Reciprocal Relationships Between Adolescents’ Incidental Exposure to Climate-Related Social Media Content and Online Climate Change Engagement

Abstract

This study examined whether incidental exposure (IE) to climate content on social media can foster online climate change engagement among mid-to-late adolescents, using two-wave panel data (N_{w1 & w2} = 574) gathered among Flemish adolescents (14–19). Structural equation analyses indicated that online climate change engagement positively predicted IE 4 months later, but not vice versa. IE did not significantly relate to online engagement 4 months later, irrespective of level of climate interest. However, we observed an antecedent role for climate interest; Higher climate interest was reflected in more online climate change engagement. Moreover, IE translated into higher levels of online climate change engagement among adolescents reporting high levels of injunctive peer norms. These findings suggest that social media are reinforcing rather than equalizing gaps in online climate change engagement and demonstrate how dispositional and social factors interact in shaping adolescents’ incidental social media exposure and online engagement.

Keywords

social media IE online climate change engagement attention climate interest adolescents longitudinal structural equation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

(2006). Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior questionnaire

Barnidge

(2023). IE and news engagement: Testing temporal order and the role of political interest. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1906290

Barnidge

Xenos

M. A.

(2021). Social media news deserts: Digital inequalities and incidental news exposure on social media platforms. New Media & Society, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211059529

Biswas

(2021). Letting teach: Gen Z as socio-political educators in an overheated world. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/103389/fpos.2021.641609

Borg

Lindsay

Curtis

(2020). When news media and social media meet: How Facebook users reacted to news stories about a supermarket plastic bag ban. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3574–3592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820956681

Bouman

Verschoor

Albers

C. J.

Böhm

Fisher

S. D.

Poortinga

Whitmarsh

Steg

(2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62, 102061.

Broussard

Heath

Barnidge

(2021). IE to political content in sports media: Antecedents and effects on political discussion and participation. The Communication Review, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2020.1853491

Cheung

G. W.

Lau

R. S.

(2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343

Chung

Rimal

R. N.

(2016). Social norms: A review. Review of Communication Research, 4, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008

10.

Corner

Roberts

Chiari

Völler

Mayrhuber

E. S.

Mandl

Monson

(2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353

11.

De Groot

J. I. M.

Steg

. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831

12.

DeVito

M. A.

(2017). From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592

13.

Dunn

H. K.

Pearlman

D. N.

Beatty

Florin

(2018). Psychosocial determinants of teens’ online engagement in drug prevention social media campaigns: Implications for public health organizations. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 39(5), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-018-0522-y

14.

Eveland

W. P.

(2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential electio contexts. Communication Research, 28(5), 571–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005001

15.

Eveland

W. P.

Jr. Shah

D. V.

Kwak

(2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253369

16.

Feezell

J. T.

(2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895

17.

Fletcher

Nielsen

R. K.

(2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724170

18.

Haenschen

(2020). Self-reported versus digitally recorded: Measuring political activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318813586

19.

Heiss

Knoll

Matthes

(2020). Pathways to political (dis-) engagement: Motivations behind social media use and the role of incidental and intentional exposure modes in adolescents’ political engagement. Communications, 45(Suppl. 1), 671–693. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2054

20.

Heiss

Matthes

(2019). Does IE on social media equalize or reinforce participatory gaps? Evidence from a panel study. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2463–2482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819850755

21.

Imran

Alam

Beaumont

(2014). Environmental orientations and environmental behaviour: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders. Tourism Management, 40, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.07.003

22.

Kandel

D. B.

(1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American journal of Sociology, 84(2), 427-436. doi:10.1086/226792

23.

Jürgens

Stark

(2022). Mapping exposure diversity: The divergent effects of algorithmic curation on news consumption. Journal of Communication, 72(3), 322-344. doi:10.1093/joc/jqac009

24.

Knoll

Matthes

Heiss

(2020). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. Convergence, 26(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750366

25.

Kümpel

A. S.

(2020). The Matthew effect in social media news use: Assessing inequalities in news exposure and news engagement on social network sites (SNS). Journalism, 21(8), 1083–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915374

26.

Lang

P. J.

Simons

R. F.

Balaban

M. T.

(1997). Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27.

Lang

(2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x

28.

Lang

(2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S57–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x

29.

Lee

Xenos

(2022). Incidental news exposure via social media and political participation: Evidence of reciprocal effects. New Media & Society, 24(1), 178–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820962121

30.

