematch: A novel recruitment registry using at-home apoe genotyping to enhance referrals to Alzheimer's prevention studies. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 15(4), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.007

54.

Langbaum

J. B.

Maloney

Hennessy

Harkins

Karlawish

Nosheny

R. L.

Bleakley

(2023). How intention to join an Alzheimer's participant recruitment registry differs by race, ethnicity, sex, and family history: Results from a national survey of us adults. Alzheimer's & Dementia. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13126

55.

Loomba

de Figueiredo

Piatek

S. J.

de Graaf

Larson

H. J.

(2021). Measuring the impact of covid-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 960–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01172-y

56.

Lwin

M. O.

Lee

S. Y.

Panchapakesan

Tandoc

(2023). Mainstream news media's role in public health communication during crises: Assessment of coverage and correction of COVID-19 misinformation. Health Communication, 38, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1937842

57.

MacCallum

R. C.

Browne

M. W.

Sugawara

H. M.

(1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130

58.

Maloney

E. K.

White

A. J.

Bleakley

(2022, May). Examining news media outlets as sources of information about Alzheimer's and dementia research among population groups that are underrepresented on brain health research registries. International Communication Association.

59.

Maloney

E. K.

Bleakley

Young

D. G.

Silk

K. J.

Crowley

J. P.

Lambe

J. L.

(2023). Television news media consumption and misperceptions about COVID-19 among US populations at high risk for severe health outcomes early in the pandemic. Health Communication, 38, 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.2023381

60.

Maloney

E. K.

White

A. J.

Samuel

Boehm

Bleakley

(2023). Covid-19 coverage from six network and cable news sources in the United States: Representation of misinformation, correction, and portrayals of severity. Public Understanding of Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231179588

61.

Manly

J. J.

Glymour

M. M.

(2021). What the aducanumab approval reveals about Alzheimer disease research. JAMA Neurology, 78(11), 1305–1306. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3404

62.

McEachan

R. R. C.

Conner

Taylor

N. J.

Lawton

R. J.

(2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.521684

63.

Mian

Khan

(2020). Coronavirus: The spread of misinformation. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3

64.

Motta

Stecula

Farhart

(2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the US. Canadian Journal of Political Science. Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 53(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423920000396

65.

Muddiman

Budak

Bryan

Kim

Murray

Mary Margaret

Geiger

Purcell

Ludzenski

Turner

Duchovany

Stroud

(2020). Cable and nightly network news coverage of coronavirus. Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/coronavirus-network-coverage

66.

Muthén

(2006). Mplus user's guide version 7. Muthen & Muthen.

67.

Nagler

R. H.

Vogel

R. I.

Gollust

S. E.

Yzer

M. C.

Rothman

A. J.

(2022). Effects of prior exposure to conflicting health information on responses to subsequent unrelated health messages: Results from a population-based longitudinal experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 56(5), 498–511.

68.

Nagler

R. H.

Yzer

M. C.

Rothman

A. J.

(2019). Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: Results from a population-based survey experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(10), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay098

69.

Nisbet

M. C.

Scheufele

D. A.

Shanahan

Moy

Brossard

Lewenstein

B. V.

(2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196

70.

Nyhan

Reifler

(2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2

71.

Post

Bienzeisler

Lohöfener

(2021). A desire for authoritative science? How citizens' informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 30(5), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211005334

72.

Price

Cappella

J. N.

Nir

(2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506

73.

Rauschnabel

P. A.

Herz

Schlegelmilch

B. B.

Ivens

B. S.

(2015). Brands and religious labels: A spillover perspective. Journal of Marketing Management (JMM), 31(11-12), 1285–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2015.1013489

74.

Schultz

Ward, J.K

Atlani-Duault

Holmes

S. M

Mancini

. (2021). French public familiarity and attitudes toward clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2611.

75.

Simonov

Sacher

S. K.

Dubé

J.-P. H.

Biswas

(2020). The persuasive effect of Fox News: Non-compliance with social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. National Bureau of Economic Research.

76.

Snouwaert

(2020). Watch people in cities around the world cheer from their windows and rooftops at the same time to thank healthcare workers and first responders. Retrieved May 2020, from https://www.businessinsider.com/videos-people-cities-cheering-healthcare-workers-windows-rooftops-same-time-2020-4

77.

Thomas

Anoruo

N. A.

(2020). Coronavirus is disproportionately killing the black community. Here's what experts say can be done about it. Retrieved May 2020, from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/coronavirus-disproportionately-killing-black-community-experts/story?id=70011986

78.

Thøgersen

Ölander

(2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(03)00018-5

79.

Truelove

H. B.

Carrico

A. R.

Weber

E. U.

Raimi

K. T.

Vandenbergh

M. P.

(2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 29, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004

80.

Ullman

J. B.

Bentler

P. M.

(2012). Structuralequationmodeling. In Weiner

I. B.

(Ed.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 661–690). Wiley.

81.

Veenstra

A. S.

Hossain

M. D.

Lyons

B. A.

(2014). Partisan media and discussion as enhancers of the belief gap. Mass Communication & Society, 17(6), 874–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.855791

82.

Verity

Okell

Dorigatti

Winskill

Whittaker

Imai

Cuomo-Dannenburg

Thompson

Walker

Dighe

Griffin

Baguelin

Bhatia

Boonyasiri

Cori

Cucunuba

FitzJohn

Gaythorpe

Ferguson

(2020). Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: A model-based analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(6), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30243-7

83.

Viswanath

Bekalu

Dhawan

Pinnamaneni

Lang

McLoud

(2021). Individual and social determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 818.

84.

von Sikorski

Herbst

. (2020). Not practicing what they preached! Exploring negative spillover effects of news about ex-politicians’ hypocrisy on party attitudes, voting intentions, and political trust. Media Psychology, 23(3), 436–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1604237

85.

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

(2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1716500

86.

Webb

T. L.

Sheeran

(2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249

87.

Weiner

M. W.

Nosheny

Camacho

Truran-Sacrey

Mackin

R. S.

Flenniken

Ulbricht

Insel

Finley

Fockler

Veitch

(2018). The brain health registry: An internet-based platform for recruitment, assessment, and longitudinal monitoring of participants for neuroscience studies. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 14(8), 1063–1076.

88.

Weuve

Barnes

L. L.

Mendes de Leon

C. F.

Rajan

K. B.

Beck

Aggarwal

N. T.

Hebert

L. E.

Bennett

D. A.

Wilson

R. S.

Evans

D. A.

(2018). Cognitive aging in black and white Americans: Cognition, cognitive decline, and incidence of Alzheimer disease dementia. Epidemiology, 29(1), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000747

89.

Williams

J. P.

(2020). Black people are disproportionately getting and dying from COVID-19. https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/articles/2020-04-07/black-people-are-disproportionately-dying-from-coronavirus

90.

Yancey

A. K.

Ortega

A. N.

Kumanyika

S. K.

(2006). Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 1–28. https://doi.org/0.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113