Liu

Hornik

(2016). Measuring exposure opportunities: Using exogenous measures in assessing effects of media exposure on smoking outcomes. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150442

31.

Matthes

Nanz

Stubenvoll

Heiss

(2020). Processing news on social media. The political incidental news exposure model (PINE). Journalism, 21(8), 1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915371

32.

Mavrodieva

A. V.

Rachman

O. K.

Harahap

V. B.

Shaw

(2019). Role of social media as a soft power tool in raising public awareness and engagement in addressing climate change. Climate, 7(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100122

33.

McCombs

M. E.

(2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Polity Press.

34.

Mitchelstein

Boczkowski

P. J.

Tenenboim-Weinblatt

Hayashi

Villi

Kligler-Vilenchik

(2020). Incidentality on a continuum: A comparative conceptualization of incidental news consumption. Journalism, 21(8), 1136–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915355

35.

Nabi

R. L.

Huskey

Nicholls

S. B.

Keblusek

Reed

(2019). When audiences become advocates: Self-induced behavior change through health message posting in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.030

36.

Nanz

Heiss

Matthes

(2020). Antecedents of intentional and incidental exposure modes on social media and consequences for political participation: A panel study. Acta Politica, 57, 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00182-4

37.

Nanz

Matthes

(2022). Democratic consequences of incidental exposure to political information: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 72(3), 345–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac008

38.

Oeldorf-Hirsch

(2018). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022

39.

Oeldorf-Hirsch

Srinivasan

(2022). An unavoidable convenience: How post-millennials engage with the news that finds them on social and mobile media. Journalism, 23(9), 1939–1954. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921990251.

40.

Pearce

Holmberg

Hellsten

Nerlich

(2014). Climate change on Twitter: Topics, communities and conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 report. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e94785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094785

41.

Pinho

A. D. S.

Molleman

Braams

B. R.

van den Bos

(2021). Majority and popularity effects on norm formation in adolescence. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92482-8

42.

Rodgers

R. F.

Mclean

S. A.

Gordon

C. S.

Slater

Marques

M. D.

Jarman

H. K.

Paxton

S. J.

(2020). Development and validation of the Motivations for Social Media Use Scale (MSMU) among adolescents. Adolescent Research Review, 6, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-020-00139-w

43.

Rousseau

(2021). Adolescents’ selfie-activities and idealized online self-presentation: An application of the sociocultural model. Body Image, 36, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.10.005

44.

Scharkow

(2019). The reliability and temporal stability of self-reported media exposure: A meta-analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(3), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1594742

45.

Steg

Perlaviciute

Van der Werff

Lurvink

(2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512454730

46.

Steinmetz

Davidov

Schmidt

(2011). Three approaches to estimate latent interaction effects: Intention and perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior. Methodological Innovations Online, 6, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0030

47.

Stevenson

K. T.

Peterson

M. N.

Bondell

H. D.

(2019). The influence of personal beliefs, friends, and family in building climate change concern among adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1177712

48.

Thorson

(2020). Attracting the news: Algorithms, platforms, and reframing incidental exposure. Journalism, 21(8), 1067-1082. doi:10.1177/1464884920915

49.

Thorson

Cotter

Medeiros

Pak

(2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934

50.

Thorson

Wells

(2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087

51.

Throuvala

M. A.

Griffiths

M. D.

Rennoldson

Kuss

D. J.

(2019). Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.012

52.

Valeriani

Vaccari

(2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616223

53.

Vraga

E. K.

Bode

Smithson

A. B.

Troller-Renfree

(2019). Accidentally attentive: Comparing visual, close-ended, and open-ended measures of attention on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.017

54.

Wang

Corner

Chapman

Markowitz

(2018). Public engagement with climate imagery in a changing digital landscape. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(2), e509, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.509

55.

Weeks

B. E.

Lane

D. S.

(2020). The ecology of IE to news in digital media environments. Journalism, 21(8), 1119–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915354

56.

Weeks

B. E.

Lane

D. S.

Hahn

L. B.

(2022). Online IE to news can minimize interest-based political knowledge gaps: Evidence from two US elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221991550

57.

Wieland

Kleinen-von Königslöw

(2020). Conceptualizing different forms of news processing following incidental news contact: A triple-path model. Journalism, 21(8), 1049–1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915353

58.

Williams

H. T.

McMurray

J. R.

Kurz

Lambert

F. H.

(2015). Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 32, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.006

59.

Otsuka

(2021). Pro-climate behaviour and the influence of learning sources on it in Chinese adolescents. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1761063